Calcified Tissue International

, Volume 78, Issue 2, pp 65–71

Daily Physical Education in the School Curriculum in Prepubertal Girls during 1 Year is Followed by an Increase in Bone Mineral Accrual and Bone Width—Data from the Prospective Controlled Malmö Pediatric Osteoporosis Prevention Study

  • Ö. Valdimarsson
  • C. Linden
  • O. Johnell
  • P. Gardsell
  • M. K. Karlsson
Clinical Investigations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate a general school-based 1-year exercise intervention program in a population-based cohort of girls at Tanner stage I. Fifty-three girls aged 7–9 years were included. The school curriculum-based exercise intervention program included 40 minutes/school day. Fifty healthy age-matched girls assigned to the general school curriculum of 60 minutes physical activity/week served as controls. Bone mineral content (BMC, g) and areal bone mineral density (aBMD, g/cm2) were measured with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the total body (TB), lumbar spine (L2–L4 vertebrae), third lumbar vertebra (L3), femoral neck (FN), and leg. Volumetric bone mineral density (g/cm3) and bone width were calculated at L3 and FN. Total lean body mass and total fat mass were estimated from the TB scan. No differences at baseline were found in age, anthropometrics, or bone parameters when the groups were compared. The annual gain in BMC was 4.7 percentage points higher in the lumbar spine and 9.5 percentage points higher in L3 in cases than in controls (both P < 0.001). The annual gain in aBMD was 2.8 percentage points higher in the lumbar spine and 3.1 percentage points higher in L3 in cases than in controls (both P < 0.001). The annual gain in bone width was 2.9 percentage points higher in L3 in cases than in controls (P < 0.001). A general school-based exercise program in girls aged 7–9 years enhances the accrual of BMC and aBMD and increases bone width.

Keywords

Bone mineral density Bone width Girls - Physical activity Prepubertal 

References

  1. 1.
    Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC Jr (1990) The contribution of bone loss to postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1:30–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kelly PJ, Morrison NA, Sambrook PN, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA (1995) Genetic influences on bone turnover, bone density and fracture. Eur J Endocrinol 133:265–271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bailey DA, Faulkner RA, McKay HA (1996) Growth, physical activity, and bone mineral acquisition. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 24:233–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bailey DA, McKay HA, Mirwald RL, Crocker PR, Faulkner RA (1999) A six-year longitudinal study of the relationship of physical activity to bone mineral accrual in growing children: the university of Saskatchewan bone mineral accrual study. J Bone Miner Res 14:1672–1679PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sabatier JP, Guaydier-Souquieres G, Benmalek A, Marcelli C (1999) Evolution of lumbar bone mineral content during adolescence and adulthood: a longitudinal study in 395 healthy females 10–24 years of age and 206 premenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 9:476–482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duppe H, Gardsell P, Nilsson B, Johnell O (1997) A single bone density measurement can predict fractures over 25 years. Calcif Tissue Int 60:171–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC Jr (1989) Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women. Ann Intern Med 111:355–361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnell O, Gullberg B, Kanis JA, et al. (1995) Risk factors for hip fracture in European women: the MEDOS Study. Mediterranean Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 10:1802–1815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, Stone K, Fox KM, Ensrud KE, Cauley J, Black D, Vogt TM (1995) Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. N Engl J Med 332:767–773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kannus P, Haapasalo H, Sievanen H, Oja P, Vuori I (1994) The site-specific effects of long-term unilateral activity on bone mineral density and content. Bone 15:279–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haapasalo H, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Heinonen A, Oja P, Vuori I (1996) Dimensions and estimated mechanical characteristics of the humerus after long-term tennis loading. J Bone Miner Res 11:864–872PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blimkie CJ, Rice S, Webber CE, Martin J, Levy D, Gordon CL (1996) Effects of resistance training on bone mineral content and density in adolescent females. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 74:1025–1033CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bradney M, Pearce G, Naughton G, Sullivan C, Bass S, Beck T, Carlson J, Seeman E (1998) Moderate exercise during growth in prepubertal boys: changes in bone mass, size, volumetric density, and bone strength: a controlled prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 13:1814–1821PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McKay HA, Petit MA, Schutz RW, Prior JC, Barr SI, Khan KM (2000) Augmented trochanteric bone mineral density after modified physical education classes: a randomized school-based exercise intervention study in prepubescent and early pubescent children. J Pediatr 136:156–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morris FL, Naughton GA, Gibbs JL, Carlson JS, Wark JD (1997) Prospective ten-month exercise intervention in premenarcheal girls: positive effects on bone and lean mass. J Bone Miner Res 12:1453–1462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fuchs RK, Bauer JJ, Snow CM (2001) Jumping improves hip and lumbar spine bone mass in prepubescent children: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res 16:148–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bass S, Pearce G, Bradney M, Hendrich E, Delmas PD, Harding A, Seeman E (1998) Exercise before puberty may confer residual benefits in bone density in adulthood: studies in active prepubertal and retired female gymnasts. J Bone Miner Res 13:500–507PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heinonen A, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Oja P, Pasanen M, Vuori I (2000) High-impact exercise and bones of growing girls: a 9-month controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 11:1010–1017PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    MacKelvie KJ, Khan KM, Petit MA, Janssen PA, McKay HA (2003) A school-based exercise intervention elicits substantial bone health benefits: a 2-year randomized controlled trial in girls. Pediatrics 112:e447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mackelvie KJ, McKay HA, Khan KM, Crocker PR (2001) A school-based exercise intervention augments bone mineral accrual in early pubertal girls. J Pediatr 139:501–508PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Courteix D, Lespessailles E, Peres SL, Obert P, Germain P, Benhamou CL (1998) Effect of physical training on bone mineral density in prepubertal girls: a comparative study between impact-loading and non-impact-loading sports. Osteoporos Int 8:152–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heinonen A, Oja P, Kannus P, Sievanen H, Haapasalo H, Manttari A, Vuori I (1995) Bone mineral density in female athletes representing sports with different loading characteristics of the skeleton. Bone 17:197–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cassell C, Benedict M, Specker B (1996) Bone mineral density in elite 7- to 9-yr-old female gymnasts and swimmers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28:1243–1246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heinonen A, Kannus P, Sievanen H, Oja P, Pasanen M, Rinne M, Uusi-Rasi K, Vuori I (1996) Randomised controlled trial of effect of high-impact exercise on selected risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 348:1343–1347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kannus P, Haapasalo H, Sankelo M, Sievanen H, Pasanen M, Heinonen A, Oja P, Vuori I (1995) Effect of starting age of physical activity on bone mass in the dominant arm of tennis and squash players. Ann Intern Med 123:27–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Briss PA, Zaza S, Pappaioanou M, Fielding J, Wright-De Aguero L, Truman BI, Hopkins DP, Mullen PD, Thompson RS, Woolf SH, Carande-Kulis VG, Anderson L, Hinman AR, McQueen DV, Teutsch SM, Harris JR (2000) Developing an evidence-based guide to community preventive services — methods. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Am J Prev Med 18 (suppl 1):35–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Haapasalo H, Kannus P, Sievanen H, Pasanen M, Uusi-Rasi K, Heinonen A, Oja P, Vuori I (1998) Effect of long-term unilateral activity on bone mineral density of female junior tennis players. J Bone Miner Res 13:310–319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ahlborg HG, Johnell O, Turner CH, Rannevik G, Karlsson MK (2003) Bone loss and bone size after menopause. N Engl J Med 349:327–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bass S, Delmas PD, Pearce G, Hendrich E, Tabensky A, Seeman E (1999) The differing tempo of growth in bone size, mass, and density in girls is region-specific. J Clin Invest 104:795–804PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu YX, Wikland KA, Karlberg J (2000) New reference for the age at childhood onset of growth and secular trend in the timing of puberty in Swedish. Acta Paediatr 89:637–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    MacKelvie KJ, Khan KM, McKay HA (2002) Is there a critical period for bone response to weight-bearing exercise in children and adolescents? a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 36:250–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fournier PE, Rizzoli R, Slosman DO, Theintz G, Bonjour JP (1997) Asynchrony between the rates of standing height gain and bone mass accumulation during puberty. Osteoporos Int 7:525–532CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Faulkner RA, McCulloch RG, Fyke SL, De Coteau WE, McKay HA, Bailey DA, Houston CS, Wilkinson AA (1995) Comparison of areal and estimated volumetric bone mineral density values between older men and women. Osteoporos Int 5:271–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bonjour JP, Gea T (1991) Critical years and stages of puberty for spinal and femoral bone mass accumulation during adolscence. J Clin Endocrinol Soc 73:555–563Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kroger H, Kotaniemi A, Vainio P, Alhava E (1992) Bone densitometry of the spine and femur in children by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Bone Miner 17:75–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kroger H, Kotaniemi A, Kroger L, Alhava E (1993) Development of bone mass and bone density of the spine and femoral neck — a prospective study of 65 children and adolescents. Bone Miner 23:171–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Theintz G, Buchs B, Rizzoli R, Slosman D, Clavien H, Sizonenko PC, Bonjour JP (1992) Longitudinal monitoring of bone mass accumulation in healthy adolescents: evidence for a marked reduction after 16 years of age at the levels of lumbar spine and femoral neck in female subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:1060–1065CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Glastre C, Braillon P, David L, Cochat P, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD (1990) Measurement of bone mineral content of the lumbar spine by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal children: correlations with growth parameters. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:1330–1333PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bass LS, Saxon LS, Iuliano-Burns S, Naughton G, Daly R, Nowson C, Briganti E, Austen S (2003) Limitations of long term exercise interventions aimed at improving bone health in normally active boys. J Bone Miner Res 18(Suppl 1):151Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Carter DR, Bouxsein ML, Marcus R (1992) New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res 7:137–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lu PW, Cowell CT, L.Loyd-Jones SA, Briody JN, Howman-Giles R (1996) Volumetric bone mineral density in normal subjects, aged 5–27 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:1586–1590CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ruff CB, Hayes WC (1988) Sex differences in age-related remodeling of the femur and tibia. J Orthop Res 6:886–896CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cowell CT, Lu PW, Lloyd-Jones SA, Briody JN, Allen JR, Humphries IR, Reed E, Knight J, Howman-Giles R, Gaskin K (1995) Volumetric bone mineral density — a potential role in paediatrics. Acta Paediatr Suppl 411:12–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Duppe H, Gardsell P, Johnell O, Nilsson BE, Ringsberg K (1997) Bone mineral density, muscle strength and physical activity. A population-based study of 332 subjects aged 15–42 years. Acta Orthop Scand 68:97–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sundberg M, Duppe H, Gardsell P, Johnell O, Ornstein E, Sernbo I (1997) Bone mineral density in adolescents. Higher values in a rural area — a population-based study of 246 subjects in southern Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 68:456–460PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sundberg M, Gardsell P, Johnell O, Karlsson MK, Ornstein E, Sandstedt B, Sernbo I (2001) Peripubertal moderate exercise increases bone mass in boys but not in girls: a population-based intervention study. Osteoporos Int 12:230–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Duke PM, Litt IF, Gross RT (1980) Adolescents’ self-assessment of sexual maturation. Pediatrics 66:918–920PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bass L (2003) Limitations of long term exercise interventions aimed at improving bone health in normally active boys. J Bone Miner Res 18(suppl 2):M151Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Magnusson H, Karlsson M (2000) Bone mass, bone size and bone metabolism in male and female athletes. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Swedish Orthopedic Society, Vaxjo, Sweden, Sept. 8, 2000Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Valdimarsson O (2005) Reduced training is associated with increased loss of bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res, http://www.jbmr-online.com
  51. 51.
    Duan Y, Parfitt A, Seeman E (1999) Vertebral bone mass, size, and volumetric density in women with spinal fractures. J Bone Miner Res 14:1796–1802PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Haapasalo H, Kontulainen S, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Jarvinen M, Vuori I (2000) Exercise-induced bone gain is due to enlargement in bone size without a change in volumetric bone density: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study of the upper arms of male tennis players. Bone 27:351–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kontulainen S, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Pasanen M, Vuori I (2003) Effect of long-term impact-loading on mass, size, and estimated strength of humerus and radius of female racquet-sports players: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study between young and old starters and controls. J Bone Miner Res 18:352–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zebaze RMWF, Juliano-Burns S, Evans A, Seeman E (2004) The femoral neck is ellipsoid: the assumption of circularity or parallelepipedal shape introduces errors in volume and volumetric bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 19(suppl 1):366Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ö. Valdimarsson
    • 1
  • C. Linden
    • 1
  • O. Johnell
    • 1
  • P. Gardsell
    • 1
  • M. K. Karlsson
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical SciencesLund University, Malmö University HospitalSweden

Personalised recommendations