Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 236, Issue 2, pp 619–628 | Cite as

Fall risk during opposing stance perturbations among healthy adults and chronic stroke survivors

  • Prakruti J. Patel
  • Tanvi BhattEmail author
Research Article


Studies examining recovery from SLIPS and TRIPS indicate higher incidence of falls during SLIPS than TRIPS however, differences in the recovery mechanisms during these opposing perturbations have not been examined. We therefore aimed to compare the reactive balance responses contributing to fall risk during SLIPS and TRIPS at comparable perturbation intensity among community-dwelling healthy adults and chronic stroke survivors. Younger adults (N = 11), age-matched adults (N = 11) and chronic stroke survivors (N = 12) were exposed to a single SLIP and TRIP through a motorized treadmill (16 m/s2 , 0.20 m). Center of mass (COM) state stability was measured by recording COM position and velocity relative to base of support, i.e., COM/BOS and COM/BOS, respectively. Trunk and compensatory step kinematics were also recorded. During SLIPS, the incidence of falls among stroke survivors was greater than healthy adults (53.83% vs. 0%), however not for TRIPS. All groups showed higher change in postural stability from liftoff to touchdown during TRIPS than SLIPS. Among healthy adults higher change in COM/BOS during TRIPS was accompanied by the ability to control trunk flexion at step touchdown and lower peak trunk velocity as compared with SLIPS, with no significant differences in compensatory step length between the perturbations (p > 0.05). Chronic stroke survivors increased compensatory step length during TRIPS versus SLIPS (p < 0.05) contributing to greater stability change. They were unable to control trunk excursion and peak trunk velocity as compared with the healthy adults leading to lower stability than healthy younger and age-matched adults during SLIPS and lower stability than younger adults during TRIPS. Difficulty in trunk control during SLIPS among all individuals and compensatory step length  among stroke survivors emphasizes higher fall risk for SLIPS than TRIPS among these populations.


Hemiparesis Reactive balance Older adults Stability 



This study was supported by the American Heart Association, Scientific Development grant (12SDG12170022). The authors would like to thank Abdul Karim, Harish Reddy and Juana Villagomez for assistance with data processing.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.


