Exploring the temporal dynamics of sustained and transient spatial attention using steady-state visual evoked potentials
- 417 Downloads
While the behavioral dynamics as well as the functional network of sustained and transient attention have extensively been studied, their underlying neural mechanisms have most often been investigated in separate experiments. In the present study, participants were instructed to perform an audio–visual spatial attention task. They were asked to attend to either the left or the right hemifield and to respond to deviant transient either auditory or visual stimuli. Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) elicited by two task irrelevant pattern reversing checkerboards flickering at 10 and 15 Hz in the left and the right hemifields, respectively, were used to continuously monitor the locus of spatial attention. The amplitude and phase of the SSVEPs were extracted for single trials and were separately analyzed. Sustained attention to one hemifield (spatial attention) as well as to the auditory modality (intermodal attention) increased the inter-trial phase locking of the SSVEP responses, whereas briefly presented visual and auditory stimuli decreased the single-trial SSVEP amplitude between 200 and 500 ms post-stimulus. This transient change of the single-trial amplitude was restricted to the SSVEPs elicited by the reversing checkerboard in the spatially attended hemifield and thus might reflect a transient re-orienting of attention towards the brief stimuli. Thus, the present results demonstrate independent, but interacting neural mechanisms of sustained and transient attentional orienting.
KeywordsSteady-state visual evoked potential Spatial attention Sustained attention Transient attentional orienting
Compliance with ethical standards
The Sino-German Research Training Group CINACS, German Research Foundation (DFG GK 1247/1) and DFG TRR 169/1 Crossmodal Learning, National Key Research and Development Plan of China under Grant No. 2016YFB1001200 and Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (2014z21043).
- Hillyard SA, Simpson GV, Woods DL, VanVoorhis S, Münte TF (1984) Event-related brain potentials and selective attention to different modalities. In: Reinoso-Suarez F, Ajmone-Marsan C (eds) Cortical integration. Raven Press, New York, pp 395–414Google Scholar
- Jonides J (1981) Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. Atten Perform IX(9):187–203Google Scholar
- Lopes da Silva FH (1998) Event-related potentials: methodology and quantification. In: Niedermeyer E, Lopes da Silva FH (eds) Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications and related fields, 4th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 947–957Google Scholar
- Norcia AM, Appelbaum LG, Ales JM, Cottereau BR, Rossion B (2015) The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: a review. J Vis 15(6): 4, 1–46.Google Scholar
- Posner MI, Cohen Y (1984) Components of visual orienting. Atten Perform X Control Lang Process 32:531–556.Google Scholar
- Regan D (1989) Human brain electrophysiology: evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Zhu D, Bieger J, Molina GG, Aarts RM (2010) A survey of stimulation methods used in SSVEP-based BCIs. Comput Intell Neurosci 1:702357Google Scholar