Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task
Reflecting the discrepancy between received and predicted outcomes, the reward prediction error (RPE) plays an important role in learning in a dynamic environment. A number of studies suggested that the feedback-related negativity (FRN) component of an event-related potential, known to be associated with unexpected outcomes, encodes RPEs. While FRN was clearly shown to be sensitive to the probability of outcomes, the effect of outcome magnitude on FRN remains to be further clarified. In studies on the neural underpinnings of reward anticipation and outcome evaluation, a monetary incentive delay (MID) task proved to be particularly useful. We investigated whether feedback-locked FRN and cue-locked dN200 responses recorded during an auditory MID task were sensitive to the probability and magnitude of outcomes. The cue-locked dN200 is associated with the update of information about the magnitude of prospective outcomes. Overall, we showed that feedback-locked FRN was modulated by both the magnitude and the probability of outcomes during an auditory version of MID task, whereas no such effect was found for cue-locked dN200. Furthermore, the cue-locked dN200, which is associated with the update of information about the magnitude of prospective outcomes, correlated with the standard feedback-locked FRN, which is associated with a negative RPE. These results further expand our knowledge on the interplay between the processing of predictive cues that forecast future outcomes and the subsequent revision of these predictions during outcome delivery.
KeywordsFeedback-related negativity N200 Monetary incentive delay task Electroencephalography
The study was supported by Grant 16-18-00065 of the Russian Science Foundation.
- Agam Y, Hämäläinen MS, Lee AKC, Dyckman KA, Friedman JS, Isom M et al (2011) Multimodal neuroimaging dissociates hemodynamic and electrophysiological correlates of error processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:17556–17561. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103475108 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Bellebaum C, Polezzi D, Daum I (2010) It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations. Neuropsychologia 48:3343–3350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Broyd SJ, Richards HJ, Helps SK, Chronaki G, Bamford S, Sonuga-Barke EJS (2012) An electrophysiological monetary incentive delay (e-MID) task: a way to decompose the different components of neural response to positive and negative monetary reinforcement. J Neurosci Methods 209:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.05.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hauser TU, Iannaccone R, Stampfli P, Drechsler R, Brandeis D, Walitza S et al (2014) The feedback-related negativity (FRN) revisited: new insights into the localization, meaning and network organization. Neuroimage 84:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kreussel L, Hewig J, Kretschmer N, Hecht H, Coles MGH, Miltner WHR (2012) The influence of the magnitude, probability, and valence of potential wins and losses on the amplitude of the feedback negativity. Psychophysiology 49:207–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01291.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marco-Pallares J, Cucurell D, Cunillera T, García R, Andrés-Pueyo A, Münte TF et al (2008) Human oscillatory activity associated to reward processing in a gambling task. Neuropsychologia 46:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walsh MM, Anderson JR (2010) Neural correlates of temporal credit assignment. In: 10th International conference on cognitive modeling, ICCM 2010, pp 265–270. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84877757970&partnerID=40&md5=f6112d2887e8eb943b50b3e8554a8831