When reaching towards objects, the human central nervous system (CNS) can actively compensate for two different perturbations simultaneously (dual adaptation), though this does not simply occur upon presentation. Dual adaptation is made more difficult when the desired trajectories and targets are identical and hence do not cue the impending perturbation. In cases like these, the CNS requires contextual cues in order to predict the dynamics of the environment. Not all cues are effective at facilitating dual adaptation. In two experiments, we investigated the efficacy of two contextual cues that are intrinsic to the CNS, namely hand as well as body posture in concurrently adapting to two opposing visuomotor rotations. For the hand posture experiment, we also look at the role of extended training. Participants reached manually to visual targets with their unseen hand represented by a cursor that was rotated either 30° clockwise or counterclockwise, determined randomly on each reach. Each rotation was associated with a distinct hand posture (a precision or power grip, respectively) in one experiment and a distinct body rotation (10° leftward or rightward turn of the seat, respectively, while fixating straight) in the second experiment. Critically, the targets (and thus, the required cursor trajectories) were identical in both rotations. We found that how people held the tool or oriented their body while reaching is sufficient for concurrently adapting separate visuomotor mappings such that over time, reach errors significantly decrease. Extended practice did not lead to further benefits though. These findings suggest that when the required cursor movements are identical for different visuomotor mappings, dual adaptation is still possible given sufficient intrinsic contextual cues.
Motor learning Dual adaptation Visuomotor rotation Reaching Internal model Cerebellum
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
Thanks to Priyanka Sharma for her assistance with data collection. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Denise Y. P. Henriques) and the German Research Foundation (DFG) under Grant No. HA 6861/2-1 (Bernard Marius ‘t Hart).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Baldeo R, Henriques D (2013) Dual adaptation to opposing visuomotor rotations with similar hand movement trajectories. Exp Brain Res 227(2):231–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Balitsky Thompson AK, Henriques DY (2010) Visuomotor adaptation and intermanual transfer under different viewing conditions. Exp Brain Res 202(3):543–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Baraduc P, Wolpert DM (2002) Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture. J Neurophysiol 88(2):973–981PubMedGoogle Scholar
Donchin O, Francis JT, Shadmehr R (2003) Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: theory and experiments in human motor control. J Neurosci 23(27):9032–9045 PubMedGoogle Scholar
Dumontheil I, Panagiotaki P, Berthoz A (2006) Dual adaptation to sensory conflicts during whole-body rotations. Brain Res 1072(1):119–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Gupta R, Ashe J (2007) Lack of adaptation to random conflicting force fields of variable magnitude. J Neurophysiol 97(1):738–745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Haruno M, Wolpert DM, Kawato M (2001) Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput 13(10):2201–2220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hegele M, Heuer H (2010) Implicit and explicit components of dual adaptation to visuomotor rotations. Conscious Cogn 19(4):906–917CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hinder MR, Woolley DG, Tresilian JR, Riek S, Carson RG (2008) The efficacy of colour cues in facilitating adaptation to opposing visuomotor rotations. Exp Brain Res 191(2):143–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi M, Ghez C (2000) Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20(23):8916–8924PubMedGoogle Scholar
Krouchev NI, Kalaska JF (2003) Context-dependent anticipation of different task dynamics: rapid recall of appropriate motor skills using visual cues. J Neurophysiol 89(2):1165–1175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Osu R, Hirai S, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (2004) Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand. Nat Neurosci 7(2):111–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3(Suppl):1212–1217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Woolley DG, Tresilian JR, Carson RG, Riek S (2007) Dual adaptation to two opposing visuomotor rotations when each is associated with different regions of workspace. Exp Brain Res 179(2):155–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Woolley DG, de Rugy A, Carson RG, Riek S (2011) Visual target separation determines the extent of generalisation between opposing visuomotor rotations. Exp Brain Res 212(2):213–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar