Responsibility is a necessary prerequisite in the experience of regret. The present fMRI study investigated the modulation of responsibility on the neural correlates of regret during a sequential risk-taking task. Participants were asked to open a series of boxes consecutively and decided when to stop. Each box contained a reward, except for one containing a devil to zero participant’s gain in the trial. Once participants stopped, both collected gains and missed chances were revealed. We manipulated responsibility by setting two different contexts. In the Self (high responsibility) context, participants opened boxes and decided when to stop by themselves. In the Computer (low responsibility) context, a computer program opened boxes and decided when to stop for participants. Before each trial, participants were required to decide whether it would be a Self or a Computer context. Behaviorally, participants felt less regret (more relief) for gain outcome and more regret for the loss outcome in the high-responsibility context than low responsibility context. At the neural level, when experiencing a gain, high-responsibility trials were characterized by stronger activation in mPFC, pgACC, mOFC, and striatum with decreasing number of missed chances relative to low responsibility trials. When experiencing a loss, low responsibility trials were associated with stronger activation in dACC and bilateral insula than high-responsibility trials. Conversely, during a loss, high-responsibility trials showed more striatum activity than low responsibility trials. These results highlighted the sensitivity of the frontal region, striatum, and insula to changes in level of responsibility.
fMRI Decision making Responsibility Striatum Regret
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271090; 71371180]; the National Education Research Project of China [CBA160186]; and the Key Program of the National Social Science Foundation of China [14AZD106].
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Boles TL, Messick DM (1995) A reverse outcome bias: the influence of multiple reference points on the evaluation of outcomes and decisions. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 61:262–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brassen S, Gamer M, Peters J, Gluth S, Christian Büchel (2012) Don’t look back in anger! Responsiveness to missed chances in successful and nonsuccessful aging. Science 336:1217516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büchel C, Brassen S, Yacubian J, Kalisch R, Sommer T (2011) Ventral striatal signal changes represent missed opportunities and predict future choice. Neuroimage 57:1124–1130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Camille N, Pironti VA, Dodds CM, Aitken MR, Robbins TW, Clark L (2010) Striatal sensitivity to personal responsibility in a regret-based decision-making task. Cognit Affect Behav Neurosci 10:460–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar PVS, Capra CM, Moore S, Noussair C, Berns GS (2008) Neurobiological regret and rejoice functions for aversive outcomes. Neuroimage 39:1472–1484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Chang LJ, Sanfey AG (2013) Great expectations: neural computations underlying the use of social norms in decision-making. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 8:277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Civai C, Crescentini C, Rustichini A, Rumiati RI (2012) Equality versus self-interest in the brain: differential roles of anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage 62:102–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Connolly T, Zeelenberg M (2002) Regret in decision making. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 11(215):212–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly T, Ordóñez LD, Coughlan R (1997) Regret and responsibility in the evaluation of decision outcomes. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 70:73–85 (As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under “Related research” (further below) orfor a different version of it)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Rogers RD, Ramnani N, Mackay C, Wilson JL, Jezzard P, Carter CS, Smith SM (2004) Distinct portions of anterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex are activated by reward processing in separable phases of decision-making cognition. Biol Psychiatry 55:594–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Wu H, Luo Y, Feng C (2016) Neural signatures of social conformity: a coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 71:101–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
1.School of Psychology and Cognitive ScienceEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
2.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Department of PhysicsEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
3.Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics, Ministry of Education, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics, School of Psychology and Cognitive ScienceEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
4.National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology EducationEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina