Spatial summation in lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex
- 209 Downloads
We have compared the spatial summation characteristics of cells in the primary visual cortex with those of cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) that provide the input to the cortex. We explored the influence of varying the diameter of a patch of grating centred over the receptive field and quantitatively determined the optimal summation diameter and the degree of surround suppression for cells at both levels of the visual system using the same stimulus parameters. The mean optimal summation size for LGN cells (0.90°) was much smaller than that of cortical cells (3.58°). Virtually all LGN cells exhibited strong surround suppression with a mean value of 74%±1.61% SEM for the population as a whole. This potent surround suppression in the cells providing the input to the cortex suggests that cortical cells must integrate their much larger summation fields from the low firing rates associated with the suppression plateau of the LGN cell responses. Our data suggest that the strongest input to cortical cells will arise from geniculate cells representing areas of visual space located at the borders of a visual stimulus. We suggest that analysis of response properties by patterns centred over the receptive fields of cells may give a misleading impression of the process of the representation. Analysis of pattern terminations or salient borders over the receptive field may provide much more insight into the processing algorithms involved in stimulus representation.
Key wordsSpatial summation Surround suppression Receptive field Cat
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cudeiro J, Sillito AM (1996) Spatial frequency tuning of orientation-discontinuity-sensitive corticofugal feedback to the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. J Physiol (Lond) 490:481–492Google Scholar
- Gilbert CD (1977) Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 268:391–4211Google Scholar
- Jones HE, Andolina IM, Wei W, Gerstein GL, Sillito AM (2000) High orientation selectivity in the response synchronisation of LGN cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:S51Google Scholar
- Kato H, Bishop PO, Orban GA (1978) Hypercomplex and simple/complex cell classifications in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 14:1071–1095Google Scholar
- Rose D (1977) Responses of single units in cat visual cortex to moving bars of light as a function of bar length. J Physiol (Lond) 271:1–23Google Scholar
- Sillito AM (1977) The spatial extent of excitatory and inhibitory zones in the receptive field of superficial layer hypercomplex cells. J Physiol (Lond) 273:791–803Google Scholar
- Sillito AM, Jones HE (1997) Functional organization influencing neurotransmission in the lateral geniculate nucleus. In: Steriade M, Jones EG, McCormick DA (eds) Thalamus, vol 2: experimental and clinical aspects. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–52Google Scholar
- Ts’o DY, Gilbert CD (1988) The organization of chromatic an spatial interactions in the primate striate cortex. J Neurosc 8:1712–1727Google Scholar
- Usrey WM, Alonso JM, Reid RC (2000) Synaptic interactions be tween thalamic inputs to simple cells in cat visual cortex. Neurosci 20:5461–5467Google Scholar
- Walker GA, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD (1999) Asymmetric suppres sion outside the classical receptive field of the visual cortex. Neurosci 19:10536–10553Google Scholar