Effect of attentional interference on balance recovery in older adults
- 534 Downloads
Since most working memory (WM) tasks used in dual-task (DT) postural paradigms include both storage and processing of information, it is difficult to determine the extent to which each of these contributes to interference with balance control. In the current study, a change-detection task (changes in colored squares between two presentation events) that estimates visual working memory capacity (VWMC) was paired with tasks of increasing postural demand (stance, perturbation) in young adults (YAs) and older adults (OAs) and performance compared between the two postural conditions and across the two populations. The change-detection task was selected as it requires storage of information without updating or manipulation; 34 YAs, 34 OAs, and five frail OAs were recruited. A significant reduction in VWMC occurred with increasing postural demand during the perturbation condition for both YAs (p < 0.01) and OAs (p < 0.001). VWMC was also significantly lower for OAs than YAs in the control condition (1.8 ± 0.7 vs. 2.8 ± 0.6) (p < 0.001). OAs showed a significant increase in the number of trials in which steps or rise to toes occurred during recovery between single-task (ST) and DT (p < 0.05; p < 0.05). OAs also showed a significant increase in normalized tibialis anterior amplitude (p < 0.001) following perturbations. YAs showed an increase in normalized area under the center of pressure trajectory and in AP forces (nAcopx1: p < 0.001; nFap1: p < 0.05) during the DT condition.
KeywordsPostural control Dual-task postural paradigm Automatic postural response Visual working memory Aging Fall prevention Attention
This research was supported by the National Institute of Health, Grant #AG021598 (M Woollacott, PI).
- Bugalho P, Veana-Baptista M (2013) Predictors of cognitive decline in the early stages of Parkinson’s disease: a brief cognitive assessment longitudinal study. Parkinson’s Disease, vol 2013, Article ID 912037, 8 p. doi: 10.1155/2013/912037
- Field A (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Hasher L, Zacks RT (1988) Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and meditation. Academic Press, New York, pp 193–225Google Scholar
- Horak FB, Diener HC, Nashner LM (1989) Influence of central set on human postural responses. J Neurophy 62(4):841–853Google Scholar
- Kahneman D (1973) Attention and effort. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
- Little CE (2012) The role of attention in fall prevention—evaluation of dual task interference with postural and visual working memory tasks in young and older adults; does capacity limitation influence postural responses? PhD Thesis, University of OregonGoogle Scholar
- Norman GR, Streiner DL (2000) Biostatistics: the bare essentials, 2nd edn. B.C. Decker Inc., LondonGoogle Scholar
- Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH (2012) Motor control: translating research into clinical practice, 4th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, p 166Google Scholar
- Sperling G (1960) The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychol Monogr 74 (Whole No. 498)Google Scholar
- Spirduso WW, Francis KL, MacRae PG (2005) Physical dimensions of aging, 2nd edn. Human Kinetics, United StatesGoogle Scholar
- Wickens CD (1983) Processing resources in attention, dual task performance, and workload assessment. In: Parasuraman R, Davies R (eds) Varieties of attention. Academic Press, New York, pp 63–102Google Scholar