  1. Batchelor FA, Hill KD, Mackintosh SF, Said CM, Whitehead CH (2012) Effects of a multifactorial falls prevention program for people with stroke returning home after rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93:1648–1655. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhatt T, Wening JD, Pai YC (2006) Adaptive control of gait stability in reducing slip-related backward loss of balance. Exp Brain Res 170:61–73. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhatt T, Espy D, Yang F, Pai YC (2011) Dynamic gait stability, clinical correlates, and prognosis of falls among community-dwelling older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92:799–805. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatt T, Yang F, Pai YC (2012) Learning to resist gait-slip falls: long-term retention in community-dwelling older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93:557–564. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Blouin JS, Inglis JT, Siegmund GP (2006) Auditory startle alters the response of human subjects exposed to a single whiplash-like perturbation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:146–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carbonneau E, Smeesters C (2014) Effects of age and lean direction on the threshold of single-step balance recovery in younger, middle-aged and older adults. Gait Posture 39:365–371. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Crenshaw JR, Rosenblatt NJ, Hurt CP, Grabiner MD (2012) The discriminant capabilities of stability measures, trunk kinematics, and step kinematics in classifying successful and failed compensatory stepping responses by young adults. J Biomech 45:129–133. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis RB III, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR (1991) A gait data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci 10:575–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feng H (1999) Limits of stability and postural sway in young and older people. Master’s thesis, Queen’s University, Ontario, pp 52–55Google Scholar
  10. Grabiner MD, Donovan S, Bareither ML, Marone JR, Hamstra-Wright K, Gatts S, Troy KL (2008) Trunk kinematics and fall risk of older adults: translating biomechanical results to the clinic. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 18:197–204. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Han J, Betker AL, Szturm T, Moussavi Z (2006) Estimation of the center of body mass during forward stepping using body acceleration. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:4564–4567. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris JE, Eng JJ, Marigold DS, Tokuno CD, Louis CL (2005) Relationship of balance and mobility to fall incidence in people with chronic stroke. Phys Ther 85:150–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hof AL (2008) The ‘extrapolated center of mass’ concept suggests a simple control of balance in walking. Hum Mov Sci 27:112–125. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Honeycutt CF, Nevisipour M, Grabiner MD (2016) Characteristics and adaptive strategies linked with falls in stroke survivors from analysis of laboratory-induced falls. J Biomech. PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsiao ET, Robinovitch SN (1998) Common protective movements govern unexpected falls from standing height. J Biomech 31:1–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hsiao-Wecksler ET (2008) Biomechanical and age-related differences in balance recovery using the tether-release method. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 18:179–187. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS (1999) Stroke. Neurologic and functional recovery the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 10:887–906PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jung K, Kim Y, Chung Y, Hwang S (2014) Weight-shift training improves trunk control, proprioception, and balance in patients with chronic hemiparetic stroke. Tohoku J Exp Med 232:195–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kajrolkar T, Bhatt T (2016) Falls-risk post-stroke: Examining contributions from paretic versus non paretic limbs to unexpected forward gait slips. J Biomech 49:2702–2708. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kajrolkar T, Yang F, Pai YC, Bhatt T (2014) Dynamic stability and compensatory stepping responses during anterior gait–slip perturbations in people with chronic hemiparetic stroke. J Biomech 47(11):2751–2758. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lamb SE, Ferrucci L, Volapto S, Fried LP, Guralnik JM, Women’s H, Aging S (2003) Risk factors for falling in home-dwelling older women with stroke: the Women’s Health and Aging Study. Stroke 34:494–501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lockhart TE, Woldstad JC, Smith JL (2003) Effects of age-related gait changes on the biomechanics of slips and falls. Ergonomics 46:1136–1160. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Lubetzky-Vilnai A, Kartin D (2010) The effect of balance training on balance performance in individuals poststroke: a systematic review. J Neurol Phys Ther 34:127–137. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Maki BE, McIlroy WE (1997) The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the “change-in-support” strategy. Phys Ther 77:488–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mansfield A, Inness EL, Wong JS, Fraser JE, McIlroy WE (2013) Is impaired control of reactive stepping related to falls during inpatient stroke rehabilitation? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 27:526–533. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Marigold DS, Patla AE (2002) Strategies for dynamic stability during locomotion on a slippery surface: effects of prior experience and knowledge. J Neurophysiol 88:339–353. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Newton RA (2001) Validity of the multi-directional reach test: a practical measure for limits of stability in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M248–M252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pai YC, Iqbal K (1999) Simulated movement termination for balance recovery: can movement strategies be sought to maintain stability in the presence of slipping or forced sliding? J Biomech 32:779–786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pai YC, Wening JD, Runtz EF, Iqbal K, Pavol MJ (2003) Role of feedforward control of movement stability in reducing slip-related balance loss and falls among older adults. J Neurophysiol 90:755–762. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Parijat P, Lockhart TE (2012) Effects of moveable platform training in preventing slip-induced falls in older adults. Ann Biomed Eng 40:1111–1121. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Patel P, Bhatt T (2015) Adaptation to large-magnitude treadmill-based perturbations: improvements in reactive balance response. Physiol Rep 3
  32. Pavol MJ, Pai YC (2002) Feedforward adaptations are used to compensate for a potential loss of balance. Exp Brain Res 145:528–538. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pavol MJ, Owings TM, Foley KT, Grabiner MD (1999) Gait characteristics as risk factors for falling from trips induced in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 54:M583–M590CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Redfern MS, Cham R, Gielo-Perczak K et al (2001) Biomechanics of slips. Ergonomics 44:1138–1166. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Salot P, Patel P, Bhatt T (2016) Reactive balance in individuals with chronic stroke: biomechanical factors related to perturbation-induced backward falling. Phys Ther 96:338–347. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Siegmund GP, Blouin JS, Inglis JT (2008) Does startle explain the exaggerated first response to a transient perturbation? Exerc Sport Sci Rev 36:76–82. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Srivastava A, Taly AB, Gupta A, Kumar S, Murali T (2009) Post-stroke balance training: role of force platform with visual feedback technique. J Neurol Sci 287:89–93. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tan JS, Eng JJ, Robinovitch SN, Warnick B (2006) Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing. J Biomech 39:1804–1811. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Tantisuwat A, Chamonchant D, Boonyong S (2014) Multi-directional reach test: an investigation of the limits of stability of people aged between 20–79 years. J Phys Ther Sci 26:877–880. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang F, Bhatt T, Pai YC (2009) Role of stability and limb support in recovery against a fall following a novel slip induced in different daily activities. J Biomech 42:1903–1908. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Yatar GI, Yildirim SA (2015) Wii Fit balance training or progressive balance training in patients with chronic stroke: a randomised controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci 27:1145–1151. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical Therapy 514-EUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations