Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 237, Issue 12, pp 3363–3373 | Cite as

Predicting the fate of basketball throws: an EEG study on expert action prediction in wheelchair basketball players

  • D. G. ÖzkanEmail author
  • R. Pezzetta
  • Q. Moreau
  • A. M. Abreu
  • S. M. Aglioti
Research Article

Abstract

The ability to anticipate and detect changes in human movement helps people to modify their behaviors in ever changing environments. Studies indicate that expertise modulates observation of domain-specific actions in sports—a process that is crucial for adapting rapidly to a new situation, often before awareness of environmental changes is achieved. Here, we explored the electrophysiological underpinnings of wheelchair basketball players predicting the fate of free throws performed by wheelchair basketball athletes. We performed electroencephalography (EEG) in semi-professional wheelchair players with different degrees of expertise (players) and in ambulant, non-expert people (controls) while they observed movie stimuli of a free throw that could land inside or outside the basket. On each trial, participants were asked to predict the outcome of the throw. For each group, event-related potentials (ERPs) were averaged as a function of condition, using only the trials that were correctly predicted. Results show that compared to controls, expert players exhibit a greater negative amplitude of oCNV over Pz (an observational contingent negative variation-like waveform which is considered a marker of action effect prediction) during the wrist movement preceding the ball release (the last 100 ms of the shot), which carries the most crucial kinematic information regarding the fate of the throw. Our data provide further support to the view that functional modulation of the action observation network is associated with expertise.

Keywords

EEG Expertise Action prediction Action observation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Santa Lucia Wheelchair Basketball Team for taking part in this study and Dr Arran T. Reader for proofreading this manuscript.

Funding

Funded by the PRIN grant (Italian Ministry of University and Research, Progetti di Ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale Edit. 2015, Prot. 20159CZFJK and Edit. 2017, Prot. 2017N7WCLP) awarded to Salvatore Maria Aglioti.

References

  1. Abreu AM, Macaluso E, Azevedo RT, Cesari P, Urgesi C, Aglioti SM (2012) Action anticipation beyond the action observation network: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in expert basketball players. Eur J Neurosci 35(10):1646–1654.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08104.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abreu AM, Candidi M, Aglioti SM (2017) Catching on it early: Bodily and brain anticipatory mechanisms for excellence in sport. In: Wilson MR, Walsh V, Parkin B (eds) Sport and the brain: the science of preparing, enduring and winning, Part B, vol 234. Elsevier, Cambridge, San Diego, Oxford, London, pp 53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aglioti SM, Cesari P, Romani M, Urgesi C (2008) Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nat Neurosci 11(9):1109–1116.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2182 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Amoruso L, Gelormini C, Aboitiz FA, González A, Manes F, Cardona J, Ibanez A (2013) N400 ERPs for actions: building meaning in context. Front Hum Neurosci 7:57.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00057 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Amoruso L, Sedeño L, Huepe D, Tomio A, Kamienkowski J, Hurtado E, Cardona JF, Gonzales MA, Rieznik A, Sigman M, Manes F, Ibáñez A (2014) Time to tango: expertise and contextual anticipation during action observation. NeuroImage 98:366–385.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bachrach A, Jola C, Pallier C (2016) Neuronal bases of structural coherence in contemporary dance observation. NeuroImage 124:464–472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.072 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bender S, Resch F, Weisbrod M, Oelkers-Ax R (2004) Specific task anticipation versus unspecific orienting reaction during early contingent negative variation. Clin Neurophysiol 115(8):1836–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calvo-Merino B, Grèzes J, Glaser DE, Passingham RE, Haggard P (2006) Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Curr Biol 16(19):1905–1910.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.065 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Candidi M, Sacheli LM, Mega I, Aglioti SM (2014) Somatotopic mapping of piano fingering errors in sensorimotor experts: TMS studies in pianists and visually trained musically naïves. Cereb Cortex 24(2):435–443.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs325 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Casile A, Giese MA (2006) Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Curr Biol 16(1):69–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.071 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cavedon V, Zancanaro C, Milanese C (2015) Physique and performance of young wheelchair basketball players in relation with classification. PLoS One 10(11):e0143621.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143621 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Chan JSY, Wong ACN, Liu Y, Yu J, Yan JH (2011) Fencing expertise and physical fitness enhance action inhibition. Psychol Sport Exerc 12(5):509–514.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Lira CAB, Vancini RL, Minozzo FC, Sousa BS, Dubas JP, Andrade MS, Da Silva AC (2010) Relationship between aerobic and anaerobic parameters and functional classification in wheelchair basketball players. Scand J Med Sci Sports 20(4):638–643.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00934.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Denis D, Rowe R, Williams AM, Milne E (2017) The role of cortical sensorimotor oscillations in action anticipation. NeuroImage 146:1102–1114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.022 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Di Nota PM, Chartrand JM, Levkov GR, Montefusco-Siegmund R, DeSouza JF (2017) Experience-dependent modulation of alpha and beta during action observation and motor imagery. BMC Neurosci 18(1):28.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-017-0349-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Di Russo F, Bultrini A, Brunelli S, Delussu AS, Polidori L, Taddei F, Spinelli D (2010) Benefits of sports participation for executive function in disabled athletes. J Neurotrauma 27(12):2309–2319.  https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2010.1501 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Fujii K, Shinya M, Yamashita D, Kouzaki M, Oda S (2014) Anticipation by basketball defenders: an explanation based on the three-dimensional inverted pendulum model. European Journal of Sport Science 14(6):538–546.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2013.876104 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardner T, Aglinskas A, Cross ES (2017) Using guitar learning to probe the action observation network’s response to visuomotor familiarity. NeuroImage 156:174–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.060 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gomez CM, Marco J, Grau C (2003) Preparatory visuo-motor cortical network of the contingent negative variation estimated by current density. Neuroimage 20(1):216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hack J, Memmert D, Rupp A (2009) Attentional mechanisms in sports via brain-electrical event-related potentials. Res Q Exerc Sport 80(4):727–738.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599614 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hardwick RM, Caspers S, Eickhoff SB, Swinnen SP (2018) Neural correlates of action: comparing meta-analyses of imagery, observation, and execution. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 94:31–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Heil L, Kwisthout J, van Pelt S, van Rooij I, Bekkering H (2018) One wouldn’t expect an expert bowler to hit only two pins: hierarchical predictive processing of agent-caused events. Q J Exp Psychol 71(12):2643–2654.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817752102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hughes G, Waszak F (2011) NeuroImage ERP correlates of action effect prediction and visual sensory attenuation in voluntary action. NeuroImage 56(3):1632–1640.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.057 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Inuggi A, Campus C, Vastano R, Saunier G (2018) Observation of point-light-walker locomotion induces motor resonance when explicitly represented; an EEG source analysis study. Front Psychol 9:303.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00303 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Jin H, Xu G, Zhang JX, Gao H, Ye Z, Wang P, Lin H, Mo L, Lin C De (2011) Event-related potential effects of superior action anticipation in professional badminton players. Neurosci Lett 492(3):139–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.01.074 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jung TP, Makeig S, Westerfield M, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski TJ (2000) Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 111:1745–1758.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00386-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Koul A, Cavallo A, Cauda F, Costa T, Diano M, Pontil M, Becchio C (2018) Action observation areas represent intentions from subtle kinematic features. Cereb Cortex 28(7):2647–2654.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy098 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Kourtis D, Sebanz N, Knoblich G (2010) Favouritism in the motor system: social interaction modulates action simulation. Biol Lett 6(6):758–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kourtis D, Sebanz N, Knoblich G (2013) Predictive representation of other people’s actions in joint action planning: an EEG study. Soc Neurosci 8(1):31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maglott JC, Chiasson D, Shull PB (2019) Influence of skill level on predicting the success of one’ s own basketball free throws. PLoS One 14(3):e0214074.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214074 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Makris S, Urgesi C (2013) Neural underpinnings of superior action prediction abilities in soccer players. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 10(3):342–351.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Malone LA, Gervais PL, Steadward RD (2002) Shooting mechanics related to player classification and free throw success in wheelchair basketball. J Rehabil Res Dev 39(6):701–709PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Maynard FM Jr, Bracken MB, Creasey G, Ditunno JF Jr, Donovan WH, Ducker TB, Waters RL (1997) International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 35(5):266.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100432 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. McFall RM, Treat TA (1999) Quantifying the information value of clinical assessments with signal detection theory. Annu Rev Psychol 50(1):215–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Orlandi A, Zani A, Proverbio AM (2017) Dance expertise modulates visual sensitivity to complex biological movements. Neuropsychologia 104:168–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.08.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ossmy O, Mukamel R (2018) Perception as a route for motor skill learning: perspectives from neuroscience. Neuroscience 382:144–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.04.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Oudejans RR, Heubers S, Ruitenbeek JRJ, Janssen TWJ (2012) Training visual control in wheelchair basketball shooting. Res Q Exerc Sport 83(3):464–469.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599881 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ozkan DG, Pezzetta R (2017) Predictive monitoring of actions, EEG recordings in virtual reality a commentary on action effect monitoring. J Neurophysiol 119(4):1254–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Panasiti MS, Pavone EF, Aglioti SM (2016) Electrocortical signatures of detecting errors in the actions of others: an EEG study in pianists, non-pianist musicians and musically naïve people. Neuroscience 318:104–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.01.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pavone EF, Tieri G, Rizza G, Tidoni E, Grisoni L, Aglioti SM (2016) Embodying others in immersive virtual reality: electro-cortical signatures of monitoring the errors in the actions of an avatar seen from a first-person perspective. J Neurosci 36(2):268–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF (1989) Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuro Physiol 72:184–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(89),90180-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pezzetta R, Nicolardi V, Tidoni E, Aglioti SM (2018) Error, rather than its probability, elicits specific electrocortical signatures: a combined EEG-immersive virtual reality study of action observation. J Neurophysiol 120(3):1107–1118.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00130.2018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Proverbio AM, Riva F (2009) RP and N400 ERP components reflect semantic violations in visual processing of human actions. Neurosci Lett 459(3):142–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.05.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Proverbio AM, Crotti N, Manfredi M, Adorni R, Zani A (2012) Who needs a referee? How incorrect basketball actions are automatically detected by basketball players’ brain. Sci Rep 2:883.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00883 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Ridderinkhof KR, Brass M (2015) How kinesthetic motor imagery works: a predictive-processing theory of visualization in sports and motor expertise. J Physiol Paris 109(1–3):53–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2015.02.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rohrbaugh JW, Syndulko K, Lindsley DB (1976) Brain wave components of the contingent negative variation in humans. Science 191(4231):1055–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rowe R, Horswill MS, Kronvall-Parkinson M, Poulter DR, McKenna FP (2009) The effect of disguise on novice and expert tennis players’ anticipation ability. J Appl Sport Psychol 21(2):178–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Savelsbergh GJ, Williams AM, Kamp JVD, Ward P (2002) Visual search, anticipation and expertise in soccer goalkeepers. J Sports Sci 20(3):279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Savoie F, Thénault F, Whittingstall K, Bernier P (2018) Visuomotor prediction errors modulate EEG activity over parietal cortex. Sci Rep 8(1):12513.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30609-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Sebanz N, Shiffrar M (2009) Detecting deception in a bluffing body: the role of expertise. Psychon Bull Rev 16(1):170–175.  https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.170 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Senna I, Bolognini N, Maravita A (2014) Grasping with the foot: goal and motor expertise in action observation. Hum Brain Mapp 35(4):1750–1760.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22289 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Spinelli G, Tieri G, Pavone EF, Aglioti SM (2018) Wronger than wrong: graded mapping of the errors of an avatar in the performance monitoring system of the onlooker. NeuroImage 167:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Tomasino B, Guatto E, Rumiati RI, Fabbro F (2012) The role of volleyball expertise in motor simulation. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 139(1):1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tomeo E, Cesari P, Aglioti SM, Urgesi C (2012) Fooling the kickers but not the goalkeepers: behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of fake action detection in soccer. Cereb Cortex 23(11):2765–2778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Urgesi C, Moro V, Candidi M, Aglioti SM (2006) Mapping implied body actions in the human motor system. J Neurosci 26(30):7942–7949.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1289-06.2006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Urgesi C, Savonitto MM, Fabbro F, Aglioti SM (2012) Long-and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball. Psychol Res 76(4):542–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang CH, Tu KC (2017) Neural correlates of expert behavior during a domain-specific attentional cueing task in badminton players. J Sport Exercise Psychol 39(3):209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang C-HH, Yang CT, Moreau D, Muggleton NG, Tu K-C (2017) Motor expertise modulates neural oscillations and temporal dynamics of cognitive control. Neuroimage 158:260–270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Weast JA, Walton A, Chandler BC, Shockley K, Riley MA (2014) Essential kinematic information, athletic experience, and affordance perception for others. Psychon Bull Rev 21(3):823–829.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0539-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Wu Y, Zeng Y, Zhang L, Wang S, Wang D, Tan X, Zhu X, Zhang J, Zhang J (2013) The role of visual perception in action anticipation in basketball athletes. Neuroscience 237:29–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.01.048 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Yamashiro K, Sato D, Onishi H, Sugawara K (2015) Skill-specific changes in somatosensory nogo potentials in baseball players. PLoS One 10(11):e0142581.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142581 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Zaepffel M, Brochier T (2012) Planning of visually guided reach-to-grasp movements: inference from reaction time and contingent negative variation (CNV). Psychophysiology 49(1):17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologySapienza University of Rome & CLNS@SAPIENZA at the Italian Institute of TechnologyRomeItaly
  2. 2.Fondazione Santa Lucia (IRCCS)RomeItaly
  3. 3.IRCCS San Camillo HospitalVeniceItaly
  4. 4.Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde e do DesportoUniversidade EuropeiaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations