Advertisement

Inventiones mathematicae

, Volume 189, Issue 2, pp 315–357 | Cite as

A notion of geometric complexity and its application to topological rigidity

  • Erik Guentner
  • Romain TesseraEmail author
  • Guoliang Yu
Article

Abstract

We introduce a geometric invariant, called finite decomposition complexity (FDC), to study topological rigidity of manifolds. We prove for instance that if the fundamental group of a compact aspherical manifold M has FDC, and if N is homotopy equivalent to M, then M×ℝ n is homeomorphic to N×ℝ n , for n large enough. This statement is known as the stable Borel conjecture. On the other hand, we show that the class of FDC groups includes all countable subgroups of GL(n,K), for any field K.

Keywords

Manifold Fundamental Group Geometric Complexity Decomposition Complexity Whitehead Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alperin, R., Shalen, P.: Linear groups of finite cohomological dimension. Invent. Math. 66(1), 89–98 (1982) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartels, A.: Squeezing and higher algebraic K-theory. K-Theory 28(1), 19–37 (2003) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartels, A., Lück, W.: The Borel conjecture for hyperbolic and CAT(0)-groups. arXiv:0901.0442v1 (2009)
  4. 4.
    Bell, G., Dranishnikov, A.: A Hurewicz-type theorem for asymptotic dimension and applications to geometric group theory. arXiv:math.GR/0407431 (2004)
  5. 5.
    Bartels, A., Rosenthal, D.: On the K-theory of groups with finite asymptotic dimension. J. Reine Angew. Math. 612, 35–57 (2007) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carlsson, G., Goldfarb, B.: The integral K-theoretic Novikov conjecture for groups with finite asymptotic dimension. Invent. Math. 157(2), 405–418 (2004) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carlsson, G., Pedersen, E.: Controlled algebra and the Novikov conjectures for K- and L-theory. Topology 34(3), 731–758 (1995) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang, S., Ferry, S., Yu, G.: Bounded rigidity of manifolds and asymptotic dimension growth. K-Theory 1(1), 129–144 (2008) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis, M.: Groups generated by reflections and aspherical manifolds not covered by Euclidean space. Ann. Math. (2) 117(2), 293–324 (1983) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dranishnikov, A., Ferry, S., Weinberger, S.: Large Riemannian manifolds which are flexible. Ann. Math. (2) 157(3), 919–938 (2003) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dranishnikov, A., Smith, J.: Asymptotic dimension of discrete groups. Fundam. Math. 189(1), 27–34 (2006) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farrell, F.T., Hsiang, W.C.: On Novikov’s conjecture for nonpositively curved manifolds. Ann. Math. (2) 113(1), 199–209 (1981) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farrell, T., Jones, L.: A topological analogue of Mostow’s rigidity theorem. J. Am. Math. Soc. 2(2), 257–370 (1989) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farrell, T., Jones, L.: Classical Aspherical Manifolds. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 75, Am. Math. Soc., Providence (1990). Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Farrell, T., Jones, L.: Topological rigidity for compact non-positively curved manifolds. In: Differential Geometry: Riemannian Geometry, Los Angeles, CA, 1990. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Part 3, vol. 54, pp. 229–274. Am. Math. Soc., Providence (1993) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farrell, T., Jones, L.: Rigidity for aspherical manifolds with π 1GL m(R). Asian J. Math. 2(2), 215–262 (1998) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ferry, S., Pedersen, E.: Epsilon surgery theory. In: Novikov Conjectures, Index Theorems and Rigidity, vol. 2, Oberwolfach, 1993. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 227, pp. 167–226. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1995) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gromov, M.: Asymptotic invariants of infinite groups. In: Geometric Group Theory, vol. 2, Sussex, 1991. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 182, pp. 1–295. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1993) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guentner, E., Higson, N., Weinberger, S.: The Novikov conjecture for linear groups. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 101, 243–268 (2005) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guentner, E., Tessera, R., Yu, G.: Discrete groups with finite decomposition complexity. Groups Geom. Dyn., in press Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Higson, N., Roe, J.: On the coarse Baum-Connes conjecture. In: Novikov Conjectures, Index Theorems and Rigidity, vol. 2, Oberwolfach, 1993. London Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser., vol. 227, pp. 227–254. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1995) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ji, L.: The integral Novikov conjectures for linear groups containing torsion elements. J. Topol. 1(2), 306–316 (2008) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kirby, R., Siebenmann, L.: Foundational Essays on Topological Manifolds, Smoothings, and Triangulations. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 88, Princeton University Press/University of Tokyo Press, Princeton/Tokyo (1977). With notes by John Milnor and Michael Atiyah zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lang, S.: Algebra. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1965) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matsnev, D.: The Baum-Connes conjecture and proper group actions on affine buildings. math.GT/0703923
  26. 26.
    Ranicki, A., Yamasaki, M.: Controlled K-theory. Topol. Appl. 61(1), 1–59 (1995) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ranicki, A., Yamasaki, M.: Controlled L-theory. In: Exotic Homology Manifolds, Oberwolfach, 2003. Geom. Topol. Monogr., vol. 9, pp. 105–153 (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yu, G.: The Novikov conjecture for groups with finite asymptotic dimension. Ann. Math. (2) 147(2), 325–355 (1998) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of Hawai‘i at MānoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  3. 3.UMPAENS de LyonLyon Cedex 07France

Personalised recommendations