Predicting the Risk of Fracture at Any Site in the Skeleton: Are All Bone Mineral Density Measurement Sites Equally Effective?
- 120 Downloads
The ability to assess a patient’s risk of fracture is fundamental to the clinical role of bone densitometry. Fracture discrimination is quantified by the relative risk (RR), defined as the increased risk of fracture for a 1 standard deviation decrease in bone mineral density (BMD). The larger the value of RR, the more effective measurements are at identifying patients at risk of fracture. Epidemiological studies show that RR values for predicting the risk of any fracture are approximately the same for all BMD measurement sites. In this study, we show theoretically that this interesting observation is predictable and a consequence of two related observations: (1) that fracture prediction by BMD measurement sites distant from the fracture site is quantitatively explained by the correlation of BMD measurements and (2) that all correlation coefficients between distant BMD sites are comparable, with values in the range r = 0.55–0.65. The first of these conditions (referred to as the correlation hypothesis) is important because it sets a lower limit on the RR values at distant BMD sites on the assumption that measurements at these sites contain no independent information about fracture risk over and above that provided by their correlation with the fracture site BMD. If the correlation hypothesis is true, the present study points to the importance of the correlation coefficient between BMD sites as a key index that is indicative of the ability of different types of measurement to predict fracture risk. If, on the contrary, the correlation hypothesis is not valid, there is scope to improve bone densitometry by further studies to better identify those measurements that do provide independent information about fracture risk and how best to integrate this information with existing techniques to improve decision making.
KeywordsBone densitometry Correlation coefficient Fracture risk prediction
- 3.Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Nevitt MC, Bauer DC, Genant HK, Haskell WL, Marcus R, Ott SM, Torner JC, Quandt SA, Reiss TF, Ensrud KE (1996) Randomised trial of the effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Lancet 348:1535–1541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster J-Y, Hodsman AB, Eriksen EF, Ish-Shalom S, Genant HK, Wang O, Mitlak BH (2001) Effect of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34) fragment on spine and non-spine fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 344:1434–1441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Royal College of Physicians (1999) Osteoporosis: clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment. RCP, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 8.National Osteoporosis Society (2002) Position statement on the reporting of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone mineral density scans. Bath, UKGoogle Scholar
- 9.Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. Br Med J 312:1254–1259Google Scholar
- 12.World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Technical Report Series 843. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 18.Miller PD, Siris ES, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG, Wehren LE, Abbott TA, Chen Y-T, Berger ML, Santora AC, Sherwood LM (2002) Prediction of fracture risk in postmenopausal white women with peripheral bone densitometry: evidence from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:2222–2230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Knapp KM, Andrew T, MacGregor AJ, Blake GM, Fogelman I, Spector TD (2003) An investigation of the unique and shared gene effects on speed of sound and bone density using axial transmission quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in twins. J Bone Miner Res 18:1525–1530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Clowes JA, Peel NFA, Eastell R (2002) Fractures of the distal forearm, humerus, hip and vertebrae: association with peripheral and axial densitometry measurements. J Bone Miner Res 17:S186Google Scholar
- 31.Blake GM, Fogelman I (2004) Bone densitometry and fracture risk prediction. Eur J Nucl Med 31:785–786Google Scholar