Emergence of anticipatory actions in a novel task
Humans normally adapt earlier segments of multistep motor actions in such a way that the execution of later segments is facilitated. For example, the kinematics of grasping movements are adapted to the requirements of the intended subsequent object manipulations. Here we studied which factors foster adaptation of earlier action segments to later ones in a novel task for which no prior experience existed. Participants executed a two-step isometric force production task, in which the force produced in the first segment determined the difficulty of the second segment. Adaptation of the first segment to the second one benefited from explicit knowledge of the dependency between both segments but not from extensive prior experience with the second segment. These observations show that adaptation of motor actions to subsequent actions demands the construction of a task representation that allows to plan the first action segment with respect to its successor. How specifically the first segment is tailored to the second one does not depend on prior experience with the second segment but depends on experience from performing the interdependent two-step action sequence.
KeywordsMotor control Action planning Anticipatory action Action sequences Isometric force
We thank Georg Schüssler and Albrecht Sebald for technical support and Lorena Fleischmann for preparing and running the experiment.
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 3982 KB)
- Fitts PM (1962) Factors in complex skill training. In: Glaser R (ed) Training research and education. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp 177–197Google Scholar
- Herbort O, Kirsch W, Kunde W (2018) Grasp planning for object manipulation without simulation of the object manipulation action. J Exp Psychol 45(2):237–254Google Scholar
- Rosenbaum DA, Marchak F, Barnes HJ, Vaughan J, Slotta JD, Jorgensen MJ (1990) Constraints for action selection: overhand versus underhand grips. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Attention and performance, vol XIII. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 321–345Google Scholar