Advertisement

Unique controlling mechanisms underlying walking with two handheld poles in contrast to those of conventional walking as revealed by split-belt locomotor adaptation

  • Hiroki ObataEmail author
  • Tetsuya Ogawa
  • Kimitaka Nakazawa
Research Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Pole walking (PW), a form of locomotion in which a person holds a pole in each hand, enhances the involvement of alternating upper-limb movement. While this quadruped-like walking increases postural stability for bipedal conventional walking (CW), in terms of the neural controlling mechanisms underlying the two locomotion forms (PW and CW), the similarities and differences remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the neural control of PW and CW from the perspective of locomotor adaptation to a novel environment on a split-belt treadmill. We measured the anterior component of the ground reaction (braking) force during and after split-belt treadmill walking in 12 healthy subjects. The results demonstrated that (1) PW delayed locomotor adaptation when compared with CW; (2) the degrees of transfer of the acquired movement pattern to CW and PW were not different, regardless of whether the novel movement pattern was learned in CW or PW; and (3) the movement pattern learned in CW was washed out by subsequent execution in PW, whereas the movement pattern learned in PW was not completely washed out by subsequent execution in CW. These results suggest that the neural control mechanisms of PW and CW are not independent, and it is possible that PW could be a locomotor behavior built upon a basic locomotor pattern of CW.

Keywords

Walking adaptation Locomotion Motor learning Pole walking 

Notes

References

  1. Bastian AJ (2008) Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 21:628–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanchette A, Bouyer LJ (2009) Timing-specific transfer of adapted muscle activity after walking in an elastic force field. J Neurophysiol 102(1):568–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bombieri F, Schena F, Pellegrini B, Barone P, Tinazzi M, Erro R (2017) Walking on four limbs: a systematic review of Nordic walking in Parkinson disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 38:8–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choi JT, Bastian AJ (2007) Adaptation reveals independent control networks for human walking. Nat Neurosci 10(8):1055–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collette F, Olivier L, Van der Linden M, Laureys S, Delfiore G, Luxen A, Salmon E (2005) Involvement of both prefrontal and inferior parietal cortex in dual-task performance. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 24:237–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dietz V (2002) Do human bipeds use quadrupedal coordination? Trends Neurosci 25(9):462–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elftman HO (1939) The function of the arms in walking. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferris DP, Huang HJ, Kao PC (2006) Moving the arms to activate the legs. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 34(3):113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Figard-Fabre H, Fabre N, Leonardi A, Schena F (2010) Physiological and perceptual responses to Nordic walking in obese middle-aged women in comparison with the normal walk. Eur J Appl Physiol 108(6):1141–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fukusaki C, Leetawesup K, Kato N, Kadokura Y, Nakazawa K, Yano H, Ishii N (2018) Effects of defensive style Nordic walking intervention in patients with lumbar and lower-limb osteoarthritis. J Nov Physiother 8(2):383.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7025.1000383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ivanenko YP, Cappellini G, Dominici N, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F (2005) Coordination of locomotion with voluntary movements in humans. J Neurosci 25(31):7238–7253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jayaram G, Galea JM, Bastian AJ, Celnik P (2011) Human locomotor adaptive learning is proportional to depression of cerebellar excitability. Cereb Cortex 21(8):1901–1909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jayaram G, Tang B, Pallegadda R, Vasudevan EV, Celnik P, Bastian AJ (2012) Modulating locomotor adaptation with cerebellar stimulation. J Neurophysiol 107(11):2950–2957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kang TW, Lee JH, Cynn HS (2016) Six-week Nordic treadmill training compared with treadmill training on balance, gait, and activities of daily living for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 25(4):848–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaupp C, Pearcey GEP, Klarner T, Sun Y, Cullen H, Barss TS, Zehr EP (2018) Rhythmic arm cycling training improves walking and neurophysiological integrity in chronic stroke: the arms can give legs a helping hand in rehabilitation. J Neurophysiol 119(3):1095–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lam T, Anderschitz M, Dietz V (2006) Contribution of feedback and feedforward strategies to locomotor adaptations. J Neurophysiol 95(2):766–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacLellan MJ, Qaderdan K, Koehestanie P, Duysens J, McFadyen BJ (2013) Arm movements during split-belt walking reveal predominant patterns of interlimb coupling. Hum Mov Sci 32(1):79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malone LA, Bastian AJ (2010) Thinking about walking: effects of conscious correction versus distraction on locomotor adaptation. J Neurophysiol 103(4):1954–1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McFadyen BJ, Winter DA (1991) Anticipatory locomotor adjustments during obstructed human walking. Neurosci Res Commun 9:37–44Google Scholar
  20. Medina JF (2011) The multiple roles of Purkinje cells in sensori-motor calibration: to predict, teach and command. Curr Opin Neurobiol 21(4):616–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meyns P, Bruijn SM, Duysens J (2013) The how and why of arm swing during human walking. Gait Posture 38(4):555–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Monteiro EP, Franzoni LT, Cubillos DM, de Oliveira Fagundes A, Carvalho AR, Oliveira HB, Pantoja PD, Schuch FB, Rieder CR, Martinez FG, Peyré-Tartaruga LA (2017) Effects of Nordic walking training on functional parameters in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports 27(3):351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morton SM, Bastian AJ (2006) Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during split-belt treadmill walking. J Neurosci 26(36):9107–9116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Obata H, Ogawa T, Hoshino M, Fukusaki C, Masugi Y, Kobayashi H, Yano H, Nakazawa K (2017) Effects of aquatic pole walking on the reduction of spastic hypertonia in a patient with hemiplegia: a case study. Int J Phys Med Rehabil 5:401.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9096.1000401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ogawa T, Kawashima N, Ogata T, Nakazawa K (2012) Limited transfer of newly acquired movement patterns across walking and running in humans. PLoS One 7(9):e46349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ogawa T, Kawashima N, Ogata T, Nakazawa K (2014) Predictive control of ankle stiffness at heel contact is a key element of locomotor adaptation during split-belt treadmill walking in humans. J Neurophysiol 111(4):722–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ogawa T, Kawashima N, Obata H, Kanosue K, Nakazawa K (2015) Mode-dependent control of human walking and running as revealed by split-belt locomotor adaptation. J Exp Biol 218(Pt 20):3192–3198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ogawa T, Obata H, Yokoyama H, Kawashima N, Nakazawa K (2018) Velocity-dependent transfer of adaptation in human running as revealed by split-belt treadmill adaptation. Exp Brain Res 236(4):1019–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parkatti T, Perttunen J, Wacker P (2012) Improvements in functional capacity from Nordic walking: a randomized-controlled trial among elderly people. J Aging Phys Act 20(1):93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reisman DS, Block HJ, Bastian AJ (2005) Interlimb coordination during locomotion: what can be adapted and stored? J Neurophysiol 94:2403–2415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reisman DS, Bastian AJ, Morton SM (2010) Neurophysiologic and rehabilitation insights from the split-belt and other locomotor adaptation paradigms. Phys Ther 90(2):187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schubert T, Szameitat AJ (2003) Functional neuroanatomy of interference in overlapping dual tasks: an fMRI study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 17:733–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor JA, Thoroughman KA (2007) Divided attention impairs human motor adaptation but not feedback control. J Neurophysiol 98(1):317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vasudevan EV, Bastian AJ (2010) Split-belt treadmill adaptation shows different functional networks for fast and slow human walking. J Neurophysiol 103(1):183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zehr EP, Barss TS, Dragert K, Frigon A, Vasudevan EV, Haridas C, Hundza S, Kaupp C, Klarner T, Klimstra M, Komiyama T, Loadman PM, Mezzarane RA, Nakajima T, Pearcey GE, Sun Y (2016) Neuromechanical interactions between the limbs during human locomotion: an evolutionary perspective with translation to rehabilitation. Exp Brain Res 234(11):3059–3081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zoffoli L, Ditroilo M, Federici A, Lucertini F (2017) Local stability and kinematic variability in walking and pole walking at different speeds. Gait Posture 53:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroki Obata
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tetsuya Ogawa
    • 2
  • Kimitaka Nakazawa
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Institute of Liberal ArtsKyushu Institute of TechnologyKitakyushuJapan
  2. 2.Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations