Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 135, Issue 2, pp 275–278 | Cite as

Vestibular signals can distort the perceived spatial relationship of retinal stimuli

  • R. H. CaiEmail author
  • K. Jacobson
  • R. Baloh
  • M. Schlag-Rey
  • J. Schlag
Research Note

Abstract

The flash-lag phenomenon is an illusion that affects the perceived relationship of a moving object and a briefly visible one: the moving object appears to be ahead of the flashed one. In practically all studies of this phenomenon, the image of the object moves on the retina as the object moves in space. Therefore, explanations of the illusion were sought in terms of purely visual mechanisms. Here we set up a situation in which the object’s motion in space is entirely produced by passive rotation of the subject. No motion occurred on the retina. The visual display (a continuously lit stimulus and a flashed one) was mounted on a vestibular chair. While the subjects fixated this display, they were rotated in the dark at a constant speed and suddenly stopped. Perceptual misalignment (flash-lag) was robust and consistent during both the initial phase of rotation and the postrotary period when neither chair, subject, nor stimulus was actually moving. As a vestibular signal can cause an illusory spatial dissociation in the visual domain, we conclude that the mechanism of the flash-lag must be more general than was thought up-to-now.

Key words

Flash-lag Illusion Misalignment Vestibular Rotation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldo MVC, Klein SA (1995) Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature 378:565–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belton T, McCrea RA (1999) Contribution of the cerebellar flocculus to gaze control during active head movements. J Neurophysiol 81:3105–3109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai RH, Pouget A, Schlag-Rey M, Schlag J (1997) Perceived geometrical relationships affected by eye-movement signals. Nature 386:601–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eagleman DM, Sejnowski TJ (2000) Motion integration and post-diction in visual awareness. Science 287:2036–2038PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fukushima K, Sato T, Fukushima J, Shimmei Y, Kaneko CRS (2000) Activity of smooth pursuit-related neurons in the monkey periarcuate cortex during pursuit and passive whole-body rotation. J Neurophysiol 83:563–587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Honrubia V, Khalili R, Baloh RW (1992) Optokinetic and vestibular interactions with smooth pursuit. Ann NY Acad Sci 656:739–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kase M, Noda H, Suzuki D, Miller D (1979) Target velocity signals of visual tracking in ventral Purkinje cells of the monkey. Science 205:717–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Krekelberg B, Lappe M (1999) Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position. Vision Res 39:2669–2679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. MacKay DM (1958) Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature 181:507–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nijhawan R (1994) Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370:256–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Puruschothaman G, Patel SS, Bedell HE, Ogmen H (1998) Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature 396:424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ross J, Morrone MC, Burr B (1997) Compression of visual space before saccades. Nature 386:598–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schlag J, Cai RH, Dorfman A, Mohempour A, Schlag-Rey M (2000) Extrapolating movement without retinal motion. Nature 403:38–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sheth BR, Nijhawan R, Shimojo S (2000) Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones. Nat Neurosci 3:489–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Snowden RJ (1998) Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion. Curr Biol 8:1343–1345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thier P, Erickson RG (1992) Responses of visual-tracking neurons from cortical area MST-1 to visual, eye and head motion. Eur J Neurosci 4:539–553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Whitney D, Murakami I, Cavanagh P (2000) Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Res 40:137–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. H. Cai
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. Jacobson
    • 2
  • R. Baloh
    • 2
  • M. Schlag-Rey
    • 1
  • J. Schlag
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurobiologyUCLA School of Medicine (CHS)Los AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Neurology, Reed Neurological Research CenterUCLALos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations