Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 236, Issue 3, pp 829–835 | Cite as

Posture modulates the sensitivity of the H-reflex

  • Serpil Cecen
  • Imran Khan Niazi
  • Rasmus Wiberg Nedergaard
  • Alice Cade
  • Kathryn Allen
  • Kelly Holt
  • Heidi Haavik
  • Kemal S. Türker
Research Article


The effect of body posture on the human soleus H-reflex via electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve at the popliteal fossa was studied. All parameters that may influence the reflex were controlled stringently. H-reflexes were elicited in three different body postures while keeping the level of background muscle activation to a minimum. The H-reflex curve relative to the M-wave curve did not change significantly in any of the body postures. However, the maximal H-reflex amplitude significantly increased in the prone position compared with the sitting (p = 0.02) and standing positions (p = 0.01). The background level of electrical activity of the soleus muscle did not significantly change during varying body postures. Together, these findings indicate that the effectiveness of the spindle primary afferent synapse on the soleus motor neuron pool changes significantly in prone position as compared to sitting and standing positions. Given that we have controlled the confounding factors excluding the head position relative to the gravity and the receptors that may be differentially activated at varying body postures such as the proprioceptors, it is concluded that the tonic activity from these receptors may presynaptically interfere with the effectiveness of the spindle primary afferent synapses on the soleus motor neurons.


  1. Aimonetti JM, Vedel J-P, Schmied A, Pagni S (2000) Distribution of presynaptic inhibition on type-identified motoneurones in the extensor carpi radialis pool in man. J Physiol 522:125—135PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Aniss AM, Diener HC, Hore J, Burke D, Gandevia SC (1990) Reflex activation of muscle spindles in human pretibial muscles during standing. J Neurophysiol 64:671–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aniss AM, Gandevia SC, Burke D (1992) Reflex responses in active muscles elicited by stimulation of low-threshold afferents from the human foot. J Neurophysiol 67;1375–1384Google Scholar
  4. Billot M, Simoneau EM, Van Hoecke J, Martin A (2010) Age-related relative increases in electromyography activity and torque according to the maximal capacity during upright standing. Eur J Appl Physiol 109:669–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinkworth RSA, Tuncer M, Tucker K, Jaberzadeh S, Türker KS (2007) Standardization of H-reflex analyses. J Neurosci Meth 162:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cattagni T, Martin A, Scaglioni G (2014) Is spinal excitability of the triceps surae mainly affected by muscle activity or body position? J Neurophysiol 111:2525–2532CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dakin CJ, Heroux ME, Luu BL, Inglis JM, Blouin J-S (2016) Vestibular contribution to balance control in the medial gastrocnemius and soleus. J Neurophysiol 115:1289–1297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fox A, Koceja D (2017) Static otolithic drive alters presynaptic inhibition in soleus motor pool. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 32:37–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Heckman CJ, Binder MD (1988) Analysis of steady-state effective synaptic currents generated by homonymous Ia afferent fibers in motoneurons of the cat. J Neurophysiol 60:1946–1966CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Knikou M (2008) The H-reflex as a probe: pathways and pitfalls. J Neurosci Meth 171:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knikou M, Rymer WZ (2003) Static and dynamic changes in body orientation modulate spinal reflex excitability in humans. Exp Brain Res 152:466–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kyung-Min K, Hart JM, Hertel J (2013) Influence of body position on fibularis longus and soleus Hoffmann reflexes. Gait Posture 37:138–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lowrey CR, Bent LR (2009) Modulation of the soleus H-reflex following galvanic vestibular stimulation and cutaneous stimulation in prone human subjects. Muscle Nerve 40:213–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Miles TS, Türker KS (1986) Does reflex inhibition of motor units follow the “Size Principle”? Exp Brain Res 62:443–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Morita H, Petersen N, Christensen LO, Sinkjaer T, Nielsen J (1998) Sensitivity of H-reflexes and stretch reflexes to presynaptic inhibition in humans. J Neurophysiol 80:610–620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mynark RG (2005) Reliability of the soleus H-reflex from supine to standing in young and elderly. Clin Neurophysiol 116:1400–1404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Scarpini C, Mazzocchio R, Mondelli M, Nuti D, Rossi A (1991) Changes in alpha motoneuron excitability of the soleus muscle in relation to vestibular stimulation assessed by angular acceleration in man. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 53:100–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Schieppati M (1987) The Hoffmann reflex: a means of assessing spinal reflex excitability and its descending control in man. Prog Neurobiol 28:345–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Shimba S, Kawashima N, Ohta Y, Yamamoto S-I, Nakazawa K (2010) Enhanced stretch reflex excitability in the soleus muscle during passive standing posture in humans. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 20:406–412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Stein RB, Estabrooks KL, m McGie S, Roth MJ, Jones KE (2007) Quantifying the effects of voluntary contraction and inter-stimulus interval on the human soleus H-reflex. Exp Brain Res 182:309–319CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Strzalkowski ND, Mildren RL, Bent LR (2015) Thresholds of cutaneous afferents related to perceptual threshold across the human foot sole. J Neurophysiol 114:2144–2151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Traccis S, Rosati G, Patraskakis S, Bissakou M, Sau GF, Aiello I (1987) Influences of neck receptors on soleus motoneuron excitability in man. Exp Neurol 95:76–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Trimble MH (1998) Postural modulation of the segmental reflex: effect of body tilt and postural sway. Int J Neurosci 95:85–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Trulsson M (2001) Mechanoreceptive afferents in the human sural nerve. Exp Brain Res 137:111–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Türker KS (1988) A method for standardization of silent period measurements in human masseter muscle. J Oral Rehab 15:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marmara University Pendik Research and Training HospitalIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Center for Chiropractic ResearchNew Zealand College of ChiropracticAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Department of Health Science and TechnologyAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
  4. 4.Health and Rehabilitation Research InstituteAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand
  5. 5.Koç University School of MedicineIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations