Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on multiscale complexity of dual-task postural control in older adults
- 504 Downloads
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the prefrontal cortex reduces the size and speed of standing postural sway in younger adults, particularly when performing a cognitive dual task. Here, we hypothesized that tDCS would alter the complex dynamics of postural sway as quantified by multiscale entropy (MSE). Twenty healthy older adults completed two study visits. Center-of-pressure (COP) fluctuations were recorded during single-task (i.e., quiet standing) and dual-task (i.e., standing while performing serial subtractions) conditions, both before and after a 20-min session of real or sham tDCS. MSE was used to estimate COP complexity within each condition. The percentage change in complexity from single- to dual-task conditions (i.e., dual-task cost) was also calculated. Before tDCS, COP complexity was lower (p = 0.04) in the dual-task condition as compared to the single-task condition. Neither real nor sham tDCS altered complexity in the single-task condition. As compared to sham tDCS, real tDCS increased complexity in the dual-task condition (p = 0.02) and induced a trend toward improved serial subtraction performance (p = 0.09). Moreover, those subjects with lower dual-task COP complexity at baseline exhibited greater percentage increases in complexity following real tDCS (R = −0.39, p = 0.05). Real tDCS also reduced the dual-task cost to complexity (p = 0.02), while sham stimulation had no effect. A single session of tDCS targeting the prefrontal cortex increased standing postural sway complexity with concurrent non-postural cognitive task. This form of noninvasive brain stimulation may be a safe strategy to acutely improve postural control by enhancing the system’s capacity to adapt to stressors.
KeywordsPostural control Dual task tDCS Elderly Multiscale entropy
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 11372013) and the National Institute on Aging (1K01AG044543-01A1). We sincerely appreciate Dapeng Bao and the Beijing Sport University for providing the equipment needed to measure body postural sway.
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare that there is no further conflict of interest in this study.
All procedures performed in studies involving human subjects were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Blaszczyk JW, Klonowski W (2001) Postural stability and fractal dynamics. Acta Neurobiol Exp 61:105–112Google Scholar
- Lipsitz LA (2009) Physiological complexity, aging, and the path to frailty. Sci Aging Knowledge Environ 16:pe16Google Scholar
- Teasdale N, Lajoie Y, Bard C et al (1993) Cognitive processes involved for maintaining postural stability while standing and walking. In: Stelmach GE, Homberg V (eds) Sensorimotor Impairment in the Elderly. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 157–168Google Scholar
- Wayne PM, Gow BJ, Costa MD et al (2014) Complexity-based measures inform effect of Tai Chi training on standing postural control: cross-sectional and randomized trial studies PloS One 9(12):e114731Google Scholar