The neural correlates of flow experience explored with transcranial direct current stimulation
The experience of flow ensues when humans engage in a demanding task while task demands are balanced with the individual’s level of skill or ability. Here, we further tested the hypothesis that the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) plays a causal role in mediating flow experience using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to interfere with MPFC’s deactivation evoked by a flow paradigm and measured by magnetic resonance (MR)-based perfusion imaging. In a balanced, within-subjects repeated measure design, three treatments of tDCS (sham, anodal, cathodal) were applied in a sample of 22 healthy male participants. tDCS-modulatory effects on flow-specific regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and subjective flow experience significantly depended on participants’ baseline level of flow experience during sham tDCS. Those participants with lower-flow experience during sham tDCS (LF) benefitted from tDCS, particularly from the anodal polarity, whereas both active treatments did not substantially affect subjects with relatively higher baseline flow experience (HF). Functionally, in LF subjects, relative deactivation of the right amygdala got more pronounced under anodal and cathodal tDCS, and changed inconsistently in HF subjects. Inter-individual regression analyses of rCBF data suggested that involvement of the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex appears crucial for affecting the response pattern in the right amygdala and can be modulated by tDCS. Present data support the notion that valuable insights into the neural mechanism of flow can be obtained using tDCS. However, a clearer understanding of tDCS’ baseline dependency in terms of individual variations in brain connectivity states appears a necessary prerequisite to exploit this technique further.
KeywordsFlow experience tDCS Perfusion imaging MPFC Amygdala sgACC
We thank Sabrina Lorenz and Kathrin Brändle for technical assistance, and Bärbel Herrnberger for her helpful contribution to analysis of perfusion imaging data.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X, Günther M, Hendrikse J, Hernandez-Garcia L, Lu H, MacIntosh BJ, Parkes LM, Smits M, van Osch MJ, Wang DJ, Wong EC, Zaharchuk G (2015) Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 73:102–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi M (1975) Beyond boredom and anxiety: experiencing flow in work and play. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- Lang N, Siebner HR, Ernst D, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Lemon RN, Rothwell JC (2004) Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after-effects. Biol Psychiatry 56:634–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Siebner HR, Lang N, Rizzo V, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Lemon RN, Rothwell JC (2004) Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci 24:3379–3385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tseng P, Hsu TY, Chang CF, Tzeng OJ, Hung DL, Muggleton NG, Walsh V, Liang WK, Cheng SK, Juan CH (2012) Unleashing potential: transcranial direct current stimulation over the right posterior parietal cortex improves change detection in low-performing individuals. J Neurosci 32:10554–10561CrossRefGoogle Scholar