Calcified Tissue International

, Volume 73, Issue 2, pp 122–132 | Cite as

A Comparison Study of the Reference Curves of Bone Mineral Density at Different Skeletal Sites in Native Chinese, Japanese, and American Caucasian Women

  • X. P. Wu
  • E. Y. Liao
  • G. Huang
  • R. C. Dai
  • H. Zhang
Clinical Investigations


To understand the differences among reference curves for bone mineral density (BMD) for Chinese, Japanese, and American Caucasian women, we measured the BMD at the anteroposterior (AP) lumbar spine (L1–L4), lateral lumbar spine (L2–L4), hip (including the femoral neck, trochanter, intertrochanter, Ward’s triangle, and total hip), and ultradistal forearm by the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a total of 2728 healthy Chinese women, aged 5–96 years. Documented BMD data for Japanese women and device manufacturer’s BMD new reference databases (including the NHANES III dataset) for American Caucasian women were also used in this study. The cubic regression model was found to fit best in analyzing the age-associated variations of BMD at various sites in Chinese women, i.e., the equations had the largest coefficient of determination (R 2). At the AP/Lat spine, trochanter, intertrochanter, and Ward’s triangle, BMD reference curves for Chinese women were lower than those for Japanese or Caucasian women, while at the femoral neck, total hip, and ultradistal forearm, the reference curves for Chinese women were higher than those for Japanese women, with overlaps and crossing of the curves for some age spans in comparing the Chinese and Caucasian women. There were significant differences in the peak BMD (PBMD) at various sites among the Chinese, Japanese, and Caucasian women (P = 0.000). The PBMDs for Chinese women at the lumbar spine and various sites of the hip were 5.7% ± 2.1% (mean ± SD, range, 2.7–7.9%) lower than those for Japanese women and 5.1% ± 2.7% (range, 0.5–7.2%) lower than those for Caucasian women; however, the PBMDs for Chinese women were 26.2% higher than those for Japanese women and 10% higher than those for Caucasian women at the ultradistal forearm. After the PBMD, average T-scores of Chinese women for losses at the AP lumbar spine with increasing age were nearly identical to those for Japanese women, but both were greater than those for Caucasian women. The average T-scores for BMD loss at various sites in Chinese women were higher than those for both Japanese and Caucasian women except at the femoral neck, where the T-scores of Chinese women were exceeded by those of both Japanese and Caucasian women. Estimated from the T-score curve of BMD loss, the age of osteoporosis occurrence at the femoral neck in Chinese women was about 10 years later than that in Japanese or Caucasian women; at the AP spine, Chinese women were similar to Japanese women; at the other sites, the age for occurrence of osteoporosis in Chinese women was about 5–15 years earlier than that in either Japanese or Caucasian women. There are differences in prevalence or odds ratio (OR) of osteoporosis at the same skeletal region for Chinese, Japanese, and Caucasian women aged ≥50 years or at different skeletal regions in women of the same race. The prevalences of osteoporosis at various regions of the hip in Chinese women are 10.1–19.8% and ORs are 22.0–32.3, of which prevalence at the femoral neck is the lowest (10.1%); the prevalences of osteoporosis in Japanese women are 11.6–16.8% and ORs are 21.1–26.3, of which prevalence at the femoral neck is the lowest (11.6%); and the prevalences of osteoporosis in Caucasian women are 13.0–20.0% and ORs are 19.4–48.9, of which prevalence at the femoral neck is the highest (20%). In conclusion, racial differences in BMD reference curves, prevalences, and risks of osteoporosis at various skeletal sites exist among native Chinese, Japanese, and American Caucasian women.


Bone mineral density Dual-energy absorptiometry Race Women Reference curve Osteoporosis Prevalence 



We express our heartfelt thanks to Engineer Rich Mogan with application support of Hologic Co. and Engineer Shou-Xian Lu with Beijing Service Department of Hologic Co., who provided us with important literature and new BMD reference databases (including the NHANES III dataset).


  1. 1.
    Anden, NK, Baker, J, Hogg, C, Baan, K, Spector, TD 1996The heritability of bone mineral density, ultrasound of the calcaneus and hip axis length: a study of postmenopausal twins.J Bone Miner Res11530534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zmuda, JM, Cauley, JA, Danielson, ME, Wolf, RL, Ferrell, RE 1997Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms, bone turnover, and rates of bone loss in older African-American women.J Bone Miner Res1214461452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henry, YM, Eastell, R 1997Race and gender differences in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover (BT) in young adults.J Bone Miner Res12S249Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vogel, JM, Davis, JW, Nomura, A, Wasnich, RD, Ross, PD 1997The effects of smoking on bone mass and the rates of bone loss among elderly Japanese–American men.J Bone Miner Res1214951501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haapasalo, H, Kannus, P, Sievanen, H, Pasanen, M, Uusi–Rasi, K, Heinonen, A, Oja, P, Vuori, I 1998Effect of long-term unilateral activity on bone mineral density of female junior tennis players.J Bone Miner Res13310319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    El-Desouki, M 1995Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in the normal Saudi population.Saudi Med J163035Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhudhikanok, GS, Wang, MC, Eckert, K, Matkin, C, Marcus, R, Bachrach, LK 1996Differences in bone mineral in young Asian and Caucasian Americans may reflect differences in bone size.J Bone Miner Res1115451556PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghannam, NN, Hammami, MM, Bakheet, SM, Khan, BA 1999Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Saudi females: relation to vitamin D status, pregnancy, and lactation.Calcif Tissue Int652328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bachrach, LK, Hastie, T, Wang, MC, Narasimhan, B, Marcus, R 1999Bone mineral acquisition in healthy Asian, Hispanic, Black, and Caucasian youth: a longitudinal study.J Clin Endocrinol Metab8447024712PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maalouf, G, Salem, S, Sandid, M, Atallah, P, Eid, J, Saliba, N, Nehmé, I, Johnell, O 2000Bone mineral density of the Lebanese reference population.Osteoporos Int11756764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Delezé, M, Cons–Molina, F, Villa, AR, Morales–Torres, J, Gonzalez–Gonzalez, JG, Calva, JJ, Murillo, A, Briceño, A, Orozco, J, Morales–Franco, G, Peña–Rios, H, Guerrero–Yeo, G, Aguirre, E, Elizondo, J 2000Geographic differences in bone mineral density of Mexican women.Osteoporos Int11562569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Melton III, LJ 2001The prevalence of osteoporosis: gender and racial comparison.Calcif Tissue Int69179181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marquez, MA, Melton 3rd, LJ, Muhs, JM, Crowson, CS, Tosomeen, A, O’Conner, MK, O’Fallon, WM, Riggs, BL 2001Bone density in an immigrant population from Southeast Asia.Osteoporos Int12595604CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dougherty, G, Al-Marzouk, N 2001Bone density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in healthy Kuwaiti women.Calcif Tissue Int68225229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iki, M, Kagamimori, S, Kagawa, Y, Matsuzaki, T, Yoneshima, H, Marumo, F 2001Bone mineral density of the spine, hip and distal forearm in representative samples of the Japanese female population: Japanese population-based osteoporosis (JPOS) study.Osteoporos Int12529537for JPOS Study GroupPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kelly, TL 1992Study protocol QDR reference databases.Hologic, Inc.Bedford, MAGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kelly, TL 1990Bone mineral density reference databases for American men and women.J Bone Miner Res5S249Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Looker, AC, Orwoll, ES, Johnston, CC, Lindsay, R, Wahner, HW, Dunn, WL, Calvo, MS, Harris, TB 1997Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. adults from NHANES III.J Bone Miner Res1217611768PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kanis, JA, Melton, LJ 3rd, Christiansen, C, Johnston, CC, Khaltaev, N 1994The diagnosis of osteoporosis.J Bone Miner Res911371141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cundy, T, Cornish, J, Evans, MC, Gamble, G, Stapleton, J, Reid, IR 1995Sources of interracial variation in bone mineral density.J Bone Miner Res10368373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tsai, SC, Kao, CH, Wang, SJ, Changlai, SP, Yen, RF, Chien, PU 1997Normal data for lumbar spine bone mineral content in healthy Chinese men.Calcif Tissue Int61114116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kao, CH, Chen, CC, Wang, SJ 1994Normal data for lumbar spine bone mineral content in healthy elderly Chinese: influence of sex, age, obesity and ethnicity.Nucl Med Commun15916920PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Russell–Aulet, M, Wang, J, Thornton, JC, Colt, EW, Pierson Jr, RN 1993Bone mineral density and mass in a cross-sectional study of white and Asian women.J Bone Miner Res8575582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kin, K, Lee, JH, Kushida, K, Sartoris, DJ, Ohmura, A, Clopton, PL, Inoue, T 1993Bone density and body composition on the Pacific rim: a comparison between Japan-born and U.S.-born Japanese-American women.J Bone Miner Res8861869PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ross, PD, He, Y, Yates, AJ, Coupland, C, Ravn, P, McClung, M, Thompson, D, Wasnich, RD 1996Body size accounts for most differences in bone density between Asian and Caucasian women.Calcif Tissue Int59339343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tremollieres, FA, Pouilles, JM, Ribot, C 1993Vertebral postmenopausal bone loss is reduced in overweight women: a longitudinal study in 155 early postmenopausal women.J Clin Endocrinol Metab77683686PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harris, S, Dallal, GE, Dawson–Hughes, B 1992Influence of body weight on rates of change in bone density of the spine, hip, and radius in postmenopausal women.Calcif Tissue Int501923PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tothill, P, Fenner, JA, Reid, DM 1995Comparisons between three dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring spine and femur.Br J Radiol68621629PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lau, EMC 1996The epidemiology of hip fracture in Asia: an update.Osteoporos Int6S19S23Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Xu, L, Lu, A, Zhao, X, Chen, X, Cummings, SR 1996Very low rates of hip fracture in Beijing, People’s Republic of China. The Beijing Osteoporosis Project.Am J Epidemiol144901907PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Melton III, LJ 1997The prevalence of osteoporosis.J Bone Miner Res1217691771PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Suzuki, T 2001Risk factors for osteoporosis in Asia.J Bone Miner Metab19133141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liao, EY, Wu, XP, Deng, XG, Huang, G, Zhu, XP, Long, ZF, Wang, WB, Tang, WL, Zhang, H 2002Age-related bone mineral density, accumulated bone loss rate and prevalence of osteoporosis at multiple skeletal sites in Chinese women.Osteoporos Int13669676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Faulkner, KG, Stetten, E, Miller, P 1999Discordance in patient classification using T-scores.J Clin Densitom3343350Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ahmed, AIH, Blake, GM, Rymer, JM, Fogelman, I 1997Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis: Do the accepted normal ranges lead to overdiagnosis?Osteoporos Int7432438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • X. P. Wu
    • 1
  • E. Y. Liao
    • 1
  • G. Huang
    • 1
  • R. C. Dai
    • 1
  • H. Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Metabolism and EndocrinologyThe Second Xiang-Ya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410011People’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations