Inventiones mathematicae

, Volume 175, Issue 2, pp 435–451 | Cite as

On the relation of Voevodsky’s algebraic cobordism to Quillen’s K-theory

  • Ivan Panin
  • Konstantin Pimenov
  • Oliver RöndigsEmail author


Quillen’s algebraic K-theory is reconstructed via Voevodsky’s algebraic cobordism. More precisely, for a ground field k the algebraic cobordism P1-spectrum MGL of Voevodsky is considered as a commutative P1-ring spectrum. Setting \(\mathrm{MGL}^i = \bigoplus_{p-2q =i}\mathrm{MGL}^{p,q}\) we regard the bigraded theory MGL p,q as just a graded theory. There is a unique ring morphism \(\phi\colon\mathrm{MGL}^0(k)\to\mathbb{Z}\) which sends the class [X]MGL of a smooth projective k-variety X to the Euler characteristic \(\chi(X, \mathcal{O}_X)\) of the structure sheaf \(\mathcal{O}_X\). Our main result states that there is a canonical grade preserving isomorphism of ring cohomology theories
$$\varphi\colon\mathrm{MGL}^{\ast}(X,X-Z) \otimes_{\mathrm{MGL}^{0}(k)} \mathbb{Z} \xrightarrow{\cong} \mathrm{K}_{- *}(X \ on \ Z)= \mathrm{K}^{\prime}_{- *}(Z) $$
on the category \(\mathcal{S}m\mathcal{O}p/S\) in the sense of [6], where K*(X on Z) is Thomason–Trobaugh K-theory and K * is Quillen’s K-theory. In particular, the left hand side is a ring cohomology theory. Moreover both theories are oriented in the sense of [6] and ϕ respects the orientations. The result is an algebraic version of a theorem due to Conner and Floyd. That theorem reconstructs complex K-theory via complex cobordism [1].


Vector Bundle Chern Class Cohomology Theory Homotopy Category Monoid Homomorphism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Conner, P.E., Floyd, E.E.: The Relation of Cobordism to K-Theories. Lect. Notes Math., vol. 28. Springer, Berlin (1966)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levine, M., Morel, F.: Algebraic Cobordism. Springer Monograph Series in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morel, F., Voevodsky, V.: A1-homotopy theory of schemes. Publ. Math., Inst. Hautes Étud. Sci. 90, 45–143 (1999)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Panin, I., Pimenov, K., Röndigs, O.: On Voevodsky’s algebraic K-theory spectrum. In: The Abel Symposium 2007. Proceedings of the fourth Abel Symposium, Oslo, Norway, August 5–10, 2007. Springer, Berlin. Preprint available via arXiv:0709.3905v2 [math.AG]Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Panin, I., Pimenov, K., Röndigs, O.: A universality theorem for Voevodsky’s algebraic cobordism spectrum MGL. To appear in Homology Homotopy Appl. 10(2), (2008), 16 pp. Preprint available via arXiv:0709.4116v1 [math.AG]Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Panin, I.: Oriented cohomology theories on algebraic varieties. (After I. Panin and A. Smirnov) K-Theory, 30(3), 265–314 (2003). Special issue in honor of Hyman Bass on his seventieth birthday. Part IIIGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Panin, I.: Riemann–Roch theorems for oriented cohomology. (After I. Panin and A. Smirnov) In: Greenless, J.P.C. (ed.) Axiomatic, Enriched and Motivic Homotopy Theory, NATO Sci. Ser. II Math. Phys. Chem., vol. 131, pp. 261–333. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panin, I.: Push-forwards in oriented cohomology theories of algebraic varieties: II. (After I. Panin and A. Smirnov) Preprint, 83 pp. (2003). Available via Scholar
  9. 9.
    Panin, I., Yagunov, S.: Rigidity for orientable functors. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 172, 49–77 (2002)zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thomason, R., Trobaugh, T.: Higher algebraic K-theory of schemes and of derived categories. In: The Grothendieck Festschrift, 3, pp. 247–436. Birkhäuser, Boston (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vezzosi, G.: Brown–Peterson spectra in stable A1-homotopy theory. Rend. Semin. Mat. Univ. Padova 106, 47–64 (2001)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Voevodsky, V.: A1-homotopy theory. Doc. Math., Extra Vol. ICM 1998(I), 579–604 (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Panin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Konstantin Pimenov
    • 2
  • Oliver Röndigs
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Universität Bielefeld, SFB 701BielefeldGermany
  2. 2.Steklov Institute of MathematicsSt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.Institut für MathematikUniversität OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations