How humans maintain balance and change postural control due to age, injury, immobility or training is one of the basic questions in motor control. One of the problems in understanding postural control is the large set of degrees of freedom in the human motor system. Therefore, a self-organizing map (SOM), a type of artificial neural network, was used in the present study to extract and visualize information about high-dimensional balance strategies before and after a 6-week slackline training intervention. Thirteen subjects performed a flamingo and slackline balance task before and after the training while full body kinematics were measured. Range of motion, velocity and frequency of the center of mass and joint angles from the pelvis, trunk and lower leg (45 variables) were calculated and subsequently analyzed with an SOM. Subjects increased their standing time significantly on the flamingo (average +2.93 s, Cohen’s d = 1.04) and slackline (+9.55 s, d = 3.28) tasks, but the effect size was more than three times larger in the slackline. The SOM analysis, followed by a k-means clustering and marginal homogeneity test, showed that the balance coordination pattern was significantly different between pre- and post-test for the slackline task only (χ2 = 82.247; p < 0.001). The shift in balance coordination on the slackline could be characterized by an increase in range of motion and a decrease in velocity and frequency in nearly all degrees of freedom simultaneously. The observation of low transfer of coordination strategies to the flamingo task adds further evidence for the task-specificity principle of balance training, meaning that slackline training alone will be insufficient to increase postural control in other challenging situations.
Balance training Coordination Transfer Slackline Self-organizing map
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We like to thank Medi-Lines for providing the Slackbase free of charge to conduct the experiments and the training, and Thomas Konzett for assisting at the measurements.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest that may have biased the findings in this article.
Bartlett RM, Lamb PF, O’Donovan D, Kennedy G (2014) Use of self-organizing maps for exploring coordination variability in the transition between walking and running. Int J Comp Psychol 27:123–137. doi:10.5811/westjem.2011.5.6700Google Scholar
Donath L, Roth R, Zahner L, Faude O (2016) Slackline training and neuromuscular performance in seniors: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Med Sci Sport 26:275–283. doi:10.1111/sms.12423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hüfner K, Binetti C, Hamilton DA et al (2011) Structural and functional plasticity of the hippocampal formation in professional dancers and slackliners. Hippocampus 21:855–865. doi:10.1002/hipo.20801PubMedGoogle Scholar
Peterka RJ (2002) Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol 88:1097–1118PubMedGoogle Scholar
Pfusterschmied J, Buchecker M, Keller M et al (2013) Supervised slackline training improves postural stability. Eur J Sport Sci 13:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrien B, Clijsen R, Anders S et al (2016) Intra-seasonal variability of ball speed and coordination of two team-handball throwing techniques in elite male adolescent players. Int J Comput Sci Sport 15:1–29. doi:10.1515/ijcss-2016-0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Diest M, Stegenga J, Wörtche HJ et al (2015) Quantifying postural control during exergaming using multivariate whole-body movement data: a self-organizing maps approach. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134350Google Scholar
Vesanto J, Himberg J, Alhoniemi E, Parhankangas J (2000) SOM toolbox for Matlab 5Google Scholar
Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P et al (2002) ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip and spine. J Biomech 35:543–548. doi:10.1006/rtph.2002.1549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Wu G, van der Helm FCT, Veeger HEJDJ et al (2005) ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech 38:981–992. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar