Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 233, Issue 6, pp 1733–1744 | Cite as

Factors underlying age-related changes in discrete aiming

  • Florian Van Halewyck
  • Ann Lavrysen
  • Oron Levin
  • Matthieu P. Boisgontier
  • Digby Elliott
  • Werner F. Helsen
Research Article


Age has a clear impact on one’s ability to make accurate goal-directed aiming movements. Older adults seem to plan slower and shorter-ranged initial pulses towards the target, and rely more on sensory feedback to ensure endpoint accuracy. Despite the fact that these age-related changes in manual aiming have been observed consistently, the underlying mechanism remains speculative. In an attempt to isolate four commonly suggested underlying factors, young and older adults were instructed to make discrete aiming movements under varying speed and accuracy constraints. Results showed that older adults were physically able to produce fast primary submovements and that they demonstrated similar movement-programming capacities as young adults. On the other hand, considerable evidence was found supporting a decreased visual feedback-processing efficiency and the implementation of a play-it-safe strategy in older age. In conclusion, a combination of the latter two factors seems to underlie the age-related changes in manual aiming behaviour.


Manual aiming Motor control Ageing Kinematics 



Werner F. Helsen and Florian Van Halewyck would like to acknowledge the KU Leuven Research Council for financially supporting this research project. Matthieu P. Boisgontier is supported by a research Grant (1504015N) and a post-doctoral fellowship of the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO). The authors also wish to thank Ig. Marc Beirinckx and Ig. Paul Meugens for providing invaluable guidance in designing the research equipment.


  1. Boisgontier MP, Olivier I, Chenu O, Nougier V (2012) Presbypropria: the effects of physiological ageing on proprioceptive control. Age 34:1179–1194. doi: 10.1007/s11357-011-9300-y CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boisgontier MP, Nougier V (2013) Ageing of internal models: from a continuous to an intermittent proprioceptive control of movement. Age 35:1339–1355. doi: 10.1007/s11357-012-9436-4 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boisgontier MP, Wittenberg GF, Fujiyama H, Levin O, Swinnen SP (2014) Complexity of central processing in simple and choice multilimb reaction-time tasks. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090457 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boisseau E, Scherzer P, Cohen H (2002) Eye-hand coordination in aging and in Parkinson’s disease. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 9:266–275. doi: 10.1076/Anec. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaput S, Proteau L (1996) Aging and motor control. J Gerontol B Psychol 51:346–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christou EA, Carlton LG (2001) Old adults exhibit greater motor output variability than young adults only during rapid discrete isometric contractions. J Gerontol A Biol 56:524–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coats RO, Wann JP (2011) The reliance on visual feedback control by older adults is highlighted in tasks requiring precise endpoint placement and precision grip. Exp Brain Res 214:139–150. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2813-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Elliott D, Hansen S, Grierson LE, Lyons J, Bennett SJ, Hayes SJ (2010) Goal-directed aiming: two components but multiple processes. Psychol Bull 136:1023–1044. doi: 10.1037/a0020958 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliott D, Hansen S, Mendoza J, Tremblay L (2004) Learning to optimize speed, accuracy, and energy expenditure: a framework for understanding speed-accuracy relations in goal-directed aiming. J Motor Behav 36:339–351. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.36.3.339-351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engelbrecht SE, Berthier NE, O’Sullivan LP (2003) The undershoot bias: learning to act optimally under uncertainty. Psychol Sci 14:257–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Falkenstein M, Yordanova J, Kolev V (2006) Effects of aging on slowing of motor-response generation. Int J Psychophysiol 59:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.08.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Galganski ME, Fuglevand AJ, Enoka RM (1993) Reduced control of motor output in a human hand muscle of elderly subjects during submaximal contractions. J Neurophysiol 69:2108–2115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hansen S, Glazebrook CM, Anson JG, Weeks DJ, Elliott D (2006) The influence of advance information about target location and visual feedback on movement planning and execution. Can J Exp Psychol 60:200–208. doi: 10.1037/cjep2006019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Heath M (2005) Role of limb and target vision in the online control of memory-guided reaches. Mot Control 9:281–311Google Scholar
  16. Helsen WF, Elliott D, Starkes JL, Ricker KL (1998) Temporal and spatial coupling of point of gaze and hand movements in aiming. J Mot Behav 30:249–259. doi: 10.1080/00222899809601340 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hinder MR, Fujiyama H, Summers JJ (2012) Premotor-motor interhemispheric inhibition is released during movement initiation in older but not young adults. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052573 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ketcham CJ, Seidler RD, Van Gemmert AW, Stelmach GE (2002) Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. J Gerontol B Psychol 57:54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kimura J (2001) Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle: principles and practice. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Khan MA et al (2006) Inferring online and offline processing of visual feedback in target-directed movements from kinematic data. Neurosci Biobehav R 30:1106–1121. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khan MA, Franks IM, Goodman D (1998) The effect of practice on the control of rapid aiming movements: evidence for an independency between programming and feedback processing. Q J Exp Psychol 51:425–444. doi: 10.1080/713755756 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K (1985) Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 39:386–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Messier J, Kalaska JF (1999) Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 25:139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Oxford Grice K, Vogel KA, Le V, Mitchell A, Muniz S, Vollmer MA (2003) Adult norms for a commercially available Nine Hole Peg Test for finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 57:570–573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pohl PS, Winstein CJ (1998) Age-related effects on temporal strategies to speed motor performance. J Aging Phys Act 6:45–61Google Scholar
  27. Poston B, Van Gemmert AW, Barduson B, Stelmach GE (2009) Movement structure in young and elderly adults during goal-directed movements of the left and right arm. Brain Cogn 69:30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.05.002 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pratt J, Chasteen AL, Abrams RA (1994) Rapid aimed limb movements: age differences and practice effects in component submovements. Psychol Aging 9:325–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rey-Robert B, Temprado JJ, Lemaire P, Berton E (2012) Combining movement kinematics, efficiency functions, and Brinley plots to study age-related slowing of sensorimotor processes: insights from Fitts’ task. Gerontology 58:171–180. doi: 10.1159/000329347 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Saunders JA, Knill DC (2003) Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 152:341–352. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1525-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmidt RA, Zelaznik H, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn JT (1979) Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev 47:415–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Seidler-Dobrin RD, Stelmach GE (1998) Persistence in visual feedback control by the elderly. Exp Brain Res 119:467–474. doi: 10.1007/S002210050362 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Temprado JJ, Sleimen-Malkoun R, Lemaire P, Rey-Robert B, Retornaz F, Berton E (2013) Aging of sensorimotor processes: a systematic study in Fitts’ task. Exp Brain Res 228:105–116. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3542-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Halewyck F, Lavrysen A, Levin O, Boisgontier MP, Elliott D, Helsen WF (2014a) Both age and physical activity level impact on eye-hand coordination. Hum Mov Sci 36:80–96. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.05.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Halewyck F, Lavrysen A, Levin O, Elliott D, Helsen WF (2014b) The impact of age and physical activity level on manual aiming performance. J Aging Phys Act. doi: 10.1123/japa.2013-0104 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Walker N, Philbin DA, Fisk AD (1997) Age-related differences in movement control: adjusting submovement structure to optimize performance. J Gerontol B Psychol 52:40–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Welsh TN, Higgins L, Elliott D (2007) Are there age-related differences in learning to optimize speed, accuracy, and energy expenditure? Hum Mov Sci 26:892–912. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.04.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Woodworth RS (1899) The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychol Rev 3:1–119Google Scholar
  39. Yan JH, Thomas JR, Stelmach GE (1998) Aging and rapid aiming arm movement control. Exp Brain Res 24:155–168Google Scholar
  40. Yordanova J, Kolev V, Hohnsbein J, Falkenstein M (2004) Sensorimotor slowing with ageing is mediated by a functional dysregulation of motor-generation processes: evidence from high-resolution event-related potentials. Brain 127:351–362. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh042 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian Van Halewyck
    • 1
  • Ann Lavrysen
    • 1
  • Oron Levin
    • 1
  • Matthieu P. Boisgontier
    • 1
  • Digby Elliott
    • 2
  • Werner F. Helsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of KinesiologyKU LeuvenLouvainBelgium
  2. 2.Research Institute for Sport and Exercise SciencesLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations