The neural basis of the senses of effort, force and heaviness

  • Uwe ProskeEmail author
  • Trevor Allen


Effort, force and heaviness are related terms, having in common that they are all sensations associated with the generation of voluntary muscle contractions. Traditionally they have been thought to originate in the brain, as a result of copies of motor commands relayed to sensory areas. A stumbling block for the central hypothesis has been the lack of proportionality between the fall in muscle force from fatigue or paralysis and the increase in sensation generated while trying to achieve the required force. In recent times growing evidence has accumulated supporting a role for peripheral sensory receptors, in particular the muscle spindles, as contributing to these sensations. The review discusses the evidence for participation of sensory receptors and what this means for proprioception. In particular, it is not straightforward to envisage how muscle spindles might provide a reliable force signal in a contracting muscle, with or without support from the fusimotor system. An important additional consideration is the method of measurement. It has emerged that there is evidence of a task-dependency in the composition of the afferent signals contributing to the sense of force. The evidence suggests that the signal used in a two-arm force matching task is not the same as in a one-arm task. It will be important, in the future, to try and obtain more direct evidence about the afferent origins of the senses of effort, force and heaviness, how they might change from one task to another and what implications this has for motor control.


Force sense Proprioception Muscle spindle Tendon organ Motor command Efference copy Vibration 



  1. Allen TJ, Ansems GE, Proske U (2008) Evidence from proprioception of fusimotor coactivation during voluntary contractions in humans. Exp Physiol 93:391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastian H (1888) The “muscular sense”; its nature and localization. Brain 10: 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bays PM, Wolpert DM (2007) Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. J Physiol 578:387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell C (1826) On the nervous circle which connects the voluntary muscles with the brain. Phil Trans R Soc 116: 163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blum KP, Lamotte D’Incamps B, Zytnicki D, Ting LH (2017) Force encoding in muscle spindles during stretch of passive muscle. PLoS Comput Biol 13(9):e 1005767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks J, Allen TJ, Proske U (2013) The senses of force and heaviness at the human elbow joint. Exp Brain Res 226:617–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cafarelli E, Bigland-Ritchie B (1979) Sensation of static force in muscles of different length. Exp Neurol 65:511–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cafarelli E, Kostka CE (1981) Effect of vibration on static force sensation in man. Exp Neurol 74:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carson RG, Riek S, Shahbazpour N (2002) Central and peripheral mediation of human force sensation following eccentric or concentric contractions. J Physiol 539:913–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coppin C, Jack J, MacLennan C (1970) A method for the selective electrical activation of tendon organ afferent fibres from the cat soleus muscle. J Physiol 210:18–20Google Scholar
  11. Darling WG, Wall BM, Coffman CR, Capaday C (2018) Pointing to one’s moving hand: putative internal models do not contribute to proprioceptive acuity. Front Hum Neurosci 12:177. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Dimitriou M (2016) Enhanced muscle afferent signals during motor learning in humans. Curr Biol 26:1062–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fallon JB, Macefield VG (2007) Vibration sensitivity of human muscle spindles and golgi tendon organs. Muscle Nerve 36(1):21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franklin DW, Wolpert DM (2011) Computational mechanisms of sensorimotor control. Neuron 72:425–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI (1977a) Changes in motor commands as shown by changes in perceived heaviness during partial curarization and peripheral anaesthesia in man. J Physiol 272:673–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI (1977b) Sensations of heaviness. Brain 100, 345–354Google Scholar
  17. Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI, Potter EK (1980) Alterations in perceived heaviness during digital anaesthesia. J Physiol 306:365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodwin GM, McCloskey DI, Matthews PBC (1972) The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain 95:705–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gregory JE, Proske U (1979) The responses of golgi tendon organs to stimulation of different combinations of motor units. J Physiol 295:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gregory JE, Harvey RJ, Proske U (1977) A ‘late supernormal period’ in the recovery of excitability following an action potential in muscle spindles and tendon organ receptors. J Physiol 271:449–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gregory JE, Morgan DL, Proske U (1988) Responses of cat muscle spindles and errors of limb position sense in man. J Neurophysiol 59(4):1220–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hagbarth K-E, Eklund G (1966) Motor effects of vibratory stimuli in man. In: Muscular afferents and motor control. Wiley, edited by Granit R. London, pp 177–186Google Scholar
  23. Heckman CJ, Condon SM, Hutton RS, Enoka RM (1984) Can Ib axons be selectively activated by electrical stimuli in human subjects? Exp Neurol 86:576–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Helmholtz Hv (1867) Handbuch Der Physiologischen Optik B. III. Leipzig: Voss. English translation, Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics Ed. JPC Southall, Optical Society of America, Rochester, NY, 1924Google Scholar
  25. Jones LA, Hunter IW (1983) Effect of fatigue on force sensation. Exp Neurol 81(3):640–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luu BL, Day BL, Cole JD, Fitzpatrick RC (2011) The fusimotor and reafferent origin of the sense of force and weight. J Physiol 589(13):3135–3147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCloskey DI, Ebeling P, Goodwin GM (1974) Estimation of weights and tensions and apparent involvement of a “sense of effort”. Exptl Neurol 42:220–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCloskey DI, Cross MJ, Honner R, Potter EK (1983) Sensory effects of pulling or vibrating exposed tendons in man. Brain 106(Pt 1):21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McIntyre AK, Proske U, Rawson JA (1984) Cortical projection of afferent information from tendon organs in the cat. J Physiol 354:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Monjo F, Terrier R, Forestier N (2015) Muscle fatigue as an investigative tool in motor control: A review with new insights on internal models and posture-movement coordination. Human Movement Sci 44:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Monjo F, Shemmell J, Forestier N (2018) The sensory origin of the sense of effort is context- dependent. Exp Brain Res. doi. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Müller J (1837) Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen fur Vorlesungen Bonn J. HölscherGoogle Scholar
  33. Pope ZK, Defreitas JM (2015) The effects of acute and prolonged muscle vibration on the function of the muscle spindle’s reflex arc. Somatosens Mot Res 32:254–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Proske U, Gandevia SC (2012) The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signalling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev 92(4):1651–1697. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Proske U, Gandevia SC (2018) Kinesthetic Senses. Compr Physiol 8:1157–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roland PE, Ladegaard-Pedersen H (1977) A quantitative analysis of sensations of tension and of kinaesthesia in man. Evidence for a peripherally originating muscular sense and for a sense of effort. Brain 100:671–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roll JP, Vedel JP, Ribot E (1989) Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study. Exp Brain Res 76:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Savage G, Allen TJ, Proske U (2015) The senses of active and passive forces at the human ankle joint. Exp Brain Res 233:2167–2180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sherrington C (1900) The muscular sense. In: Edinburgh S (ed) Textbook of physiology. Pentland 1900, U.K., pp 1002–1025Google Scholar
  40. Shergill S, Bays PM, Frith CD, Wolpert DM (2003) Two eyes for an eye: the neuroscience of force escalation. Science 301:187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith CM, Albuquerque EX (1967) Differences in the tubocurarine antagonism of the activation of muscle spindle afferents by succinylcholine, acetylcholine and nicotine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 156:573–584PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sperry RW (1950) Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual neural inversion. J Comp Physiol Psychol 43:482–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tsay AJ, Giummarra MJ, Allen TJ, Proske U (2016) The sensory origins of human position sense. J Physiol 594(4):1037–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vallbo AB (1971) Muscle spindle response at the onset of isometric voluntary contractions in man. Time difference between fusimotor and skeletomotor effects. J Physiol 218(2):405–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vallbo AB (1974) Human muscle spindle discharge during isometric voluntary contractions. Amplitude relations between spindle frequency and torque. Acta Physiol Scand 90(2):319–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ (1998) The precision of proprioceptive position sense. Exp Brain Res 122:367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Von Holst H, Mittelstaedt H (1950) The reafference principle. In: Selected papers of Erich von Holst The behavioural physiology of animals and man (1973). Methuen, London, pp 139–173Google Scholar
  48. Weerakkody N, Percival P, Morgan DL, Gregory JE, Proske U (2003) Matching different levels of isometric torque in elbow flexor muscles after eccentric exercise. Exp Brain Res 149(2):141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson LR, Gandevia SC, Burke D (1997) Discharge of human muscle spindle afferents innervating ankle dorsiflexors during target isometric contractions. J Physiol 504:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yamamoto T, Morgan DL, Gregory JE, Proske U (1994) Blockade of intrafusal neuromuscular junctions of cat muscle spindles with gallamine. Exp Physiol 79(3):365–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.Accident Research CentreMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations