Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 233, Issue 2, pp 415–424 | Cite as

Both right- and left-handers show a bias to attend others’ right arm

  • Daniele Marzoli
  • Chiara Lucafò
  • Alessandra Pagliara
  • Romina Cappuccio
  • Alfredo Brancucci
  • Luca Tommasi
Research Article

Abstract

The common-coding hypothesis suggests that the more similar an observed action is to the way the observer would perform it, the stronger is the ensuing activation of motor representations. Therefore, producing actions could prime perception so that observers would be particularly responsive to (i.e. biased to perceive) actions that are related to, and share features with, their own actions. If this similarity principle also applies to handedness, right- and left-handers should be more likely to perceive actions as performed with their dominant rather than non-dominant hand. In two experiments, participants were required to indicate the perceived orientation (front or back view) of pictures of ambiguous human silhouettes performing one-handed manual actions. Experiment 1, in which 300 right-handers and 60 left-handers reported the orientation of a single silhouette seen for as much as they wished, showed that participants perceived the figures more frequently in an orientation congruent with a movement performed with the right rather than the left hand. Experiment 2, in which 12 right-handers and 12 left-handers reported the orientation of 52 silhouettes seen for 300 ms, showed similar results when multiple responses per participant were collected rather than only one. Contrary to our expectations, no difference was observed between right- and left-handers, which might suggest an attentional bias towards the right arm of human bodies in both groups. Moreover, participants were more likely to perceive the figure as front-facing than as back-facing, possibly due to the greater adaptive relevance of approaching compared to receding individuals.

Keywords

Common coding Handedness Human body Ambiguous figures Facing bias Perceptual frequency effect 

Supplementary material

221_2014_4124_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.5 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1536 kb)

References

  1. Abernethy B, Gill DP, Parks SL, Packer ST (2000) Expertise and the perception of kinematic and situational probability information. Perception 30:233–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abernethy B, Zawi K, Jackson RC (2008) Expertise and attunement to kinematic constraints. Perception 37:931–948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aglioti SM, Cesari P, Romani M, Urgesi C (2008) Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nat Neurosci 11:1109–1116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berends HI, Wolkorte R, Ijzerman MJ, van Putten MJAM (2013) Differential cortical activation during observation and observation-and-imagination. Exp Brain Res 229:337–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bisiacchi PS, Ripoll H, Stein J, Simonet P, Azemar G (1985) Left-handedness in fencers: an attentional advantage? Percept Mot Skills 61:507–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blakemore S-J, Decety J (2001) From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:561–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Seitz RJ, Zilles K, Rizzolatti G (2001) Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 13:400–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Calvo-Merino B, Glaser DE, Grèzes J, Passingham RE, Haggard P (2005) Action observation and acquired motor skills. Cereb Cortex 15:1243–1249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casile A, Giese MA (2006) Non-visual motor learning influences the recognition of biological motion. Curr Biol 16:69–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conson M, Mazzarella E, Trojano L (2011) Self-touch affects motor imagery: a study on posture interference effect. Exp Brain Res 215:115–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cross ES, Hamilton AF, Grafton ST (2006) Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers. NeuroImage 31:1257–1267PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dassonville P, Zhu X-H, Ugurbil K, Kim S-G, Ashe J (1997) Functional activation in motor cortex reflects the direction and the degree of handedness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:14015–14018PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doi H, Shinohara K (2012) Bodily movement of approach is detected faster than that of receding. Psychon Bull Rev 19:858–863PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faurie C, Raymond M (2005) Handedness, homicide and negative frequency-dependent selection. Proc Biol Sci 272:25–28PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallese V (2003) The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: the quest for a common mechanism. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:517–528PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardner M, Potts R (2010) Hand dominance influences the processing of observed bodies. Brain Cogn 73:35–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gehlbach H, Barge S (2012) Anchoring and adjusting in questionnaire responses. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 34:417–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gentilucci M, Daprati E, Gangitano M (1998) Right-handers and left-handers have different representations of their own hand. Cogn Brain Res 6:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grafton ST, Arbib MA, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G (1996) Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. 2. Observation compared with imagination. Exp Brain Res 112:103–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grèzes J, Decety J (2001) Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 12:1–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grèzes J, Armony JL, Rowe J, Passingham RE (2003) Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 18:928–937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grèzes J, Frith CD, Passingham RE (2004) Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 21:744–750PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gursoy R (2009) Effects of left- or right-hand preference on the success of boxers in Turkey. Br J Sports Med 43:142–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hagemann N (2009) The advantage of being left-handed in interactive sports. Atten Percept Psychophys 71:1641–1648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heenan A, Troje NF (2014) Both physical exercise and progressive muscle relaxation reduce the facing-the-viewer bias in biological motion perception. PLoS ONE 9:e99902PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hohmann T, Troje NF, Olmos A, Munzert J (2011) The influence of motor expertise and motor experience on action and actor recognition. J Cogn Psychol 23:403–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holtzen DW (2000) Handedness and professional tennis. Int J Neurosci 105:101–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action. Behav Brain Sci 24:849–937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ionta S, Blanke O (2009) Differential influence of hands posture on mental rotation of hands and feet in right and left handers. Exp Brain Res 195:207–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ionta S, Fourkas A, Fiorio M, Aglioti SM (2007) The influence of hands posture on mental rotation of hands and feet. Exp Brain Res 183:1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jacobs A, Pinto J, Shiffrar M (2004) Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:822–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jeannerod M (2001) Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage 14:S103–S109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johansson G (1973) Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys 14:201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knoblich G, Flach R (2001) Predicting the effects of actions: interactions of perception and action. Psychol Sci 12:467–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knoblich G, Flach R (2003) Action identity: evidence from self-recognition, prediction, and coordination. Conscious Cogn 12:620–632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Knoblich G, Sebanz N (2006) The social nature of perception and action. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15:99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Loffing F, Schorer J, Hagemann N, Baker J (2012) On the advantage of being left-handed in volleyball: further evidence of the specificity of skilled visual perception. Atten Percept Psychophys 74:446–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Macuga KL, Frey SH (2012) Neural representations involved in observed, imagined, and imitated actions are dissociable and hierarchically organized. NeuroImage 59:2798–2807PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marzoli D, Mitaritonna A, Moretto F, Carluccio P, Tommasi L (2011a) The handedness of imagined bodies in action and the role of perspective-taking. Brain Cogn 75:51–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marzoli D, Palumbo R, Di Domenico A, Penolazzi B, Garganese P, Tommasi L (2011b) The relation between self-reported empathy and motor identification with imagined agents. PLoS ONE 6:e14595PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marzoli D, Menditto S, Lucafò C, Tommasi L (2013) Imagining others’ handedness: visual and motor processes in the attribution of the dominant hand to an imagined agent. Exp Brain Res 22:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marzoli D, Prete G, Tommasi L (2014) Perceptual asymmetries and handedness: a neglected link? Front Psychol 5:163PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McMorris T, Colenso S (1996) Anticipation of professional soccer goalkeepers when facing right- and left-footed penalty kicks. Percept Mot Skills 82:931–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mechelli A, Price CJ, Friston KJ, Ishai A (2004) Where bottom-up meets top-down: neuronal interactions during perception and imagery. Cereb Cortex 14:1256–1265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Munzert J, Zentgraf K, Stark R, Vaitl D (2008) Neural activation in cognitive motor processes: comparing motor imagery and observation of gymnastic movements. Exp Brain Res 188:437–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nì Choisdealbha Á, Brady N, Maguinness C (2011) Differing roles for the dominant and non-dominant hands in the hand laterality task. Exp Brain Res 211:73–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parsons LM (1994) Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behaviour reflected in mentally simulated action. J Exp Psychol Hum 20:709–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raymond M, Pontier D, Dufour AB, Moller AP (1996) Frequency-dependent maintenance of left handedness in humans. Proc Biol Sci 263:1627–1633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reithler J, van Mier HI, Peters JC, Goebel R (2007) Nonvisual motor learning influences abstract action observation. Curr Biol 17:1201–1207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V (2001) Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:661–670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salmaso D, Longoni AM (1985) Problems in the assessment of hand preference. Cortex 21:533–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schorer J, Loffing F, Hagemann N, Baker J (2012) Human handedness in interactive situations: negative perceptual frequency effects can be reversed! J Sports Sci 30:507–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schouten B, Troje NF, Brooks A, van der Zwan R, Verfaillie K (2010) The facing bias in biological motion perception: effects of stimulus gender and observer sex. Atten Percept Psychophys 72:1256–1260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schütz-Bosbach S, Prinz W (2007) Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception. Trends Cogn Sci 11:349–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sebanz N, Shiffrar M (2009) Detecting deception in a bluffing body: the role of expertise. Psychon B Rev 16:170–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Solodkin A, Hlustik P, Noll DC, Small SL (2001) Lateralization of motor circuits and handedness during finger movements. Eur J Neurol 8:425–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stelzl I (2000) What sample sizes are needed to get correct significance levels for log-linear models? A Monte Carlo study using the SPSS procedure “Hiloglinear”. Methods Psychol Res Online 5:95–116Google Scholar
  58. Stokes M, Thompson R, Cusack R, Duncan J (2009) Top-down activation of shape-specific population codes in visual cortex during mental imagery. J Neurosci 29:1565–1572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Szameitat AJ, Shen S, Conforto A, Sterr A (2012) Cortical activation during executed, imagined, observed, and passive wrist movements in healthy volunteers and stroke patients. NeuroImage 62:266–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Takeda K, Shimoda N, Sato Y, Ogano M, Kato H (2010) Reaction time differences between left- and right-handers during mental rotation of hand pictures. Laterality 15:415–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Thornton IM, Vuong QC, Bülthoff HH (2003) A chimeric point-light walker. Perception 32:377–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Van de Cruys S, Schouten B, Wagemans J (2013) An anxiety-induced bias in the perception of a bistable point-light walker. Acta Psychol 144:548–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vanrie J, Dekeyser M, Verfaillie K (2004) Bistability and biasing effects in the perception of an ambiguous point-light walker. Perception 33:547–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Willems RM, Hagoort P (2009) Hand preference influences neural correlates of action observation. Brain Res 1269:90–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Willems RM, Toni I, Hagoort P, Casasanto D (2009) Body-specific motor imagery of hand actions: neural evidence from right-and left-handers. Front Hum Neurosci 3:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Willems RM, Hagoort P, Casasanto D (2010) Body-specific representations of action verbs: neural evidence from right- and left-handers. Psychol Sci 21:67–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Williamson KE, Jakobson LS, Troje NF (2008) A right-facing bias in the processing of biological motion? J Vis 8:913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ziyagil MA, Gursoy R, Dane Ş, Yuksel R (2010) Left-handed wrestlers are more successful. Percept Mot Skills 111:65–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniele Marzoli
    • 1
  • Chiara Lucafò
    • 2
  • Alessandra Pagliara
    • 1
  • Romina Cappuccio
    • 1
  • Alfredo Brancucci
    • 1
  • Luca Tommasi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychological Sciences, Humanities and TerritoryUniversity of ChietiChietiItaly
  2. 2.Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical SciencesUniversity of ChietiChietiItaly

Personalised recommendations