Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of 1 mA for 13 min was reported to create a linear inter-dependency between the intensity and duration of the current and the effects of the stimulation. tDCS on the primary motor cortex (M1) has been shown to have an effect on both motor-evoked potential (MEP) and motor learning. However, recent findings have shown that the known linear effect is invalid in a 2 mA stimulation for 20 min, where cathodal stimulation led to excitability, rather than inhibition, as measured by MEP changes. Here we aim to replicate the non-linear effect of cathodal stimulation over the M1, using a cognitive task. Twenty-two healthy subjects participated in three sessions, where they were administered with a 2 mA anodal and cathodal stimulation for 20 min over the left M1, and a sham stimulation, while performing the serial reaction time task (SRTT). The overall analysis failed to show any effects of either polarity of tDCS on SRTT performance and hence did not replicate previous findings. However, given our goal to replicate the previously reported reversed polarity effects on MEP, we conducted an exploratory analysis to see whether there were any more subtle signs of a change in sign of the cathodal effect compared with anodal. Anodal stimulation led to faster performance than cathodal stimulation before 13 min of stimulation have passed, however, after 13 min, the pattern had switched, and performance under cathodal stimulation was faster. We conclude that cathodal tDCS has a non-linear effect, and the known polarity-dependent effects of tDCS shift after 13 min of stimulation, leading to an increased, rather than decreased, excitability.
Primary motor cortex Serial reaction time task Non-linear effect
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This study was supported by the Israel Science Foundation, Grant no. 367/14.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
Ambrus GG, Chaieb L, Stilling R, Rothkegel H, Antal A, Paulus W (2016) Monitoring transcranial direct current stimulation induced changes in cortical excitability during the serial reaction time task. Neurosci Lett 616:98–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foerster Á, Rocha S, Wiesiolek C, Chagas AP, Machado G, Silva E et al (2013) Site-specific effects of mental practice combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning. Eur J Neurosci 37(5):786–794. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg R, Nachtigall L, Meinzer M, Sieg MM, Flöel A (2013) Differential effects of dual and unihemispheric motor cortex stimulation in older adults. J Neurosci 33(21):9176–9183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis J, Schambra HM, Cohen LG, Buch ER, Fritsch B, Zarahn E, Celnik PA, Krakauer JW (2009) Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(5):1590–1595. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805413106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay S, Larochelle-Brunet F, Lafleur LP, El Mouderrib S, Lepage JF, Théoret H (2016) Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability. Eur J Neurosci 44(5):2184–2190. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13321CrossRefGoogle Scholar