Abstract
Task difficulty affects both gaze behavior and hand movements. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate how task difficulty modulates gaze behaviour with respect to the balance between visually monitoring the ongoing action and prospectively collecting visual information about the future course of the ongoing action. For this, we examined sequences of reach and transport movements of water glasses that differed in task difficulty using glasses filled to different levels. Participants had to grasp water glasses with different filling levels (100, 94, 88, 82, and 76%) and transport them to a target. Subsequently, they had to grasp the next water glass and transport it to a target on the opposite side. Results showed significant differences in both gaze and movement kinematics for higher filling levels. However, there were no relevant differences between the 88, 82, and 76% filling levels. Results revealed a significant influence of task difficulty on the interaction between gaze and kinematics during transport and a strong influence of task difficulty on gaze during the release phase between different grasp-to-place movements. In summary, we found a movement and gaze pattern revealing an influence of task difficulty that was especially evident for the later phases of transport and release.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ballard DH, Hayhoe MM, Li F, Whitehead SD (1992) Hand–eye coordination during sequential tasks. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 337:331–338
Bowman MC, Johannson RS, Flanagan JR (2009) Eye-hand coordination in a sequential target contact task. Exp Brain Res 195(2):273–283. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1781-x
Brouwer A, Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR (2009) Differences in fixations between grasping and viewing objects. J Vision 9(1):1–24. doi:10.1167/9.1.18
Desmurget M, Pélisson D, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C (1998) From eye to hand: planning goal-directed movements. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22(6):761–788. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(98),00004-9
Eastough D, Edwards MG (2007) Movement kinematics in prehension are affected by grasping objects of different mass. Exp Brain Res 176:193–198
Flanagan JR, Johansson RS (2003) Action plans used in action observation. Nature 424:769–771. doi:10.1038/nature01861
Flanagan JR, Bowman MC, Johansson RS (2006) Control strategies in object manipulation tasks. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16(6):650–659. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.10.005
Hayhoe MM, Ballard D (2005) Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(4):188–194. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.009
Henriques DY, Klier EM, Smith MA, Lowy D, Crawford JD (1998) Gaze-centered remapping of remembered visual space in an open-loop pointing task. J Neurosci 18(4):1583–1594
Jeannerod M (1986) Mechanisms of visuomotor coordination: a study in normal and brain damaged subjects. Neuropsychologia 24(1):41–78
Jeannerod M, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G, Sakata H (1995) Grasping objets: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends Neurosci 18(7):314–320
Johansson RS, Westling G, Bäckström A, Flanagan R (2001) Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. J Neurosci 21(17):6917–6932
Land MF (2009) Vision, eye movements, and natural behavior. Vis Neurosci 26(1):51–62. doi:10.1017/S0952523808080899
Land MF, McLeod P (2000) From eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball. Nat Neurosci 3(12):1340–1345. doi:10.1038/81887
Land MF, Tatler B (2009) Looking and acting: Vision and eye movements in natural behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570943.001.0001
Land MF, Mennie N, Rusted J (1999) The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception 28(11):1311–1328. doi:10.1068/p2935
Latash ML, Jaric S (2002) Organization of drinking: postural characteristics of arm-head coordination. J Mot Behav 34(2):139–150. doi:10.1080/00222890209601936
Napier JR (1956) The prehensile movements of the human hand. J Bone Joint Surg 38(B):902–913. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-5451-8_85
Neggers SFW, Bekkering H (2000) Ocular gaze is anchored to the target of an ongoing pointing movement. J Neurophysiol 83:639–651
Rand MK, Stelmach GE (2011) Effects of hand termination and accuracy requirements on eye-hand coordination in older adults. Behav Brain Res 219(1):39–46. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.12.008
Rotman G, Troje NF, Johansson RS, Flanagan JR (2006) Eye movements when observing predictable and unpredictable actions. J Neurophysiol 96(3):1358–1369. doi:10.1152/jn.00227.2006
Savelsbergh GJ, Whiting HT, Bootsma RJ (1991) Grasping tau. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17(2):315–322. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.17.2.315
Smeets JBJ, Brenner E (2006) 10 Years of Illusions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32(6):1501–1504. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1501
Smeets JB, Hayhoe MM, Ballard DH (1996) Goal-directed arm movements change eye-head coordination. Exp Brain Res 109(3):434–440. doi:10.1007/BF00229627
Voudouris D, Brenner E, Schot WD, Smeets JBJ (2010) Does planning a different trajectory influence the choice of grasping points? Exp Brain Res 206(1):15–24. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2382-4
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) funded Collaborative Research Center on “Cardinal Mechanisms of Perception” (SFB-TRR 135).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kurz, J., Hegele, M., Reiser, M. et al. Impact of task difficulty on gaze behavior in a sequential object manipulation task. Exp Brain Res 235, 3479–3486 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5062-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5062-9