The speed-curvature power law of movements: a reappraisal
Several types of curvilinear movements obey approximately the so called 2/3 power law, according to which the angular speed varies proportionally to the 2/3 power of the curvature. The origin of the law is debated but it is generally thought to depend on physiological mechanisms. However, a recent paper (Marken and Shaffer, Exp Brain Res 88:685–690, 2017) claims that this power law is simply a statistical artifact, being a mathematical consequence of the way speed and curvature are calculated. Here we reject this hypothesis by showing that the speed-curvature power law of biological movements is non-trivial. First, we confirm that the power exponent varies with the shape of human drawing movements and with environmental factors. Second, we report experimental data from Drosophila larvae demonstrating that the power law does not depend on how curvature is calculated. Third, we prove that the law can be violated by means of several mathematical and physical examples. Finally, we discuss biological constraints that may underlie speed-curvature power laws discovered in empirical studies.
KeywordsMotor control Drawing Two-thirds power law Statistical analysis
The authors declare no competing financial interests. The work was supported by the Italian Space Agency (grant n. I/006/06/0 to F.L. and grant n. 2014-008-R.0 to M.Z.), the Italian University Ministry (PRIN grant 2015HFWRYY_002 to F.L.), the Spanish Ministry of Economy and the Severo Ochoa Center of Excellence programs (SEV-2013-0317 start-up funds to A.G.-M., grant BFU-2015-74241-JIN to A.G.-M., and pre-doctoral contract BES-2016-077608 to A.M.). Tamar Flash is an incumbent of Dr. Haim Moross professorial chair. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions.
- de’Sperati C, Viviani P (1997) The relationship between curvature and speed in two-dimensional smooth pursuit eye movements. J Neurosci 17:3932–3945Google Scholar
- Guggenheimer HW (1977) Differential geometry. Dover, New York, p 378Google Scholar
- Huh D (2015) The vector space of convex curves: how to mix shapes. arXiv:1506.07515
- Lacquaniti F, Terzuolo C, Viviani P (1984) Global metric properties and preparatory processes in drawing movements. In: Kornblum S, Requin J (eds) Preparatory states and processes. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 357–370Google Scholar
- Maoz U, Portugaly E, Flash T, Weiss Y (2006) Noise and the 2/3 power law. Adv Neural Inf Proc Syst 18:851–858Google Scholar
- Struik DJ (2012) Lectures on classical differential geometry. Dover Publ, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- West G (2017) Scale. Penguin, New York, p 479Google Scholar
- Wolpert DM, Pearson KG, Ghez CPJ (2013) The organization and planning of movement. Princ Neural Sci 5:743–766Google Scholar
- Wooldridge JM (2012) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, pp 88–93Google Scholar