Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 236, Issue 10, pp 2649–2660 | Cite as

Coherence in general and personal semantic knowledge: functional differences of the posterior and centro-parietal N400 ERP component

  • Benjamin Schöne
  • Moritz Köster
  • Thomas Gruber
Research Article
  • 70 Downloads

Abstract

A growing body of scientific literature investigated the difference between general and personal semantic knowledge. In contrast to general world knowledge, personal semantics comprises highly individual knowledge about oneself. The present study aimed to differentiate processes of integration into personal as opposed to general semantic knowledge. For that purpose, participants were presented with pictures of themselves (Self-condition) or unknown persons (Other-condition) superimposed on a congruent or incongruent background. We hypothesized that self-referential processing is based on automatic retrieval of personal information as opposed to the processing of unknown persons, which requires voluntary, i.e., strategic, attention demanding processing. The topography of the N400 effect varied as a function of the type of semantic knowledge. We found a centro-parietal N400 effect within the Self-condition and a posterior effect within the Other-condition. The voluntary integration of facial expressions of unknown persons within the Other-condition was, furthermore, indexed by an N170 effect. The unresolved tension in personal semantics was reflected by the N500. Our study thus provides new impulses for interpretation of the N400’s functional properties and extends our knowledge about the N500. Implications for the functional properties of the self as an organizational structure are discussed.

Keywords

Personal semantics General semantics Event-related potentials N170 N400 N500 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Matthias Berg, Mareike Harms, Maren-Jo Kater, Leonardo Steenbock and Roberta Schröter for their help in stimulus design and data acquisition.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

221_2018_5324_MOESM1_ESM.tiff (12 mb)
Baseline-corrected grand average waveforms (ERPs) for all conditions at sensor sites from FDR analysis: (a) Posterior cluster from N170/Other, (b) Posterior cluster from N400/Other, (c) Central cluster from N400/Self (d) Mid-frontal clusters from N500/Self, (e) Frontal cluster from N500/Other, (f) Frontal cluster from N500/Other (TIFF 12289 KB)

References

  1. Barrett LF, Kensinger EA (2010) Context is routinely encoded during emotion perception. Psychol Sci 21(4):595–599.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363547 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2346101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bluck S, Habermas T (2001) Extending the study of autobiographical memory: thinking back about life across the life span. Rev Gen Psychol 5(2):135–147.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.2.135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL (2008) The brain’s default network. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1124(1):1–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carretie L, Hinojosa JA, Mercado F, Tapia M (2005) Cortical response to subjectively unconscious danger. NeuroImage 24(3):615–623.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter CS, van Veen V (2007) Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: an update of theory and data. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 7(4):367–379.  https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.4.367 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen M, Ma Q, Li M, Lai H, Wang X, Shu L (2010) Cognitive and emotional conflicts of counter-conformity choice in purchasing books online: an event-related potentials study. Biol Psychol 85(3):437–445.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.09.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chwilla DJ, Hagoort P, Brown CM (1998) The mechanism underlying backward priming in a lexical decision task: spreading activation versus semantic matching. Quart J Exp Psychol Sect A 51(3):531–560.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713755773 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conway MA (2005) Memory and the self. J Mem Lang 53(4):594–628.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conway MA, Singer JA, Tagini A (2004) The Self and autobiographical memory: correspondence and coherence. Soc Cogn 22(5):491–529.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.22.5.491.50768 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conway MA, Pothos EM, Turk DJ (2016) The self-relevance system? Cogn Neurosci 7(1–4):20–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Coronel JC, Federmeier KD (2016) The N400 reveals how personal semantics is processed_ Insights into the nature and organization of self-knowledge. Neuropsychologia 84(C):36–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.029 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. DeLong KA, Quante L, Kutas M (2014) Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia 61(C):150–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Dien J, Franklin MS, May CJ (2006) Is “Blank” a suitable neutral prime for event-related potential experiments? Brain Lang 97(1):91–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.08.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Egner T, Hirsch J (2005) Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nat Neurosci 8(12):1784–1790.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1594 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Featherstone CR, Morrison CM, Waterman MG, MacGregor LJ (2013) Semantics, syntax or neither? A case for resolution in the interpretation of N500 and P600 responses to harmonic incongruities. PLoS One 8(11):e76600.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076600 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Franklin MS, Dien J, Neely JH, Huber E, Waterson LD (2007) Semantic priming modulates the N400, N300, and N400RP. Clin Neurophysiol 118(5):1053–1068.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenwald AG (1980) The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. Am Psychol 35(7):603–618.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.7.603 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grilli MD, Verfaellie M (2014) Personal semantic memory: Insights from neuropsychological research on amnesia. Neuropsychologia 61:56–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Groppe DM, Urbach TP, Kutas M (2011) Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review. Psychophysiology 48(12):1711–1725.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01273.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Hannula DE, Federmeier KD, Cohen NJ (2006) Event-related potential signatures of relational memory. J Cogn Neurosci 18(11):1863–1876.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1863 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Hassler U, Friese U, Martens U, Trujillo-Barreto N, Gruber T (2013) Repetition priming effects dissociate between miniature eye movements and induced gamma-band responses in the human electroencephalogram. Eur J Neurosci 38(3):2425–2433.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12244 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Humphreys GW, Sui J (2016) Attentional control and the self: the self-attention network (SAN). Cogn Neurosci 7(1–4):5–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Junghöfer M, Elbert T, Tucker DM, Rockstroh AB (2000) Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. Psychophysiology 37(4):523–532CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kensinger EA (2009) Remembering the details: effects of emotion. Emot Rev 1(2):99–113.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908100432 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Kiefer M (2002) The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects. Cogn Brain Res 13(1):27–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00085-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klein SB, Loftus J (1993) Behavioral experience and trait judgments about the self. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 19(6):740–745.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293196009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koriat A (1981) Semantic facilitation in lexical decision as a function of prime-target association. Mem Cogn 9(6):587–598.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2011) Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu Rev Psychol 62(1):621–647.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Kutas M, Hillyard SA (1982) The lateral distribution of event-related potentials during sentence processing. Neuropsychologia 20(5):579–590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(82)90031-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lieberman MD, Jarcho JM, Satpute AB (2004) Evidence-based and intuition-based self-knowledge: an FMRI study. J Personal Soc Psychol 87(4):421.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.421 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martinelli P, Sperduti M, Piolino P (2012) Neural substrates of the self-memory system: new insights from a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 34(7):1515–1529.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Martınez A, Di Russo F, Anllo-Vento L, Hillyard SA (2001) Electrophysiological analysis of cortical mechanisms of selective attention to high and low spatial frequencies. Clin Neurophysiol 112(11):1980–1998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. McDaniel MA, Einstein GO (2000) Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework. Appl Cogn Psychol 14(7).  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.775 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nairne JS, Thompson SR, Pandeirada JN (2007) Adaptive memory: survival processing enhances retention. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 33(2):263.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.263 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Polezzi D, Lotto L, Daum I, Sartori G, Rumiati R (2008) Predicting outcomes of decisions in the brain. Behav Brain Res 187(1):116–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2007.09.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Posamentier MT, Abdi H (2003) Processing faces and facial expressions. Neuropsychol Rev 13(3):113–143.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025519712569 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Proverbio AM, Riva F (2009) RP and N400 ERP components reflect semantic violations in visual processing of human actions. Neurosci Lett 459(3):142–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.05.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Renoult L, Davidson PSR, Palombo DJ, Moscovitch M, Levine B (2012) Personal semantics: at the crossroads of semantic and episodic memory. Trends Cogn Sci 16(11):550–558.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Renoult L, Tanguay A, Beaudry M, Tavakoli P, Rabipour S, Campbell K, Moscovitch M, Levine B, Davidson PS (2016) Personal semantics: is it distinct from episodic and semantic memory? An electrophysiological study of memory for autobiographical facts and repeated events in honor of Shlomo Bentin. Neuropsychologia 83:242–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Rogers TB, Kuiper NA, Kirker WS (1977) Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. J Personal Soc Psychol 35(9):677.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rossion B, Jacques C (2008) Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170. NeuroImage 39(4):1959–1979.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Schöne B, Schomberg J, Gruber T, Quirin M (2016) Event-related frontal alpha asymmetries: electrophysiological correlates of approach motivation. Exp Brain Res.  https://doi.org/10.2307/40485460 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwarz KA, Wieser MJ, Gerdes ABM, Muhlberger A, Pauli P (2012) Why are you looking like that? How the context influences evaluation and processing of human faces. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 8(4):438–445.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss013 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith NK, Cacioppo JT, Larsen JT, Chartrand TL (2003) May I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli. Neuropsychologia 41(2):171–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Steinbeis N, Koelsch S (2008) Shared neural resources between music and language indicate semantic processing of musical tension-resolution patterns. Cereb Cortex 18(5):1169–1178.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm149 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Symons CS, Johnson BT (1997) The self-reference effect in memory: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 121(3):371.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Tulving E (1972) Episodic and semantic memory 1. Academic, Organization of Memory LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Wade KA, Garry M, Read JD, Lindsay DS (2002) A picture is worth a thousand lies: using false photographs to create false childhood memories. Psychon Bull Rev 9(3):597–603.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196318 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. West WC, Holcomb PJ (2002) Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. Cogn Brain Res 13(3):363–375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00129-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yang J, Li H, Zhang Y, Qiu J, Zhang Q (2007) The neural basis of risky decision-making in a blackjack task. Neuroreport 18(14):1507–1510.  https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282ef7565 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Zeng J, Cao Z, Huang J, Hitchman G, Zhang Q (2014) Predictability influences whether outcomes are processed in terms of original or relative values. Brain Cogn 90:1–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Schöne
    • 1
  • Moritz Köster
    • 2
  • Thomas Gruber
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyOsnabrück UniversityOsnabrückGermany
  2. 2.Institute of PsychologyFree University BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations