Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 238, Issue 1, pp 221–228 | Cite as

Activity in the prefrontal cortex during motor imagery of precision gait: an fNIRS study

  • Kohei KotegawaEmail author
  • Akira Yasumura
  • Wataru Teramoto
Research Article
  • 77 Downloads

Abstract

Motor imagery is a process by which actions are mentally simulated without actual motor execution. While previous studies have indicated the involvement of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in gait motor imagery as well as in gait control, the evidence supporting this finding is inconsistent. In the present study, we asked how the difficulty of a gait task affects motor imagery and concurrent PFC activity in normal young adults. Fifteen healthy, right-handed participants (mean age 21.7 ± 4.4 years; handedness uniform by chance) participated in two experiments as follows: (1) participants alternately imagined and executed walking along a 5-m walkway of three different widths (15, 25, and 50 cm); the imagined and actual durations of walking were measured and compared; (2) participants imagined walking along the aforementioned paths of varying width while PFC activity was measured using multichannel, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). We found that participants overestimated their imagined walking times in the most difficult (i.e., narrowest), 15-cm condition. Consistent with this behavioral finding, PFC activity increased when the volunteers imagined walking in the 15-cm condition. Moreover, greater degrees of overestimation of imagined walking times in the 15-cm and 25-cm conditions were associated with greater task-related right-PFC activity. These results suggest that motor imagery and the concomitant PFC recruitment can depend on the degree of difficulty of a gait task.

Keywords

Motor imagery Overestimation Prefrontal cortex Gait Young adults 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing. This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grants 16H06325, 19H00631 to WT.

Authors’ contributions

All co-authors contributed to data collection and interpretation and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Allali G, Meulen M, Beauchet O, Rieger SW, Vuilleumier P, Assal F (2014) The neural basis of age-related change in motor imagery of gait: an fMRI study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 69:1389–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asselen M, Kessels RPC, Neggers SFW, Kappelle LJ, Frijns CJM, Postma A (2006) Brain areas involved in spatial working memory. Neuropsychologia 44:1185–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker M, Lange FP, Stevens JA, Toni I, Bloem BR (2007) Motor imagery of gait: a quantitative approach. Exp Brain Res 179:497–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakker M, Lange FP, Helmich RC, Scheeringa R, Toni I (2008) Cerebral correlates of motor imagery of normal and precision gait. Neuroimage 41:998–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen JD, Perlstein WM, Braver TS, Nystrom LE, Noll DC, Jonides J et al (1997) Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task. Nature 386:604–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Lange FP, Helmich RC, Toni I (2006) Posture influences motor imagery: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 33:609–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Decety J, Jeannerod M (1996) Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts’s law hold in motor imagery? Behav Brain Res 72:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Decety J, Jeannerod M, Prablanc C (1989) The timing of mentally represented actions. Behav Brain Res 34:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dickstein R, Dunsky A, Marcovitz E (2004) Motor imagery for gait rehabilitation in post-stroke hemiparesis. Phys Ther 84:1167–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunsky A, Dickstein R, Marcovitz E, Levy S, Deutsch J (2008) Home-based motor imagery training for gait rehabilitation of people with chronic poststroke hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89:1580–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fairclough SH, Burns C, Kreplin U (2018) FNIRS activity in the prefrontal cortex and motivational intensity: impact of working memory load, financial reward, and correlation-based signal improvement. Neurophotonics 5:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerardin E, Sirigu A, Lehericy S, Poline JB, Gaymard B, Marsault C et al (2000) Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cereb Cortex 10:1093–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guillot A, Collet C (2005) Duration of mentally simulated movement: a review. J Mot Behav 37:10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanakawa T (2016) Organizing motor imageries. Neurosci Res 104:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hardwick RM, Caspers S, Eickhoff SB, Swinnen SP (2018) Neural correlates of action: comparing meta-analyses of imagery, observation, and execution. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 94:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoshi Y, Kobayashi N, Tamura M (2001) Interpretation of near-infrared spectroscopy signals: a study with a newly developed perfused rat brain model. J Appl Physiol 90:1657–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeannerod M (1994) The representing brain, neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. J Behav Brain Sci 17:187–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kanoh S, Murayama Y, Miyamoto K, Yoshinobu T, Kawashima R (2009) A NIRS-based brain-computer interface system during motor imagery: system development and online feedback training. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 13:594–597Google Scholar
  19. Klaassen EB, Evers EAT, de Groot RHM, Backes WH, Veltman DJ, Jolles J (2014) Working memory in middle-aged males: age-related brain activation changes and cognitive fatigue effects. Biol Psychol 96:134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. la Fougere C, Zwergal A, Rominger A, Forster S, Fesl G, Dieterich M et al (2010) Real versus imagined locomotion: a [18F]-FDG PET-fMRI comparison. Neuroimage 50:1589–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leung HC, Gore JC, Goldman-Rakic PS (2002) Sustained mnemonic response in the human middle frontal gyrus during on-line storage of spatial memoranda. J Cogn Neurosci 14:659–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malouin F, Richards CL, Durand A (2010) Normal aging and motor imagery vividness: implications for mental practice training in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:1122–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mars RB, Grol MJ (2007) Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, working memory, and prospective coding for action. J Neurosci 21:1801–1802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matsuda G, Hiraki K (2006) Sustained decrease in oxygenated hemoglobin during video games in the dorsal prefrontal cortex: a NIRS study of children. Neuroimage 29:706–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meester D, Ai-Yahya E, Dawes H, martin-Fagg P, Pinon C (2014) Associations between prefrontal cortex activation and H-reflex modulation during dual task gait. Front Hum Neurosci 8:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Overby LY (1990) A comparison of novice and experienced dancers’ imagery ability. J Mental Imagery 14:173–184Google Scholar
  27. Parsons LM (1994) Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:709–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Personnier P, Kubicki A, Laroche D, Papaxanthis C (2010) Temporal features of imagined locomotion in normal aging. Neurosci Lett 476:146–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ruffino C, Papaxanthis C, Lebon F (2017) The influence of imagery capacity in motor performance improvement. Exp Brain Res 235:3049–3057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ryan TA (1960) Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics. Psychol Bull 57:318–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rypma B, D’Esposito M (1999) The roles of prefrontal brain regions in components of working memory: effects of memory load and individual differences. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:6558–6563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sirigu A, Duhamel JR (2001) Motor and visual imagery as two complementary but neutrally dissociable mental processes. J Cognit Neurosci 13:910–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Skoura X, Papaxanthis C, Vinter A, Pozzo T (2005) Mentally represented motor actions in normal aging I. Age effects on the temporal features of overt and covert execution of actions. Behav Brain Res 165:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stevens JA (2005) Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action. Cognition 95:329–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Strangman G, Culver JP, Thompson JH, Boas DA (2002) A quantitative comparison of simultaneous BOLD fMRI and NIRS recordings during functional brain activation. Neuroimage 17:719–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stuart S, Alcock L, Rochester L, Vitorio R, Pantall A (2019) Monitoring multiple cortical regions during walking in young and older adults: dual-task response and comparison challenges. Int J Psychophysiol 135:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vry MS, Saur D, Rijntjes M, Umarova R, Kellmeyer P, Schnell S et al (2012) Ventral and dorsal fiber systems for imagined and executed movement. Exp Brain Res 219:203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu S, Li J, Gao L, Chen C, He S (2018) Suppressing systemic interference in fNIRS monitoring of the hemodynamic cortical response to motor execution and imagery. Front Hum Neurosci 12:1–10Google Scholar
  39. Yasumura A, Kokubo N, Yamamoto H, Yasumura Y, Nakagawa E, Kaga M et al (2014) Neurobehavioral and hemodynamic evaluation of Stroop and reverse Stroop interference in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Brain Dev 36:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N (2008) The role of executive function and attention in gait. Mov Disord 23:329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health ScienceKumamoto Health Science UniversityKumamotoJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Social and Cultural SciencesKumamoto UniversityKumamotoJapan
  3. 3.Graduate School of Humanities and Social SciencesKumamoto UniversityKumamotoJapan

Personalised recommendations