Trigeminal nerve stimulation modulates brainstem more than cortical excitability in healthy humans
Multiple sites in the central nervous system (CNS) have been hypothesized to explain the beneficial effects of transcutaneous trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) on several disorders. This work investigated the acute effects of TNS on the excitability of brainstem and intracortical circuits, as well as on sensorimotor integration processes at cortical level in physiological conditions. Brainstem excitability was evaluated in seventeen healthy subjects measuring the R1 and R2 areas of the blink reflex (BR) and its recovery cycle, with cortical excitability and sensorimotor integration assessed by probing short-interval (SICI) and long-interval (LICI) intracortical inhibition, with short-interval (SICF), intracortical facilitation (ICF), short-latency (SAI) and long-latency (LAI) inhibition measuring motor potentials evoked in the first dorsal interosseous muscle by TMS of the contralateral motor cortex. Neurophysiological parameters were assessed, in seventeen healthy subjects, before and after cyclic 20-min TNS delivered bilaterally to the infraorbital nerve. After TNS, the area of the R2 was significantly reduced (p = 0.018). By contrast, R1 area and R2 recovery cycle were unaffected. Similarly, SICI, ICF, LICI, SICF, SAI and LAI appeared unaltered after TNS. These data suggest that, in normal subjects, TNS mainly acts on brainstem polysynaptic circuits mediating the R2 component of the BR and plays a minor role in modifying the activity of higher-level structures involved in the R2 recovery cycle and in modulation of cortical excitability. A further investigation of a chronic TNS-induced effect may disclose a higher potential for TNS in producing measurable after effects on its CNS targets.
KeywordsTrigeminal nerve stimulation Transcranial magnetic stimulation Blink reflex Cortical excitability Brainstem excitability Sensorimotor integration
The authors are grateful to Dr. Paolo Enrico for his critical revision of the manuscript, Mr. Paul Gottlieb for language revision. Drs Beniamina Mercante and Andrea Manca were funded by a doctoral research fellowship (XXVIII cycle) awarded by the Regione Autonoma della Sardegna and MIUR (Italy), respectively. Dr Francesca Ginatempo was supported by Fondazione Banco di Sardegna Sassari (Italy).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Classen J, Steinfelder B, Liepert J, Stefan K, Celnik P, Cohen LG, Hess A, Kunesch E, Chen R, Benecke R, Hallett M (2000) Cutaneomotor integration in humans is somatotopically organized at various levels of the nervous system and is task dependent. Exp Brain Res 130(1):48–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeGiorgio CM, Soss J, Cook IA, Markovic D, Gornbein J, Murray D, Oviedo S, Gordon S, Corralle-Leyva G, Kealey CP, Heck CN (2013) Randomized controlled trial of trigeminal nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy. Neurology 80(9):786–791. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318285c11a PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Groves DA, Brown VJ (2005) Vagal nerve stimulation: a review of its applications and potential mechanisms that mediate its clinical effects. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29(3):493–500. ReviewGoogle Scholar
- Kiernan JA (2009) Barr’s the human nervous system: an anatomical viewpoint, 9th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Nisticò R, Salsone M, Vescio B, Morelli M, Trotta M, Barbagallo G, Arabia G, Ongerboer de Visser BW, Cruccu G (1993) Neurophysiologic examination of the trigeminal, facial, hypoglossal, and spinal accessory nerves in cranial neuropathies and brain stem disorders. In: Brown WF, Bolton CF (eds) Clinical electromyography. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 61–92Google Scholar
- Nisticò R, Salsone M, Vescio B, Morelli M, Trotta M, Barbagallo G, Arabia G, Quattrone A (2014) Blink reflex recovery cycle distinguishes essential tremor with resting tremor from de novo Parkinson's disease: an exploratory study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 20(2), pp. 153–6, doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.10.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pilurzi G, Hasan A, Saifee TA, Tolu E, Rothwell JC, Deriu F (2013) Intracortical circuits, sensorimotor integration and plasticity in human motor cortical projections to muscles of the lower face. J Physiol 591(Pt7):1889–1906. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.245746 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, Di Lazzaro V, Ferreri F, Fitzgerald PB, George MS, Hallett M, Lefaucheur JP, Langguth B, Matsumoto H, Miniussi C, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Rossi S, Rothwell JC, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Walsh V, Ziemann U (2015) Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol 126(6):1071–1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rothwell JC, Hallett M, Berardelli A, Eisen A, Rossini P, Paulus W (1999) Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The international federation of clinical neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 52(Supp 2):97–103Google Scholar
- Samuels ER, Szabadi E (2008) Functional neuroanatomy of the noradrenergic locus coeruleus: its roles in the regulation of arousal and autonomic function part II: physiological and pharmacological manipulations and pathological alterations of locus coeruleus activity in humans. Curr Neuropharmacol 6(3):254–285. doi: 10.2174/157015908785777193 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tokimura H, Di Lazzaro V, Tokimura Y, Oliviero A, Profice P, Insola A, Mazzone P, Tonali P, Rothwell JC (2000) Short latency inhibition of human hand motor cortex by somatosensory input from the hand. J Physiol 523(Pt 2):503–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-0050 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zeuner KE, Knutzen A, Al-Ali A, Hallett M, Deuschl G, Bergmann TO, Siebner HR (2010) Associative stimulation of the supraorbital nerve fails to induce timing-specific plasticity in the human blink reflex. PLoS one 5(10):e13602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013602 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar