Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 237, Issue 6, pp 1383–1395 | Cite as

The effects of speed of execution on upper-limb kinematics in activities of daily living with respect to age

  • Philipp GuldeEmail author
  • S. Schmidle
  • A. Aumüller
  • J. Hermsdörfer
Research Article

Abstract

In this study, 26 young, 16 older adults ≤ 66a, and 22 older adults ≥ 67a were examined in a set of neuropsychological tests and the kinematics in two different activities of daily living (ADL) were assessed. Half of the participants performed the ADL in a natural speed, the other half as fast as possible. The performance in the Trail Making Task B revealed an increased slope after 67 years of age. When executed in a natural speed, ADL kinematics were comparable. When executed as fast as possible, almost all kinematic parameters showed significant group and speed differences and revealed group × speed interactions. Models of multiple linear regression predicting ADL trial durations showed similar strategies in the young and older adults < 67a. Factors were the general movement speed, the travelled path lengths, and the simultaneous use of both hands. In the older adults ≥ 67a, factors were the general movement speed, the travelled path length, and the activity level (during the task execution). A principal component analysis supported these findings by revealing two underlying components: movement strategy and age-dependent decline in primarily executive functions, where the ADL trial duration had comparable loadings on both components. These results in association with the accelerated decline in executive functions found in the oldest group suggest that deterioration of ADL with age is particularly caused by specific age-dependent changes in cognitive capacities.

Keywords

Kinematics Bimanual Upper limb Age Speed of execution Activity of daily living 

Notes

References

  1. Andrews G, Halford G, Chappell M, Annick M, Shum D (2014) Planning following stroke: a relational complexity approach using the Tower of London. Front Hum Neurosci 8:1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonsang E, Adam S, Perelman S (2012) Does retirement affect cognitive functioning. J Health Econ 31(3):490–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, p 2Google Scholar
  4. Fozard J, Vercruyssen M, Reynolds S, Hancock P, Quilter R (1994) Age differences and changes in reaction time: the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. J Gerontol 49(4):179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gulde P (2018) Hand kinematics during activities of daily living: the impact of age and neurological disease (Doctoral dissertation). https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/?id=1392048
  6. Gulde P, Hermsdörfer J (2017) Both hands at work: the effect of aging on upper-limb kinematics in a multi-step activity of daily living. Exp Brain Res 235(5):1337–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gulde P, Hermsdörfer J (2018a) A comparison of smoothing a filtering approaches using simulated kinematic data of human movements. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gulde P, Hermsdörfer J (2018b) Smoothness metrics in complex movement tasks. Front Neurol 9:615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gulde P, Hughes C, Hermsdörfer J (2017) Effects of stroke on ipsilesional end-effector kinematics in a multi-step activity of daily living. Front Hum Neurosci 11:42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gulde P, Leippold K, Kohl S, Grimmer T, Diehl-Schmid J, Armstrong A, Hermsdörfer J (2018) Step by step: kinematics of the reciprocal trail making task predict slowness of ADL performance in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neurol 9:140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hashimoto R, Meguro K, Lee E, Kasai M, Ishii H, Yamaguchi S (2006) Effect of age and education on the trail making test and determination of normative data for Japanese elderly people: The Tajiri Project. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 60(4):422–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hobert M, Niebler R, Meyer S, Brockmann K, Becker C, Huber H, Gaenslen A, Godau J, Eschweiler G, Berg D, Maetzler W (2011) Poor trail making test performance is directly associated with altered dual task prioritization in the elderly—baseline results from the TREND Study. PLoS One 6:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Juncos-Rabadán O, Pereiro A, Facal D (2008) Cognitive interference and aging: Insights from a spatial stimulus-response consistency task. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 127:237–246Google Scholar
  14. Kaiser H (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalisch T, Wilimzig C, Kleibel N, Tegenthoff M, Dinse H (2006) Age-related attenuation of dominant hand superiority. PLoS One 1:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ketcham C, Seidler R, van Gemmer A, Stelmach G (2002) Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. J Gerontol 23:1644–1664Google Scholar
  17. Lesourd M, Baumard J, Jarry C, Gall DL, Osiurak F (2016) A cognitive-based model of tool use in normal aging. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 24(4):363–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K (1985a) Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Therapy 39(6):386–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G (1985b) Adult norms for the nine hole peg test of finger dexterity. Occup Therapy J Res 5(1):24–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Obhi S (2004) Bimanual coordination: an unbalanced field of research. Motor Control 8:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oldfield R (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1):97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reitzes D, Mutran E, Fernandez M (1996) Does retirement hurt well-being? Factors influencing self-esteem and depression among retires and workers. The Gerontologist 36(5):649–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rohwedder S, Willis R (2010) Mental retirement. J Econ Perspect 24(1):119–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Salthouse T (1979) Adult age and the speed-accuracy trade-off. Ergonomics 22(7):811–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schaefer S (2015) Preserved motor asymmetry in late adulthood: is measuring chronological age enough? Neuroscience 294:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scherder E, Dekker W, Eggermont L (2008) Higher-level hand motor function in aging and (preclinical) dementia: its relationship with (instrumental) activities of daily life—a mini-review. Gerontology 54:333–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sebastjan A, Skrzek A, Ignasiak Z, Slawinska T (2017) Age-related changes in hand dominance and functional asymmetry in older adults. PLoS One 12:5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shiffman L (1992) Effects of aging on adult hand function. Am J Occup Ther 46:785–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shirota C, Jansa J, Diaz J, Balasubramanian S, Mazzoleni S, Borghese N, Melendez-Calderon A (2016) On the assessment of coordination between upper extremities: towards a common language between rehabilitation engineers, clinicians and neuroscientists. J NeuroEng Rehabil 13:80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stelmach G, Amrhein P, Goggin N (1988) Age differences in bimanual coordination. J Gerontol 43(1):18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tombaugh T (2004) Trail making task A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 19:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vasylenko O, Gorecka M, Rodríguez-Aranda C (2017) Manual dexterity in young and healthy older adults. 1. Age- and gender-related differences in unimanual and bimanual performance. Dev Psychobiol 2017:1–21Google Scholar
  33. Woytowicz E, Whitall J, Westlake K (2016) Age-related changes in bilateral upper extremity coordination. Curr Geriatric Rep 5(3):191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philipp Gulde
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Schmidle
    • 1
  • A. Aumüller
    • 1
  • J. Hermsdörfer
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Human Movement Science, Department of Sport and Health SciencesTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations