Advertisement

Shared right-hemispheric representations of sensorimotor goals in dynamic task environments

  • Ada Le
  • Francis Benjamin Wall
  • Gina Lin
  • Raghavan Arunthavarajah
  • Matthias NiemeierEmail author
Research Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

Functional behaviour affords that we form goals to integrate sensory information about the world around us with suitable motor actions, such as when we plan to grab an object with a hand. However, much research has tested grasping in static scenarios where goals are pursued with repetitive movements, whereas dynamic contexts require goals to be pursued even when changes in the environment require a change in the actions to attain them. To study grasp goals in dynamic environments here, we employed a task where the goal remained the same but the execution of the movement changed; we primed participants to grasp objects either with their right or left hand, and occasionally they had to switch to grasping with both. Switch costs should be minimal if grasp goal representations were used continuously, for example, within the left dominant hemisphere. But remapped or re-computed goal representations should delay movements. We found that switching from right-hand grasping to bimanual grasping delayed reaction times but switching from left-hand grasping to bimanual grasping did not. Further, control experiments showed that the lateralized switch costs were not caused by asymmetric inhibition between hemispheres or switches between usual and unusual tasks. Our results show that the left hemisphere does not serve a general role of sensorimotor grasp goal representation. Instead, sensorimotor grasp goals appear to be represented at intermediate levels of abstraction, downstream from cognitive task representations, yet upstream from the control of the grasping effectors.

Keywords

Bimanual Coordination Grasp Goal representation Sensorimotor Switch costs Motor Representations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Timothy Welsh and Mark Schmuckler for their valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We thank Denise Henriques for lending us her Plato goggles. We also thank Moein Bayat-Mokhtari for his help with data collection. Last, we thank NSERC for funding this research.

Author contributions

A.L. and M.N. developed the study concept. All authors contributed to the study design. Data collection was performed by F.B.W., G.L., and R.A. Data analysis and interpretation were performed by A.L., under the supervision of M.N. A.L. drafted the paper, and all authors provided critical revisions. All authors approved the final version of the paper for submission.

