Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 238, Issue 1, pp 205–220 | Cite as

Changes in ipsilesional hand motor function differ after unilateral injury to frontal versus frontoparietal cortices in Macaca mulatta

  • Warren G. DarlingEmail author
  • Marc A. Pizzimenti
  • Diane L. Rotella
  • Jizhi Ge
  • Kimberly S. Stilwell-Morecraft
  • Robert J. Morecraft
Research Article

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that injury to frontoparietal sensorimotor areas causes greater initial impairments in performance and poorer recovery of ipsilesional dexterous hand/finger movements than lesions limited to frontal motor areas in rhesus monkeys. Reaching and grasping/manipulation of small targets with the ipsilesional hand were assessed for 6–12 months post-injury using two motor tests. Initial post-lesion motor skill and long-term recovery of motor skill were compared in two groups of monkeys: (1) F2 group—five cases with lesions of arm areas of primary motor cortex (M1) and lateral premotor cortex (LPMC) and (2) F2P2 group—five cases with F2 lesions + lesions of arm areas of primary somatosensory cortex and the anterior portion of area 5. Initial post-lesion reach and manipulation skills were similar to or better than pre-lesion skills in most F2 lesion cases in a difficult fine motor task but worse than pre-lesion skill in most F2P2 lesion cases in all tasks. Subsequently, reaching and manipulation skills improved over the post-lesion period to higher than pre-lesion skills in both groups, but improvements were greater in the F2 lesion group, perhaps due to additional task practice and greater ipsilesional limb use for daily activities. Poorer and slower post-lesion improvement of ipsilesional upper limb motor skill in the F2P2 cases may be due to impaired somatosensory processing. The persistent ipsilesional upper limb motor deficits frequently observed in humans after stroke are probably caused by greater subcortical white and gray matter damage than in the localized surgical injuries studied here.

Keywords

Reach Grasp Manipulation Brain injury 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NS 046367 and NS 097450.

References

  1. Baak B, Bock O, Dovern A, Saliger J, Karbe H, Weiss PH (2015) Deficits of reach-to-grasp coordination following stroke: comparison of instructed and natural movements. Neuropsychologia 77:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbas H, Pandya DN (1987) Architecture and frontal cortical connections of the premotor cortex (area 6) in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 256:211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black P, Markowitz RS, Cianci SN (1975) Recovery of motor function after lesions in motor cortex of monkey. Ciba Found Symp 34:65–83Google Scholar
  4. Brinkman C (1984) Supplementary motor area of the monkey’s cerebral cortex: short- and long-term deficits after unilateral ablation and the effects of subsequent callosal section. J Neurosci 4:918–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinkman C, Porter R (1979) Supplementary motor area in the monkey: activity of neurons during performance of a learned motor task. J Neurophysiol 42:681–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bury SD, Jones TA (2002) Unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions in adult rats facilitate motor skill learning with the “unaffected” forelimb and training-induced dendritic structural plasticity in the motor cortex. J Neurosci 22:8597–8606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carmichael ST, Archibeque I, Luke L, Nolan T, Momiy J, Li S (2005) Growth-associated gene expression after stroke: evidence for a growth-promoting region in peri-infarct cortex. Exp Neurol 193:291–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cisek P, Crammond DJ, Kalaska JF (2003) Neural activity in primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex in reaching tasks with the contralateral versus ipsilateral arm. J Neurophysiol 89:922–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colebatch JG, Gandevia SC (1989) The distribution of muscular weakness in upper motor neuron lesions affecting the arm. Brain 112(Pt 3):749–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darling WG, Peterson CR, Herrick JL, McNeal DW, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, Morecraft RJ (2006) Measurement of coordination of object manipulation in non-human primates. J Neurosci Methods 154:38–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.11.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Darling WG, Pizzimenti MA, Rotella DL et al (2009) Volumetric effects of motor cortex injury on recovery of dexterous movements. Exp Neurol 220:90–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.07.034 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Darling WG, Pizzimenti MA, Hynes SM et al (2011) Volumetric effects of motor cortex injury on recovery of ipsilesional dexterous movements. Exp Neurol 231:56–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.05.015 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Darling WG, Helle N, Pizzimenti MA et al (2013) Laterality affects spontaneous recovery of contralateral hand motor function following motor cortex injury in rhesus monkeys. Exp Brain Res 228:9–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3533-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Darling WG, Pizzimenti MA, Rotella DL, Hynes SM, Ge J, Stilwell-Morecraft K, Morecraft RJ (2016) Sensorimotor cortex injury effects on recovery of contralesional dexterous movements in Macaca mulatta. Exp Neurol 281:37–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.04.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Desrosiers J, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Roy PM, Guay M (1996) Performance of the ‘unaffected’ upper extremity of elderly stroke patients. Stroke 27:1564–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donchin O, Gribova A, Steinberg O, Bergman H, Vaadia E (1998) Primary motor cortex is involved in bimanual coordination. Nature 395:274–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao H, Liu Y, Lu S, Xiang B, Wang C (2006) A reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion model using intraluminal balloon technique in monkeys. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 15:202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gonzalez CL, Kolb B (2003) A comparison of different models of stroke on behaviour and brain morphology. Eur J Neurosci 18:1950–1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gonzalez CL, Gharbawie OA, Williams PT, Kleim JA, Kolb B, Whishaw IQ (2004) Evidence for bilateral control of skilled movements: ipsilateral skilled forelimb reaching deficits and functional recovery in rats follow motor cortex and lateral frontal cortex lesions. Eur J Neurosci 20:3442–3452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haaland KY, Schaefer SY, Knight RT, Adair J, Magalhaes A, Sadek J, Sainburg RL (2009) Ipsilesional trajectory control is related to contralesional arm paralysis after left hemisphere damage. Exp Brain Res 196:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hermsdorfer J, Ulrich S, Marquardt C, Goldenberg G, Mai N (1999) Prehension with the ipsilesional hand after unilateral brain damage. Cortex 35:139–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hsu HY, Ke CW, Kuan TS, Yang HC, Tsai CL, Kuo LC (2018) Impacts of sensation, perception, and motor abilities of the ipsilesional upper limb on hand functions in unilateral stroke: quantifications from biomechanical and functional perspectives. PM R 10:146–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.07.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones RD, Donaldson IM, Parkin PJ (1989) Impairment and recovery of ipsilateral sensory-motor function following unilateral cerebral infarction. Brain 112(Pt 1):113–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaeser M, Wyss AF, Bashir S et al (2010) Effects of unilateral motor cortex lesion on ipsilesional hand’s reach and grasp performance in monkeys: relationship with recovery in the contralesional hand. J Neurophysiol 103:1630–1645.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00459.2009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim YH, Jang SH, Chang Y, Byun WM, Son S, Ahn SH (2003) Bilateral primary sensori-motor cortex activation of post-stroke mirror movements: an fMRI study. NeuroReport 14:1329–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koch G, Ruge D, Cheeran B et al (2009) TMS activation of interhemispheric pathways between the posterior parietal cortex and the contralateral motor cortex. J Physiol 587:4281–4292.  https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2009.174086 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Laufer Y, Gattenio L, Parnas E, Sinai D, Sorek Y, Dickstein R (2001) Time-related changes in motor performance of the upper extremity ipsilateral to the side of the lesion in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 15:167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lei Y, Perez MA (2017) Cortical contributions to sensory gating in the ipsilateral somatosensory cortex during voluntary activity. J Physiol 595:6203–6217.  https://doi.org/10.1113/JP274504 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu Y, Latremoliere A, Li X et al (2018) Touch and tactile neuropathic pain sensitivity are set by corticospinal projections. Nature 561:547–550.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0515-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Luke LM, Allred RP, Jones TA (2004) Unilateral ischemic sensorimotor cortical damage induces contralesional synaptogenesis and enhances skilled reaching with the ipsilateral forelimb in adult male rats. Synapse 54:187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marque P, Felez A, Puel M, Demonet JF, Guiraud-Chaumeil B, Roques CF, Chollet F (1997) Impairment and recovery of left motor function in patients with right hemiplegia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 62:77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marshall JW, Ridley RM, Baker HF, Hall LD, Carpenter TA, Wood NI (2003) Serial MRI, functional recovery, and long-term infarct maturation in a non-human primate model of stroke. Brain Res Bull 61:577–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McNeal DW, Darling WG, Ge J et al (2010) Selective long-term reorganization of the corticospinal projection from the supplementary motor cortex following recovery from lateral motor cortex injury. J Comp Neurol 518:586–621.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.22218 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Metrot J, Froger J, Hauret I, Mottet D, van Dokkum L, Laffont I (2013) Motor recovery of the ipsilesional upper limb in subacute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94:2283–2290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Morecraft RJ, Van Hoesen GW (1992) Cingulate input to the primary and supplementary motor cortices in the rhesus monkey: evidence for somatotopy in areas 24c and 23c. J Comp Neurol 322:471–489.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903220403 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Morecraft RJ, Geula C, Mesulam MM (1992) Cytoarchitecture and neural afferents of orbitofrontal cortex in the brain of the monkey. J Comp Neurol 323:341–358.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903230304 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Morecraft RJ, Louie JL, Herrick JL, Stilwell-Morecraft KS (2001) Cortical innervation of the facial nucleus in the non-human primate: a new interpretation of the effects of stroke and related subtotal brain trauma on the muscles of facial expression. Brain 124:176–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morecraft RJ, Herrick JL, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, Louie JL, Schroeder CM, Ottenbacher JG, Schoolfield MW (2002) Localization of arm representation in the corona radiata and internal capsule in the non-human primate. Brain 125:176–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morecraft RJ, McNeal DW, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, Gedney M, Ge J, Schroeder CM, van Hoesen GW (2007) Amygdala interconnections with the cingulate motor cortex in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 500:134–165.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21165 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Morecraft RJ, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, Cipolloni PB, Ge J, McNeal DW, Pandya DN (2012) Cytoarchitecture and cortical connections of the anterior cingulate and adjacent somatomotor fields in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res Bull 87:457–497.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.12.005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Morecraft RJ, Ge J, Stilwell-Morecraft KS et al (2015a) Vulnerability of the medial frontal corticospinal projection accompanies combined lateral frontal and parietal cortex injury in rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 523:669–697.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23703 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Morecraft RJ, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, Ge J, Cipolloni PB, Pandya DN (2015b) Cytoarchitecture and cortical connections of the anterior insula and adjacent frontal motor fields in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res Bull.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2015.10.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Morecraft RJ, Ge J, Stilwell-Morecraft KS et al (2016) Frontal and frontoparietal injury differentially affect the ipsilateral corticospinal projection from the nonlesioned hemisphere in monkey (Macaca mulatta). J Comp Neurol 524:380–407.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23861 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mutha PK, Stapp LH, Sainburg RL, Haaland KY (2014) Frontal and parietal cortex contributions to action modification. Cortex 57:38–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.03.005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Noskin O, Krakauer JW, Lazar RM, Festa JR, Handy C, O’Brien KA, Marshall RS (2008) Ipsilateral motor dysfunction from unilateral stroke: implications for the functional neuroanatomy of hemiparesis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:401–406.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.118463 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Nudo RJ, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM, Prejean T, Grenda R (1992) Neurophysiological correlates of hand preference in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci 12:2918–2947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW (1996) Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272:1791–1794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. O’Bryant A, Bernier B, Jones TA (2007) Abnormalities in skilled reaching movements are improved by peripheral anesthetization of the less-affected forelimb after sensorimotor cortical infarcts in rats. Behav Brain Res 177:298–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pizzimenti MA, Darling WG, Rotella DL et al (2007) Measurement of reaching kinematics and prehensile dexterity in nonhuman primates. J Neurophysiol 98:1015–1029.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00354.2007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Pohl PS, Filion DL, Kim SH (2003) Effects of practice and unpredictable distractors on planning and executing aiming after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 17:93–100.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0888439003017002003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Ralston DD, Ralston HJ 3rd (1985) The terminations of corticospinal tract axons in the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol 242:325–337.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902420303 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Roitberg B, Khan N, Tuccar E et al (2003) Chronic ischemic stroke model in cynomolgus monkeys: behavioral, neuroimaging and anatomical study. Neurol Res 25:68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL (2007) Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control. Brain 130:2146–2158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN (2006) Fiber pathways of the brain. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Seo NJ, Rymer WZ, Kamper DG (2009) Delays in grip initiation and termination in persons with stroke: effects of arm support and active muscle stretch exercise. J Neurophysiol 101:3108–3115.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.91108.2008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Travis AM (1955a) Neurological deficiencies after ablation of the precentral motor area in Macaca mulatta. Brain 78:155–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Travis AM (1955b) Neurological deficiencies following supplementary motor area lesions in Macaca mulatta. Brain 78:174–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wetter S, Poole JL, Haaland KY (2005) Functional implications of ipsilesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:776–781.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.08.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Yarosh CA, Hoffman DS, Strick PL (2004) Deficits in movements of the wrist ipsilateral to a stroke in hemiparetic subjects. J Neurophysiol 92:3276–3285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yelnik A, Bonan I, Debray M, Lo E, Gelbert F, Bussel B (1996) Changes in the execution of a complex manual task after ipsilateral ischemic cerebral hemispheric stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:806–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Health and Human PhysiologyThe University of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Carver College of MedicineThe University of IowaIowa CityUSA
  3. 3.Laboratory of Neurological Sciences, Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Sanford School of MedicineThe University of South DakotaVermillionUSA

Personalised recommendations