Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 232, Issue 6, pp 1843–1853 | Cite as

Perception of complex motion in humans and pigeons (Columba livia)

  • Jean-François NankooEmail author
  • Christopher R. Madan
  • Marcia L. Spetch
  • Douglas R. Wylie
Research Article

Abstract

In the primate visual system, local motion signals are pooled to create a global motion percept. Like primates, many birds are highly dependent on vision for their survival, yet relatively little is known about motion perception in birds. We used random-dot stimuli to investigate pigeons’ ability to detect complex motion (radial, rotation, and spiral) compared to humans. Our human participants had a significantly lower threshold for rotational and radial motion when compared to spiral motion. The data from the pigeons, however, showed that the pigeons were most sensitive to rotational motion and least sensitive to radial motion, while sensitivity for spiral motion was intermediate. We followed up the pigeon results with an investigation of the effect of display aperture shape for rotational motion and velocity gradient for radial motion. We found no effect of shape of the aperture on thresholds, but did observe that radial motion containing accelerating dots improved thresholds. However, this improvement did not reach the thresholds levels observed for rotational motion. In sum, our experiments demonstrate that the pooling mechanism in the pigeon motion system is most efficient for rotation.

Keywords

Visual perception Motion perception Columba livia Coherence threshold Motion integration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank J.P., A.N.S. and M.K.M. for participating in our study. We would also like to thank Isaac Lank, Jeffrey Pisklak, and Jason Long for their help with technical issues and for running the pigeons in the experiments. This research was supported by grants from the National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada to M.L.S. and D.R.W., and by an NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship (Doctoral level) to C.R.M.

Supplementary material

221_2014_3876_MOESM1_ESM.mpg (3.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (MPG 3458 kb)
221_2014_3876_MOESM2_ESM.mpg (3.6 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (MPG 3665 kb)
221_2014_3876_MOESM3_ESM.mpg (3.2 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (MPG 3248 kb)
221_2014_3876_MOESM4_ESM.mpg (3.6 mb)
Supplementary material 4 (MPG 3652 kb)
221_2014_3876_MOESM5_ESM.mpg (3.2 mb)
Supplementary material 5 (MPG 3252 kb)
221_2014_3876_MOESM6_ESM.mpg (3.3 mb)
Supplementary material 6 (MPG 3420 kb)

References

  1. Baron J, Pinto L, Dias MO, Lima B, Neuenschwander S (2007) Directional responses of visual wulst neurones to grating and plaid patterns in the awake owl. Eur J Neurosci 26:1950–1968PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bischof WF, Reid SL, Wylie DR, Spetch ML (1999) Perception of coherent motion in random dot displays by pigeons and humans. Percept Psychophys 61:1089–1101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boussaoud D, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG (1992) Subcortical connections of visual areas MST and FST in macaques. Vis Neurosci 9:291–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Britten KJ, van Wezel RJ (1998) Electrical microstimulation of cortical area MST biases heading perception in monkeys. Nat Neurosci 1:59–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burr DC, Thompson P (2011) Motion psychophysics: 1985–2010. Vis Res 51:1431–1456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burr DC, Badcock DR, Ross J (2001) Cardinal axes for radial and circular motion, revealed by summation and by masking. Vis Res 41:473–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler AB, Hodos W (2005) Comparative vertebrate neuroanatomy: evolution and adaptation, 2nd edn. Wiley-Liss, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaves LM, Hodos W, Gunturkun O (1993) Color-reversal learning: effects after lesions of thalamic visual structures in pigeons. Vis Neurosci 10:1099–1107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowder NA, Wylie DR (2001) Fast and slow neurons in the nucleus of the basal optic root in pigeons. Neurosci Lett 304:133–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dakin SC, Bex PJ (2002) Summation of concentric orientation structure: seeing the Glass or the window? Vis Res 42:2013–2020PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Distler C, Hoffmann K-P (2001) Cortical input to the nucleus of the optic tract and dorsal terminal nucleus (NOT-DTN) in macaques: a retrograde tracing study. Cereb Cortex 11:572–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duffy CJ, Wurtz RH (1991) Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. J Neurophysiol 65:1329–1345PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards M, Badcock DR (1993) Asymmetries in the sensitivity to motion in depth: a centripetal bias. Perception 22:1013–1023PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edwards M, Ibbotson MR (2007) Relative sensitivities to large-field optic-flow patterns varying in direction and speed. Perception 36:113–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frost BJ (1985) Neural mechanisms for detecting object motion and figure–ground boundaries contrasted with self-motion detecting systems. In: Ingle D, Jeannerod M, Lee D (eds) Brain mechanisms and spatial vision. Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 415–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geesaman BJ, Andersen RA (1996) The analysis of complex motion patterns by form/cue invariant MSTd neurons. J Neurosci 16:4716–4732PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibson JJ (1954) The visual perception of objective motion and subjective movement. Psychol Rev 64:304–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glass L (1969) Moire effect from random dots. Nature 223:578–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graziano MS, Andersen RA, Snowden RJ (1994) Tuning of MST neurons to spiral motions. J Neurosci 14:54–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gu Y, Wang Y, Zhang T, Wang S-R (2002) Stimulus size selectivity and receptive field organization of ectostriatal neurons in the pigeon. J Comp Physiol A 188:173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Güntürkün O (2000) Sensory Physiology: Vision. In: Whittow GC (ed) Sturkie’s avian physiology. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hellmann B, Güntürkün O, Manns M (2004) Tectal mosaic: organization of the descending tectal projections in comparison to the ascending tectofugal pathway in the pigeon. J Comp Neurol 472:395–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huk AC, Dougherty RF, Heeger DJ (2002) Retinotopy and functional subdivision of human areas MT and MST. J Neurosci 22:7195–7205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Husband S, Shimizu T (2001) Evolution of the avian visual system. In: Cook RG (ed) Avian visual cognition. www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/husband/
  25. Lazareva OF, Shimizu T, Wasserman EA (2012) How animals see the world: behavior, biology, and evolution of vision. Oxford University Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loidolt M, Aust U, Steurer M, Troje NF, Huber L (2006) Limits of dynamic object perception in pigeons: dynamic stimulus presentation does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape. Behaviour 34:71–85Google Scholar
  27. Maldonado PE, Maturana H, Varela DJ (1988) Frontal and lateral visual system in birds. Frontal and lateral gaze. Brain Behav Evol 32:57–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martinoya C, Rivaud S, Bloch S (1983) Comparing frontal a n d lateral viewing in the pigeon. II. velocity thresholds for movement discrimination. Behav Brain Res 8:375–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. May KA, Solomon JA (2013) Four theorems on the psychometric function. PLoS One 8(10):e74815PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meese TS, Anderson SJ (2002) Spiral mechanisms are required to account for summation of complex motion components. Vis Res 42:1073–1080PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meese TS, Harris MG (2001) Independent detectors for expansion and rotation, and for orthogonal components of deformation. Perception 30:1189–1202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Morrone MC, Burr DC, Di Pietro S, Stefanelli MA (1999) Cardinal directions for visual optic flow. Curr Biol 9:763–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morrone MC, Tosetti M, Montanaro D, Fiorentini A, Cioni G, Burr DC (2000) A cortical area that responds specifically to optic flow, revealed by fMRI. Nat Neurosci 3:1322–1328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nakayama K (1985) Biological image motion processing: a review. Vis Res 25:625–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nankoo J-F, Madan CR, Spetch ML, Wylie DR (2012) Perception of dynamic Glass patterns. Vis Res 72:55–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nguyen AP, Spetch ML, Crowder NA, Winship IR, Hurd PL, Wylie DRW (2004) A dissociation of motion and spatial-pattern vision in the avian telencephalon: implications for the evolution of “visual streams”. J Neurosci 24:4962–4970PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nye PW (1973) On the functional differences between frontal and lateral visual fields of the pigeon. Vis Res 13:559–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pelli DG, Farell B (1999) Why use noise? J Opt Soc Am A 16:647–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pitzalis S, Sereno MI, Committeri G, Fattori P, Galati G, Patria F, Galletti C (2010) Human V6: the medial motion area. Cereb Cortex 20:411–424PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Quick RF (1974) A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. Kybernetik 16:65–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rubene D, Håstad O, Tauson R, Wall H, Odeen A (2010) The presence of UV wavelengths improves the temporal resolution of the avian visual system. J Exp Biol 213:3357–3363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saito H, Yukie M, Tanaka K, Hikosaka K, Fukada Y, Iwai E (1986) Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci 6:145–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Scase MO, Braddick OJ, Raymond JE (1996) What is noise for the motion system? Vis Res 36:2579–2586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shimizu T, Bowers AN (1999) Visual pathways in the avian telencephalon: evolutionary implications. Behav Brain Res 98:183–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shimizu T, Patton TB, Husband S (2010) Avian visual behavior and the organization of the telencephalon. Brain Behav Evol 75:204–217PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shirai N, Kanazawa S, Yamaguchi MK (2006) Anisotropic motion coherence sensitivities to expansion/contraction motion in early infancy. Infant Child Dev 29:204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simpson JI (1984) The accessory optic system. Annu Rev Neurosci 7:13–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Snowden RJ, Milne AB (1996) The effects of adapting to complex motions: position invariance and tuning to spiral motions. J Cogn Neurosci 8:435–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tanaka K, Saito H (1989) Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 62:626–641PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Troje NF, Aust U (2013) What do you mean with “direction”? local and global cues to biological motion perception in pigeons. Vis Res 79:47–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Troje NF, Chang DHF (2013) Shape-independent processes in biological motion perception. In: Johnson KL, Shiffrar M (eds) People watching: social, perceptual, and neurophysiological studies of body perception. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 82–100Google Scholar
  54. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M (1982) Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW (eds) Analysis of visual behavior. MIT, Cambridge, pp 549–586Google Scholar
  55. Wall MB, Lingnau A, Ashida H, Smith AT (2008) Selective visual responses to expansion and rotation in the human MT complex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation. Eur J Neurosci 27:2747–2757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang YC, Jiang S, Frost BJ (1993) Visual processing in pigeon nucleus rotundus: luminance, color, motion, and looming subdivisions. Vis Neurosci 10:21–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Warren W (2004) Optic flow. In: Chalupa L, Werner J (eds) The visual neurosciences. MIT Press, Boston, pp 1391–1401Google Scholar
  58. Weibull W (1951) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 18:292–297Google Scholar
  59. Wilson HR, Wilkinson F (1998) Detection of global structure in Glass patterns: Implications for form vision. Vis Res 38:2933–2947PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wylie DR (2013) Processing of visual signals related to self-motion in the cerebellum of pigeons. Front Behav Neurosci 7:4PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wylie DRW, Crowder NA (2000) The spatiotemporal properties of fast and slow neurons in the pretectal lentiformis mesencephali in pigeons. J Neurophysiol 84:2529–2540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Wylie DR, Iwaniuk AN (2012) Neural mechanisms underlying visual motion detection in birds. In: Lazareva OF, Shimizu T, Wasserman EA (eds) How animals see the world: Behavior, biology, and evolution of vision. Oxford University Press, London, pp 289–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Xiao Q, Frost BJ (2009) Looming responses of telencephalic neurons in the pigeon are modulated by optic flow. Brain Res 1035:40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Xiao Q, Li DP, Wang SR (2006) Looming-sensitive responses and receptive field organization of telencephalic neurons in the pigeon. Brain Res Bull 68:322–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-François Nankoo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christopher R. Madan
    • 1
  • Marcia L. Spetch
    • 1
  • Douglas R. Wylie
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Centre for NeuroscienceUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations