The brain may be tuned to evaluate aesthetic perception through perceptual chunking when we observe the grace of the dancer. We modelled biomechanical metrics to explain biological determinants of aesthetic perception in dance. Eighteen expert (EXP) and intermediate (INT) dancers performed développé arabesque in three conditions: (1) slow tempo, (2) slow tempo with relevé, and (3) fast tempo. To compare biomechanical metrics of kinematic data, we calculated intra-excursion variability, principal component analysis (PCA), and dimensionless jerk for the gesture limb. Observers, all trained dancers, viewed motion capture stick figures of the trials and ranked each for aesthetic (1) proficiency and (2) movement smoothness. Statistical analyses included group by condition repeated-measures ANOVA for metric data; Mann–Whitney U rank and Friedman’s rank tests for nonparametric rank data; Spearman’s rho correlations to compare aesthetic rankings and metrics; and linear regression to examine which metric best quantified observers’ aesthetic rankings, p < 0.05. The goodness of fit of the proposed models was determined using Akaike information criteria. Aesthetic proficiency and smoothness rankings of the dance movements revealed differences between groups and condition, p < 0.0001. EXP dancers were rated more aesthetically proficient than INT dancers. The slow and fast conditions were judged more aesthetically proficient than slow with relevé (p < 0.0001). Of the metrics, PCA best captured the differences due to group and condition. PCA also provided the most parsimonious model to explain aesthetic proficiency and smoothness rankings. By permitting organization of large data sets into simpler groupings, PCA may mirror the phenomenon of chunking in which the brain combines sensory motor elements into integrated units of behaviour. In this representation, the chunk of information which is remembered, and to which the observer reacts, is the elemental mode shape of the motion rather than physical displacements. This suggests that reduction in redundant information to a simplistic dimensionality is related to the experienced observer’s aesthetic perception.
Akaike Information Criteria Chunking Dimensionless jerk Principal component analysis Variability
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank the participating dancers and other volunteers.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Abernathy B, Zawi K, Jackson RC (2008) Expertise and attunement to kinematic constraints. Perception 37:931–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aglioti SM, Cesari P, Romani M, Urgesi C (2008) Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nat Neurosci 11:1109–1116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Angioi M, Metsios GS, Twitchett E, Koutedakis Y, Wyon M (2009) Association between selected physical fitness parameters and esthetic competence in contemporary dancers. J Dance Med Sci 13:115–123PubMedGoogle Scholar
Autere A (2013) The feeling balletbody. Dorrance Publishing Co Inc, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
Chatfield SJ, Byrnes WC (1990) Correlational analysis of aesthetic competency, skill acquisition and physiologic capabilities of modern dancers. In: 5th Hong Kong international dance conference Hong Kong. The Secretariat of the Hong Kong Academy for the Performing Arts, pp 79–100Google Scholar
Chatterjee A (2003) Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics. Bull Psychol Arts 4:55–60Google Scholar
Gobet F (2005) Chunking models of expertise: implications for education. Appl Cogn Psychol 19:183–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagendoorn I (2005) Dance perception and the brain. In: Grove R, Stevens C, McKenchnie S (eds) Thinking in four dimensions: creativity and cognition in contemporary dance. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, p 211Google Scholar
Hamill J, van Emmerik RE, Heiderscheit BC, Li L (1999) A dynamical systems approach to lower extremity running injuries. Clin Biomech 14:297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamill J, McDermott WJ, Haddad JM (2000) Issues in quantifying variability from a dynamical systems perspective. J Appl Biomech 16:407–418Google Scholar
Hein T, Schmeltzpfenning T, Krauss I, Maiwald C, Horstmann T, Grau S (2012) Using the variability of continuous relative phase as a measure to discriminate between healthy and injured runners. Hum Mov Sci 31:683–694. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2011.07.008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hollands K, Wing A, Daffertshofer A (2004) Principal components analysis of contemporary dance kinematics. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE EMBSS UK & RI postgraduate conference in biomedical engineering & medical physics. University of Southampton, UKGoogle Scholar
Stevens CJ et al (2009) Cognition and the temporal arts: investigating audience response to dance using PDAs that record continuous data during live performance. Int J Hum Comput Stud 67:800–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens C, Winskel H, Howell C, Vidal LM, Latimer C, Milne-Home J (2010a) Perceiving dance: schematic expectations guide experts’ scanning of a contemporary dance film. J Dance Med Sci 14:19–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
Torrents C, Castañer M, Jofre T, Morey G, Reverter F (2013) Kinematic parameters that influence the aesthetic perception of beauty in contemporary dance. Perception 42:447–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Wilson M, Lim B-O, Kim Y-H (2004) Rond de jambe en l’air skilled versus novice ballet dancers. J Dance Med Sci 8:108–115Google Scholar
Wilson C, Simpson SE, van Emmerik RE, Hamill J (2008) Coordination variability and skill development in expert triple jumpers. Sports Biomech 7:2–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Yan JH, Dick MB (2006) Practice effects on motor control in healthy seniors and patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 13:385–410. doi:10.1080/138255890969609CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar