Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 237, Issue 11, pp 2775–2787 | Cite as

Learning and long-term retention of dynamic self-stabilization skills

  • Vivekanand Pandey VimalEmail author
  • Paul DiZio
  • James R. Lackner
Research Article

Abstract

In earlier studies, we had subjects use a joystick to balance themselves when seated in a device programmed to behave like an inverted pendulum. Subjects tested in a vertically oriented roll plane showed rapid learning for dynamically stabilizing themselves about the direction of balance when it corresponded with the direction of gravity. Subjects tested in a horizontally oriented roll plane, unlike the vertical roll plane subjects, did not have gravitational cues to determine their angular positions and showed minimal learning and persistent cyclical drifting. We describe here a training program to enhance learning and performance of dynamic stabilization in the horizontal roll plane based on our previous finding that balance control involves two dissociable components: alignment using gravity-dependent positional cues and alignment using dynamic cues. We hypothesized that teaching subjects to balance in a vertical roll plane to directions of balance that did not correspond with the direction of gravity would enhance the ability to stabilize at the direction of balance in the horizontal roll plane where gravity-dependent cues are absent. All subjects trained in vertical roll later showed greatly improved performance in horizontal plane balance. Control subjects exposed only to horizontal roll plane balancing showed minimal improvements. When retested 4 months later, the training subjects showed further performance improvements during the course of the retest trials whereas the control group showed no further improvement. Our findings indicate that balance control can be enhanced in situations lacking gravitationally dependent position cues as in weightlessness, when initial training occurs with such cues present.

Keywords

Dynamic balance Vehicle control Spatial disorientation Motor skill learning Long-term retention Vestibular system Somatosensation Path integration Spaceflight analog 

Notes

Acknowledgements

VPV was supported by the Translational Research Institute for Space Health through NASA NNX16AO69A.

References

  1. Abe M et al (2011) Reward improves long-term retention of a motor memory through induction of offline memory gains. Curr Biol 21:557–562CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams JA (1987) Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychol Bull 101:41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakshi A, DiZio P, Lackner JR (2019) Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of voluntary body sway. J Neurophysiol 121(6):2042–2060CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark B, Graybiel A (1963) Perception of the postural vertical in normals and subjects with labyrinthine defects. J Exp Psychol 65:490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clauser CE (1963) Moments of inertia and centers of gravity of the living human body. Technical Documentary Report no. AMRL-TDR-63-36Google Scholar
  6. Collins JJ, De Luca CJ (1993) Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories. Exp Brain Res 95:308–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins J, De Luca C (1995) Upright, correlated random walks: a statistical-biomechanics approach to the human postural control system. Chaos Interdiscip J Nonlinear Sci 5:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dayan E, Cohen LG (2011) Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron 72:443–454CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Graybiel A et al (1968) Diagnostic criteria for grading the severity of acute motion sickness. Aerospace Medicine 38:453–455Google Scholar
  10. Guedry F et al (1971) Use of triangular waveforms of angular velocity in the study of vestibular function. Acta Otolaryngol 71:439–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kawato M, Wolpert D (1998) Internal models for motor control. Sens Guid Movem 218:291–307Google Scholar
  12. Lackner JR, Lobovits D (1977) Adaptation to displaced vision: evidence for prolonged after-effects. Q J Exp Psychol 29:65–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lambert JD (1973) Computational methods in ordinary differential equations. Introductory mathematics for scientists and engineers. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  14. Liao M-J, Jagacinski RJ (2000) A dynamical systems approach to manual tracking performance. J Mot Behav 32:361–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Metcalfe T, Gresty M (1992) Self-controlled reorienting movements in response to rotational displacements in normal subjects and patients with labyrinthine disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 656:695–698CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mittelstaedt M-L, Mittelstaedt H (1980) Homing by path integration in a mammal. Naturwissenschaften 67:566–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nourrit-Lucas D et al (2013) Persistent coordination patterns in a complex task after 10 years delay: subtitle: how validate the old saying “once you have learned how to ride a bicycle, you never forget!”. Hum Mov Sci 32:1365–1378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Panic H et al (2015) Direction of balance and perception of the upright are perceptually dissociable. J Neurophysiol 113:3600–3609CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Panic AS et al (2017) Gravitational and somatosensory influences on control and perception of roll balance. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 88:993–999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Park S-W, Sternad D (2015) Robust retention of individual sensorimotor skill after self-guided practice. J Neurophysiol 113:2635–2645CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Park S-W, Dijkstra T, Sternad D (2013) Learning to never forget—time scales and specificity of long-term memory of a motor skill. Front Comput Neurosci 7:111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Peterka RJ, Loughlin PJ (2004) Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol 91:410–423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Riccio GE, Martin EJ, Stoffregen TA (1992) The role of balance dynamics in the active perception of orientation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Romano JC, Howard JH Jr, Howard DV (2010) One-year retention of general and sequence-specific skills in a probabilistic, serial reaction time task. Memory 18:427–441CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenberg MJ et al (2018) Human manual control precision depends on vestibular sensory precision and gravitational magnitude. J Neurophysiol 120:3187–3197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanli EA, Carnahan H (2018) Long-term retention of skills in multi-day training contexts: a review of the literature. Int J Ind Ergon 66:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Todd CJ et al (2019) Incremental vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation training dynamically tailored for each individual. J Neurol Phys Ther 43:S2–S7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tseng YW et al (2007) Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol 98:54–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vimal VP, Lackner JR, DiZio P (2016) Learning dynamic control of body roll orientation. Exp Brain Res 234:483–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Vimal VP, DiZio P, Lackner JR (2017) Learning dynamic balancing in the roll plane with and without gravitational cues. Exp Brain Res 235:3495–3503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Vimal VP, Lackner JR, DiZio P (2018) Learning dynamic control of body yaw orientation. Exp Brain Res 236:1321–1330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, MS 033Brandeis UniversityWalthamUSA
  2. 2.Volen Center for Complex SystemsBrandeis UniversityWalthamUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyBrandeis UniversityWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations