Degraded expression of learned feedforward control in movements released by startle
Recent work has shown that preplanned motor programs can be rapidly released via fast conducting pathways using a startling acoustic stimulus. Our question was whether the startle-elicited response might also release a recently learned internal model, which draws on experience to predict and compensate for expected perturbations in a feedforward manner. Our initial investigation using adaptation to robotically produced forces showed some evidence of this, but the results were potentially confounded by co-contraction caused by startle. In this study, we eliminated this confound by asking subjects to make reaching movements in the presence of a visual distortion. Results show that a startle stimulus (1) decreased performance of the recently learned task and (2) reduced after-effect magnitude. Since the recall of learned control was reduced, but not eliminated during startle trials, we suggest that multiple neural centers (cortical and subcortical) are involved in such learning and adaptation. These findings have implications for motor training in areas such as piloting, teleoperation, sports, and rehabilitation.
KeywordsAdaptation Learning Movement Upper extremity Healthy
We thank Mark Shapiro for use of his Delsys EMG system and Vess Djeov for his technical assistance.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Burgess JK, Haner R, and Patton JL (2007) Generalization of motor adaptation skills from bimanual-grasp to individual limbs. IEEE Trans Neural Eng Rehabil 15Google Scholar
- Carlsen AN, Almeida QJ, Franks IM (2012) Startle decreases reaction time for active inhibition. Exp Brain Res 123:21–33Google Scholar
- Cunningham HA (1989) Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps. J Exp Psychol 15:493–506Google Scholar
- Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (2000) Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20:8516–8924Google Scholar
- Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Mentis M, Barnes A, Veytsman M, Eidelberg D, Ghez C (2004) Differential cortical and subcortical activations in learning rotations and gains for reaching: a PET study. J Neurophysiol 91(924):933Google Scholar
- Patton J, Wie Y, Scharver C, Kenyon R, Scheidt R (2006) Motivating rehabilitation by distorting reality. BioRob 2006 The first IEEE/RAR-EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy, February 20–22Google Scholar
- Wei Y, Bajaj P, Scheidt R, Patton J (2005) Visual error augmentation for enhancing motor learning and rehabilitative relearning. IEEE international conference on rehabilation robotics, Chicago, IL, USAGoogle Scholar
- Wright ZA, Rogers MW, MacKinnon CD, Patton JL (2009) Startle stimuli reduce the internal model control in discrete movements. IEEE engineering in medicine and biology conference, Minneapolis, MN, USAGoogle Scholar
- Wright ZA, Ravichaandran V, Patton JL (2011) Startle reduces recall of a recently learned internal model. IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar