Forced use of paretic leg induced by constraining the non-paretic leg leads to motor learning in individuals post-stroke
- 34 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to determine whether applying repetitive constraint forces to the non-paretic leg during walking would induce motor learning of enhanced use of the paretic leg in individuals post-stroke. Sixteen individuals post chronic (> 6 months) stroke were recruited in this study. Each subject was tested in two conditions, i.e., applying a constraint force to the non-paretic leg during treadmill walking and treadmill walking only. For the constraint condition, subjects walked on a treadmill with no force for 1 min (baseline), with force for 7 min (adaptation), and then without force for 1 min (post-adaptation). For the treadmill only condition, a similar protocol was used but no force was applied. EMGs from muscles of the paretic leg and ankle kinematic data were recorded. Spatial–temporal gait parameters during overground walking pre and post treadmill walking were also collected. Integrated EMGs of ankle plantarflexors and hip extensors during stance phase significantly increased during the early adaptation period, and partially retained (15–21% increase) during the post-adaptation period for the constraint force condition, which were significantly greater than that for the treadmill only (3–5%) condition. The symmetry of step length during overground walking significantly improved (p = 0.04) after treadmill walking with the constraint condition, but had no significant change after treadmill walking only. Repetitively applying constraint force to the non-paretic leg during treadmill walking may lead to a motor learning of enhanced use of the paretic leg in individuals post-stroke, which may transfer to overground walking.
KeywordsEMG Stroke Locomotion Forced use Constraint force
This study was supported by NIH/NICHD, R01HD082216. We thank Dr. Rongnian Tang’s assistance for data collection.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have potential conflicts of interest to be disclosed.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012) Prevalence of stroke–United States, 2006–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 61:379–382Google Scholar
- Moseley AM, Stark A, Cameron ID, Pollock A (2005) Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD002840Google Scholar
- Perry J, Burnfield JM (2010) Gait analysis. Normal and pathological function. SLACK, Pomona, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW 3rd, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE (1993) Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:347–354Google Scholar
- Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Giuliani C, Light KE, Nichols-Larsen D, Investigators E (2006) Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3–9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296:2095–2104CrossRefGoogle Scholar