Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 235, Issue 4, pp 995–1005 | Cite as

Syncopation affects free body-movement in musical groove

  • Maria A. G. Witek
  • Tudor Popescu
  • Eric F. Clarke
  • Mads Hansen
  • Ivana Konvalinka
  • Morten L. Kringelbach
  • Peter Vuust
Research Article

Abstract

One of the most immediate and overt ways in which people respond to music is by moving their bodies to the beat. However, the extent to which the rhythmic complexity of groove—specifically its syncopation—contributes to how people spontaneously move to music is largely unexplored. Here, we measured free movements in hand and torso while participants listened to drum-breaks with various degrees of syncopation. We found that drum-breaks with medium degrees of syncopation were associated with the same amount of acceleration and synchronisation as low degrees of syncopation. Participants who enjoyed dancing made more complex movements than those who did not enjoy dancing. While for all participants hand movements accelerated more and were more complex, torso movements were more synchronised to the beat. Overall, movements were mostly synchronised to the main beat and half-beat level, depending on the body-part. We demonstrate that while people do not move or synchronise much to rhythms with high syncopation when dancing spontaneously to music, the relationship between rhythmic complexity and synchronisation is less linear than in simple finger-tapping studies.

Keywords

Music Movement Rhythm Syncopation Groove Synchronisation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Center for Music in the Brain is funded by the Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF117). IK is funded by the Danish Council for Independent Research—Technology and Production Sciences. Financial support to TP was in part provided by the Zukunftskonzept at TU Dresden funded by the Exzellenzinitiative of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. MLK is supported by the ERC Consolidator Grant: CAREGIVING (n. 615539). We thank Kristian Nymoen and Birgitta Burger for help with the analysis.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional and/or National Research Committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Supplementary material

221_2016_4855_MOESM1_ESM.docx (396 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 396 kb)

References

  1. Bennett R (1969) The intrinsic dimensionality of signal collections. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 15:517–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berlyne DE (1971) Aesthetics and psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, East NorwalkGoogle Scholar
  3. Burger B, Toiviainen P (2013) MoCap Toolbox: a matlab toolbox for computational analysis of movement data. In: Proceedings of 10th sound and music computing conference (SMC), Stockholm, Sweden Berlin: Logos VerlagGoogle Scholar
  4. Burger B, Saarikallio S, Luck G, Thompson MR, Toiviainen P (2013a) Relationships between perceived emotions in music and music-induced movement. Music Percept 30:517–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burger B, Thompson MR, Luck G, Saarikallio S, Toiviainen P (2013b) Influences of rhythm- and timbre-related musical features on characteristics of music-induced movement. Front Psychol 4:183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen JL, Zatorre RJ, Penhune VB (2008) Moving on time: brain network for auditory-motor synchronization is modulated by rhythm complexity and musical training. J Cogn Neurosci 20:226–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark A (2008) Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke EF (1999) Rhythm and timing in music. In: Deutsch D (ed) The psychology of music, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitch WT, Rosenfeld AJ (2007) Perception and production of syncopated rhythms. Music Percept 25:43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fraisse P (1963) The psychology of time. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Fraisse P (1982) Rhythm and tempo. In: Deutsch D (ed) The psychology of music, 1st edn. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Honing H (2012) Without it no music: beat induction as a fundamental musical trait. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1252:85–91. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06402.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Janata P, Tomic ST, Haberman JM (2012) Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of the groove. J Exp Psychol Gen 141:54–75. doi:10.1037/a0024208 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones MR (2009) Musical time. In: Hallam S, Cross I, Thaut M (eds) The Oxford handbook of music psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 81–92Google Scholar
  15. Keitz M, Martin-Soelch C, Leenders K (2003) Reward processing in the brain: a prerequisite for movement preparation? Neural Plas 10:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Konvalinka I, Vuust P, Roepstorff A, Frith CD (2010) Follow you, follow me: continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Q J Exp Psychol 63:2220–2230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ladinig O, Honing H, Haden G, Winkler I (2009) Probing attentive and preattentive emergent meter in adult listeners without extensive musical training. Music Percept 26:377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Large EW, Herrera JA, Velasco MJ (2015) Neural networks for beat perception in musical rhythm. Front Syst Neurosci 9:159CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Leman M (2007) Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Leman M, Naveda L (2010) Basic gestures as spatiotemporal reference frames for repetitive dance/music patterns in Samba and Charleston. Music Percept 28:71–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lerdahl F, Jackendoff R (1983) A generative theory of tonal music. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. London J (2012) Hearing in time. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Longuet-Higgins HC, Lee C (1984) The rhythmic interpretation of monophonic music. Music Percept 1:424–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luck G, Saarikallio S, Burger B, Thompson MR, Toiviainen P (2010) Effects of the Big Five and musical genre on music-induced movement. J Res Pers 44:714–720. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Madison G (2006) Experiencing groove induced by music: consistency and phenomenology. Music Percept 24:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Madison G, Gouyon F, Ullén F, Hörnström K (2011) Modeling the tendency for music to induce movement in humans: first correlations with low-level audio descriptors across music genres. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 37:1578–1594. doi:10.1037/a0024323 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Margulis EH, Beatty AP (2008) Musical style, psychoaesthetics, and prospects for entropy as an analytical tool. Comput Music J 32:64–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miura A, Kudo K, Ohtsuki T, Kanehisa H, Nakazawa K (2013) Relationship between muscle cocontraction and proficiency in whole-body sensorimotor synchronization: a comparison study of street dancers and nondancers. Mot Control 17:18–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Palmer C, Krumhansl CL (1990) Mental representation for musical meter. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16:728–741CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Phillips-Silver J, Aktipis AC, Bryant G (2010) The ecology of entrainment: foundations of coordinated rhythmic movement. Music Percept 28:3–14CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Repp BH, Su Y-H (2013) Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychon Bull Rev 20:403–452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Saarikallio S, Luck G, Burger B, Thompson M, Toiviainen P (2013) Dance moves reflect current affective state illustrative of approach–avoidance motivation. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts 7:296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sioros G, Miron M, Davies M, Gouyon F, Madison G (2014) Syncopation creates the sensation of groove in synthesized music examples. Front Psychol 5:1036CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Skewes JC, Skewes L, Michael J, Konvalinka I (2015) Synchronised and complementary coordination mechanisms in an asymmetric joint aiming task. Exp Brain Res 233:551–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Snyder JS, Krumhansl CL (2001) Tapping to ragtime: cues to pulse finding. Music Percept 18:455–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Song C, Simpson AJ, Harte CA, Pearce MT, Sandler MB (2013) Syncopation and the score. PLoS ONE 8:e74692CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Stupacher J, Hove MJ, Novembre G, Schütz-Bosbach S, Keller PE (2013) Musical groove modulates motor cortex excitability: a TMS investigation. Brain Cogn 82:127–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Temperley D (2010) Modeling common-practice rhythm. Music Percept 27:355–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Todd NPMA, Cousins R, Lee CS (2007) The contribution of anthropometric factors to individual differences in the perception of rhythm. Empir Musicol Rev 2:13Google Scholar
  40. Tognoli E, Lagarde J, DeGuzman GC, Kelso JS (2007) The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:8190–8195CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Toiviainen P, Luck G, Thompson MR (2010) Embodied meter: hierarchical eigenmodes in music-induced movement. Music Percept 28:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trost W, Vuilleumier P (2013) Rhythmic entrainment as a mechanism for emotion induction by music: a neurophysiological perspective. In: Cochrane T, Fantini B, Scherer KR (eds) The emotional power of music: multidisciplinary perspectives on musical arousal, expression, and social control. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Dyck E, Moelants D, Demey M, Coussement P, Deweppe A, Leman M (2010) The impact of the basis drum on body movement in spontaneous dance. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on music perception and cognition, Seattle, Washington, USA, 23–27.8.2010Google Scholar
  44. Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E (1991) The embodied mind. Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Witek MAG (2016) Filling in: syncopation, pleasure and distributed embodiment in groove. Music Anal. doi:10.1111/musa.12082 Google Scholar
  46. Witek MAG, Clarke EF, Kringelbach ML, Vuust P (2014a) Effects of polyphonic context, instrumentation and metric location on syncopation in music. Music Percept 32:201–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Witek MAG, Clarke EF, Wallentin M, Kringelbach ML, Vuust P (2014b) Syncopation, body-movement and pleasure in groove music. PLoS ONE 9:e94446. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094446 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Witek MA, Clarke EF, Wallentin M, Kringelbach ML, Vuust P (2015) Correction: syncopation, body-movement and pleasure in groove music. PLoS ONE 10Google Scholar
  49. Wundt W (1874) Grundzuge der physiologischen psychologie. Englemann, LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical MedicineAarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/AalborgAarhusDenmark
  2. 2.Dresden Music Cognition LabDresden University of TechnologyDresdenGermany
  3. 3.Faculty of MusicUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  4. 4.Department of Psychology and Behavioural SciencesAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
  5. 5.Section for Cognitive Systems, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer ScienceTechnical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark
  6. 6.Department of PsychiatryWarneford Hospital, University of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations