Coherence in general and personal semantic knowledge: functional differences of the posterior and centro-parietal N400 ERP component
- 116 Downloads
A growing body of scientific literature investigated the difference between general and personal semantic knowledge. In contrast to general world knowledge, personal semantics comprises highly individual knowledge about oneself. The present study aimed to differentiate processes of integration into personal as opposed to general semantic knowledge. For that purpose, participants were presented with pictures of themselves (Self-condition) or unknown persons (Other-condition) superimposed on a congruent or incongruent background. We hypothesized that self-referential processing is based on automatic retrieval of personal information as opposed to the processing of unknown persons, which requires voluntary, i.e., strategic, attention demanding processing. The topography of the N400 effect varied as a function of the type of semantic knowledge. We found a centro-parietal N400 effect within the Self-condition and a posterior effect within the Other-condition. The voluntary integration of facial expressions of unknown persons within the Other-condition was, furthermore, indexed by an N170 effect. The unresolved tension in personal semantics was reflected by the N500. Our study thus provides new impulses for interpretation of the N400’s functional properties and extends our knowledge about the N500. Implications for the functional properties of the self as an organizational structure are discussed.
KeywordsPersonal semantics General semantics Event-related potentials N170 N400 N500
We thank Matthias Berg, Mareike Harms, Maren-Jo Kater, Leonardo Steenbock and Roberta Schröter for their help in stimulus design and data acquisition.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Coronel JC, Federmeier KD (2016) The N400 reveals how personal semantics is processed_ Insights into the nature and organization of self-knowledge. Neuropsychologia 84(C):36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.029 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- DeLong KA, Quante L, Kutas M (2014) Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia 61(C):150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Featherstone CR, Morrison CM, Waterman MG, MacGregor LJ (2013) Semantics, syntax or neither? A case for resolution in the interpretation of N500 and P600 responses to harmonic incongruities. PLoS One 8(11):e76600. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076600 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Grilli MD, Verfaellie M (2014) Personal semantic memory: Insights from neuropsychological research on amnesia. Neuropsychologia 61:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hassler U, Friese U, Martens U, Trujillo-Barreto N, Gruber T (2013) Repetition priming effects dissociate between miniature eye movements and induced gamma-band responses in the human electroencephalogram. Eur J Neurosci 38(3):2425–2433. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12244 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2011) Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu Rev Psychol 62(1):621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Renoult L, Tanguay A, Beaudry M, Tavakoli P, Rabipour S, Campbell K, Moscovitch M, Levine B, Davidson PS (2016) Personal semantics: is it distinct from episodic and semantic memory? An electrophysiological study of memory for autobiographical facts and repeated events in honor of Shlomo Bentin. Neuropsychologia 83:242–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tulving E (1972) Episodic and semantic memory 1. Academic, Organization of Memory LondonGoogle Scholar