References

  1. Aramaki Y, Honda M, Sadato N (2006) Suppression of the non-dominant motor cortex during bimanual symmetric finger movement: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience 141(4):2147–2153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernardin B, Mason A (2011) Bimanual coordination affects motor task switching. Exp Brain Res 215:257–267.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2890-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blake A, Taylor M, Cox A (1993) Grasping visual symmetry. In: Proceedings from the fourth international conference on computer vision, pp 724–733Google Scholar
  4. Braun C (1992) Estimation of interhemispheric dynamics from simple unimanual reaction time to extrafoveal stimuli. Neuropsychol Rev 3:321–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cant JS, Westwood Da, Valyear KF, Goodale, M a (2005) No evidence for visuomotor priming in a visually guided action task. Neuropsychologia 43:216–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craighero L, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G, Umiltà C (1998) Visuomotor priming. Visual Cogn 5:109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Culham JC, Danckert SL, DeSouza JFX, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA (2003) Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp Brain Res 153:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davare M, Andres M, Clerget E, Thonnard JL, Olivier E (2007) Temporal dissociation between hand shaping and grip force scaling in the anterior intraparietal area. J Neurosci 27(15):3974–3980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duque J, Murase N, Celnik P (2007) Intermanual differences in movement-related interhemispheric inhibition. J Cogn Neurosci 19:204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duque J, Davare M, Delaunay L, Jacob B, Saur R, Hummel F, Olivier E (2009) Monitoring coordination during bimanual movements: where is the mastermind? J Cogn Neurosci 22(3):526–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehrsson HH, Fagergren A, Jonsson T, Westling G, Roland S, Forssberg H (2000) Cortical activity in precision- versus power-grip tasks: an fMRI study. J Neurophysiol 83:528–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frey SH, Vinton D, Norlund R, Grafton ST (2005) Cortical topography of human anterior intraparietal cortex active during visually guided grasping. Cogn Brain Res 23:397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galletti C, Kutz DF, Gamberini M, Breveglieri R, Fattori P (2003) Role of the medial parieto-occipital cortex in the control of reaching and grasping movements. Exp Brain Res 153:158–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallivan JP, McLean DA, Flanagan JR, Culham JC (2013) Where one hand meets the other: limb-specific and action-dependent movement plans decoded from preparatory signals in single human frontoparietal brain areas. J Neurosci 33:1991–2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ganel T, Namdar G, Mirsky A (2017) Bimanual grasping does not adhere to Weber's law. Sci Rep 7(1):6467.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06799-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grafton ST, Arbib MA, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G (1996) Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. Exp Brain Res 112(1):103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton AFDC, Grafton ST (2006) Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. J Neurosci 26(4):1133–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris-Love ML, Perez MA, Chen R, Cohen LG (2007) Interhemispheric inhibition in distal and proximal arm representations in the primary motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 97(3):2511–2515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jäncke L, Peters M, Schlaug G, Posse S, Steinmetz H, Müller-Gärtner HW (1998) Differential magnetic resonance signal change in human sensorimotor cortex to finger movements of different rate of the dominant and subdominant hand. Cogn Brain Res 6(4):279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson-Frey SH, Newman-Norlund R, Grafton ST (2005) A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cereb Cortex 15(6):681-695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kilbreath SL, Heard RC (2005) Frequency of hand use in healthy older persons. Aust J Physiother 51(2):119–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Konen CS, Mruczek REB, Montoya JL, Kastner S (2013) Functional organization of human posterior parietal cortex: grasping- and reaching-related activations relative to topographically organized cortex. J Neurophysiol 109:2897–2908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Le A, Niemeier M (2013a) A right hemisphere dominance for bimanual grasps. Exp Brain Res 224:263–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Le A, Niemeier M (2013b) Left visual field preference for a bimanual grasping task with ecologically valid object sizes. Exp Brain Res 230:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Le A, Niemeier M (2014) Visual field preferences of object analysis for grasping with one hand. Front Human Neurosci 8:782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Le A, Vesia M, Yan X, Niemeier M, Crawford JD (2014) The right anterior intraparietal sulcus is critical for bimanual grasping: a TMS study. Cereb Cortex 24:2591–2603.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Le A, Vesia M, Yan X, Crawford JD, Niemeier M (2017) Parietal area BA7 integrates motor programs for reaching, grasping, and bimanual coordination. J Neurophysiol 117(2):624–636.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00299.2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liao WW, Whitall J, Barton JE, Waller SM (2018) Neural motor control differs between bimanual common-goal vs. bimanual dual-goal tasks. Exp Brain Res 236(6):1789–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liuzzi G, Hörniß V, Zimerman M, Gerloff C, Hummel FC (2011) Coordination of uncoupled bimanual movements by strictly timed interhemispheric connectivity. J Neurosci 31(25):9111–9117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maki Y, Wong KFK, Sugiura M, Ozaki T, Sadato N (2008) Asymmetric control mechanisms of bimanual coordination: an application of directed connectivity analysis to kinematic and functional MRI data. Neuroimage 42(4):1295–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meister IG, Foltys H, Gallea C, Hallett M (2010) How the brain handles temporally uncoupled bimanual movements. Cereb Cortex 20(12):2996–3004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Murata A, Gallese V, Luppino G, Kaseda M, Sakata H (2000) Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J Neurophysiol 83:2580–2601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Naito E, Ehrsson HH (2006) Somatic sensation of hand-object interactive movement is associated with activity in the left inferior parietal cortex. J Neurosci 26(14):3783–3790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neely K, Binsted G, Heath M (2005) Manual asymmetries in bimanual reaching: the influence of spatial compatibility and visuospatial attention. Brain Cogn 57:102–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson AJ, Hoque T, Gunraj C, Ni Z, Chen R (2009) Bi-directional interhemispheric inhibition during unimanual sustained contractions. BMC Neurosci 10(1):31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oldfield R (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramsey R, Hamilton AF (2010) Triangles have goals too: Understanding action representation in left aIPS. Neuropsychologia 48:2773–2776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rice N, Tunik E, Grafton S (2006) The anterior intraparietal sulcus mediates grasp execution, independent of requirement to update: new insights from transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci 26:8176–8182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ringo J, Doty R, Demeter S, Simard P (1994) Time is of the essence: a conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. Cereb Cortex 4:331–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sadato N, Yonekura Y, Waki A, Yamada H, Ishii Y (1997) Role of the supplementary motor area and the right premotor cortex in the coordination of bimanual finger movements. J Neurosci 17(24):9667–9674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shmuelof L, Zohary E (2005) Dissociation between ventral and dorsal fMRI activation during object and action recognition. Neuron 47(3):457–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shmuelof L, Zohary E (2006) A mirror representation of others’ actions in the human anterior parietal cortex. J Neurosci 26(38):9736–9742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shmuelof L, Zohary E (2008) Mirror-image representation of action in the anterior parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 11:1267–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Southgate V, Begus K, Lloyd-Fox S, di Gangi V, Hamilton A (2014) Goal representation in the infant brain. NeuroImage 85:294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Swinnen SP (2002) Intermanual coordination: from behavioural principles to neural-network interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(5):348–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Swinnen SP, Wenderoth N (2004) Two hands, one brain: cognitive neuroscience of bimanual skill. Trends Cogn Sci 8(1):18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tunik E, Frey SH, Grafton ST (2005) Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp. Nat Neurosci 8:505–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tunik E, Ortigue S, Adamovich SV, Grafton ST (2008) Differential recruitment of anterior intraparietal sulcus and superior parietal lobule during visually guided grasping revealed by electrical neuroimaging. J Neurosci 28:13615–13620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Turella L, Tucciarelli R, Oosterhof NN, Weisz N, Rumiati R, Lingnau A (2016) Beta band modulations underlie action representations for movement planning. Neuroimage 136:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vingerhoets G (2014) Contribution of the posterior parietal cortex in reaching, grasping, and using objects and tools. Front Psychol 5:151.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Westerhausen R, Kreuder F, Woerner W, Huster RJ, Smit CM, Schweiger E, Wittling W (2006) Interhemispheric transfer time and structural properties of the corpus callosum. Neurosci Lett 409:140–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ada Le
    • 1
  • Francis Benjamin Wall
    • 1
  • Gina Lin
    • 1
  • Raghavan Arunthavarajah
    • 1
  • Matthias Niemeier
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Toronto ScarboroughTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations