Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 232, Issue 3, pp 1057–1070 | Cite as

Time flies when you are in a groove: using entrainment to mechanical resonance to teach a desired movement distorts the perception of the movement’s timing

  • Daniel K. Zondervan
  • Jaime E. Duarte
  • Justin B. Rowe
  • David J. Reinkensmeyer
Research Article

Abstract

The human motor system quickly entrains rhythmic limb movement to the resonant frequency of mechanical systems with which it interacts, suggesting that entrainment to an appropriately designed training device might be a convenient way to teach desired movements. We tested this possibility by asking healthy subjects (N = 30) to learn to move with a desired movement timing using a simple resonating arm training device: a lever attached to a manual wheelchair. The subjects tried to learn to roll the lever-driven wheelchair back and forth in place at a target frequency initially presented using a series of auditory beeps. One-third of the subjects trained without resonance and with no further feedback about rolling frequency; their performance did not improve. Another group trained with continual visual feedback of frequency error but no resonance; they quickly learned to roll the chair at the target frequency, as evidenced at both short-term and long-term (1 day later) retention tests. A third group trained with elastic bands attached to the lever that caused the system to resonate at the target frequency, providing a timing template. While these participants quickly entrained to the target frequency during training, they did not accurately reproduce this frequency when the system was no longer resonant, moving too slowly with the same systematic error at both the short-term and long-term retention tests. They also did not exhibit a timing aftereffect on the initial movements made when they transitioned from a resonant to non-resonant system or vice versa. This suggests they did not realize they were performing the task with a temporal error. Entrainment to mechanical resonance conveys usable information about movement timing, but seems to cause that movement timing to be perceived as slower than it actually is, as if a putative internal clock speeds up, which is a factor to consider in designing machine-assisted motor training.

Keywords

Resonance Motor learning Timing Continuous Discrete Time perception 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Machines Assisting Recovery from Stroke and Spinal Cord Injury for Reintegration into Society (MARS3), the National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Rehabilitation Robotics, H133E120010 and NIH-R01HD062744-01 from the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, part of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development.

References

  1. Abe MO, Yamada N (2003) Modulation of elbow joint stiffness in a vertical plane during cyclic movement at lower or higher frequencies than natural frequency. Exp Brain Res 153:394–399. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1583-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Tunik E, Merians AS (2009) Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review. NeuroRehabilitation 25:29–44PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahlborn BK, Blake RW (2002) Walking and running at resonance. Zool Jena Ger 105:165–174Google Scholar
  4. Ahn J, Patterson T, Lee H et al (2011) Feasibility of entrainment with ankle mechanical perturbation to treat locomotor deficit of neurologically impaired patients. IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 7474–7477Google Scholar
  5. Beatty MF (2006) Principles of engineering mechanics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, p 595Google Scholar
  6. Ben-Tov M, Levy-Tzedek S, Karniel A (2012) The effects of rhythmicity and amplitude on transfer of motor learning. PLoS ONE 7:e46983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046983 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bisi MC, Stagni R, Houdijk H, Gnudi G (2011) An EMG-driven model applied for predicting metabolic energy consumption during movement. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 21:1074–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.07.003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borg G (1982) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:377–381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown S (1997) Attentional resources in timing: interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks. Percept Psychophsy 59:1118–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown SW (2006) Timing and executive function: bidirectional interference between concurrent temporal production and randomization tasks. Memory Cognit 34:1464–1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christou EA, Rodriguez TM (2008) Time but not force is transferred between ipsilateral upper and lower limbs. J Mot Behav 40:186–189. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.40.3.186-189 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coull JT, Cheng R-K, Meck WH (2011) Neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates of timing. Neuropsychopharmacology 36:3–25. doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.113 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Droit-Volet S (2013) Time perception, emotions and mood disorders. J Physiol Paris. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2013.03.005
  14. Duarte JE, Gebrekristos B, Perez S et al (2013) Effort, performance, and motivation: insights from robot-assisted training of human golf putting and rat grip strength. Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2013:1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650461 Google Scholar
  15. Eek MN, Kroksmark A-K, Beckung E (2006) Isometric muscle torque in children 5 to 15 years of age: normative data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:1091–1099. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.05.012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliott MT, Welchman AE, Wing AM (2009) Being discrete helps keep to the beat. Exp Brain Res 192:731–737. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1646-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Emken JL, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2005) Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng 13:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emken JL, Benitez R, Sideris A et al (2007) Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort. J Neurophysiol 97:3997–4006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Faulkner J, Eston RG (2008) Perceived exertion research in the 21 st century: developments, reflections and questions for the future. Health (San Francisco) 6:1–14Google Scholar
  20. Faulkner JA, Claflin DR, McCully KK (1986) Power output of fast and slow fibers from human skeletal muscle. In: Jones NL, McCartney N, McComas J (eds) Human power output, Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, IL, USA p 81–89Google Scholar
  21. Fischer H, Kahn L, Pelosin E et al (2006) Can robot-assisted therapy promote generalization of motor learning following stroke?: preliminary results. In: Proceedings first IEEE/RAS-EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics, pp 865–868Google Scholar
  22. Futakata Y, Iwasaki T (2008) Formal analysis of resonance entrainment by central pattern generator. J Math Biol 57:183–207. doi: 10.1007/s00285-007-0151-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gibbon J (1977) Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing. Psychol Rev 84:279–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodman L, Riley MA, Mitra S, Turvey MT (2000) Advantages of rhythmic movements at resonance: minimal active degrees of freedom, minimal noise, and maximal predictability. J Mot Behav 32:3–8. doi: 10.1080/00222890009601354 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goss FL, Lagally KM, Jakicic JM et al (2002) Ratings of perceived exertion in active muscle during high-intensity and low-intensity. J Strength Cond Res 16:87–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Grindlay G (2008) Haptic guidance benefits musical motor learning. Symposium on haptic interfaces for virtual environment and teleoperator systems, pp 397–404Google Scholar
  27. Grondin S (2010) Timing and time perception: a review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings. Atten Percept Psychophys 72:561–582. doi: 10.3758/APP PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hass J, Blaschke S, Herrmann JM (2012) Cross-modal distortion of time perception: demerging the effects of observed and performed motion. PLoS ONE 7:e38092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038092 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hatsopoulos NG, Warren WH Jr (1996) Resonance tuning in rhythmic arm movements. J Mot Behav 28:3–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hawkins D, Molé P (1997) Modeling energy expenditure associated with isometric, concentric, and eccentric muscle action at the knee. Ann Biomed Eng 25:822–830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hemmes NS, Brown BL, Kladopoulos CN (2004) Time perception with and without a concurrent nontemporal task. Percept Psychophys 66:328–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hogan N, Sternad ÆD (2007) On rhythmic and discrete movements: reflections, definitions and implications for motor control. Exp Brain Res:13–30. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0899-y
  33. Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70Google Scholar
  34. Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM (2011) Separate representations of dynamics in rhythmic and discrete movements: evidence from motor learning. J Neurophysiol 105:1722–1731. doi: 10.1152/jn.00780.2010 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ikegami T, Hirashima M, Taga G, Nozaki D (2010) Asymmetric transfer of visuomotor learning between discrete and rhythmic movements. J Neurosci 30:4515–4521. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3066-09.2010 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Iwasaki T, Zheng M (2006) Sensory feedback mechanism underlying entrainment of central pattern generator to mechanical resonance. Biol Cybern 94:245–261. doi: 10.1007/s00422-005-0047-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jamurtas AZ, Theocharis V, Tofas T et al (2005) Comparison between leg and arm eccentric exercises of the same relative intensity on indices of muscle damage. Eur J Appl Physiol 95:179–185. doi: 10.1007/s00421-005-1345-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klein J, Spencer SJ, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2012) Breaking it down is better: haptic decomposition of complex movements aids in robot-assisted motor learning. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 20:268–275. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2195202 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kroger-Costa A, Machado A, Santos JA (2013) Effects of motion on time perception. Behav Process 95:50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kurtz S, Lee TD (2003) Part and whole perceptual-motor practice of a polyrhythm. Neurosci Lett 338:205–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levy-Tzedek S, Ben Tov M, Karniel A (2011) Rhythmic movements are larger and faster but with the same frequency on removal of visual feedback. J Neurophysiol 106:2120–2126. doi: 10.1152/jn.00266.2011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lichtwark GA, Wilson AM (2005) A modified Hill muscle model that predicts muscle power output and efficiency during sinusoidal length changes. J Exp Biol 208:2831–2843. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01709 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG et al (2010) Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 362:1772–1783. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911341 Google Scholar
  44. Lüttgen J, Heuer H (2012) Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics. Exp Brain Res 222:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3190-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2009) Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil 6:20. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-20 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marchal-Crespo L, McHughen S, Cramer SC, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2009) The effect of haptic guidance, aging, and initial skill level on motor learning of a steering task. Exp Brain Res 201:209–220PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Milot MH, Marchal-Crespo L, Green CS et al (2009) Comparison of error amplification and haptic guidance training techniques for learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy individuals. Exp Brain Res 201:119–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Molet M, Alessandri J, Zentall TR (2011) Subjective time: cognitive and physical secondary tasks affect timing differently. Q J Exp Psychol 64:1344–1353. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.552728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pandolf K (1978) Influence of local and central factors in dominating rated perceived exertion during physical work. Percept Mot Skills 46:683–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Patton JL, Stoykov ME, Kovic M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2006) Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Exp Brain Res 168:368–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Akoner OM, Ferris DP, Gordon KE (2009) Slacking by the human motor system: computational models and implications for robotic orthoses. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE engineering in medicine and biology conference, pp 2129–2132Google Scholar
  52. Robertson SD, Zelaznik HN, Lantero DA et al (1999) Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: evidence against a single timing process for motor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1316–1330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosenbaum DA, Slotta JD, Vaughan J, Plamondon R (1991) Optimal movement selection. Psychol Sci 2:86–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Royston JP (1982) Algorithm AS 181: the W test for normality. Appl Stat 31:176–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shafir T, Brown SH (2010) Timing and the control of rhythmic upper-limb movements. J Mot Behav 42:71–84. doi: 10.1080/00222890903397137 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sharp I, Patton J, Listenberger M, Case E (2011) Haptic/graphic rehabilitation: integrating a robot into a virtual environment library and applying it to stroke therapy. J Vis Exp 1–5. doi: 10.3791/3007
  57. Sigrist R, Rauter G, Riener R, Wolf P (2013) Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review. Psychon Bull Rev 20:21–53. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tsianos GA, Rustin C, Loeb GE (2012) Mammalian muscle model for predicting force and energetics during physiological behaviors. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 20:117–133. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2162851 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tucker R, Marle T, Lambert EV, Noakes TD (2006) The rate of heat storage mediates an anticipatory reduction in exercise intensity during cycling at a fixed rating of perceived exertion. J Physiol 574:905–915. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.101733 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Umberger BR, Gerritsen KGM, Martin PE (2003) A model of human muscle energy expenditure. Comp Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 6:99–111. doi: 10.1080/1025584031000091678 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van Asseldonk EH, Wessels M, Stienen AH et al (2009) Influence of haptic guidance in learning a novel visuomotor task. J Physiol Paris 103:276–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vercruyssen M, Hancock P, Mihaly T (1989) Time estimation performance before, during, and following physical activity. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo) 18:169–179Google Scholar
  63. Verdaasdonk BW, Koopman HFJM, Van der Helm FCT (2007) Resonance tuning in a neuro-musculo-skeletal model of the forearm. Biol Cybern 96:165–180. doi: 10.1007/s00422-006-0112-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wearden JH (2013) The cognitive neuroscience of time perception: how psychological studies might help to dissect the timing system. Neuropsychologia 51:187–190. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.035 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KH, Macko RF (2000) Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 31:2390–2395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wong JD, Kistemaker DA, Chin A, Gribble PL (2012) Can proprioceptive training improve motor learning? J Neurophysiol 108:3313–3321. doi: 10.1152/jn.00122.2012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zakay D (1993) Time estimation methods- do they influence prospective duration estimates? Perception 22:91–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zelaznik HN, Spencer RMC, Ivry RB (2002) Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28:575–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhou L, Bai S, Hansen MR, Rasmussen J (2011) Modeling of human arm energy expenditure for predicting energy optimal trajectories. Model Identif Control Nor Res Bull 32:91–101. doi: 10.4173/mic.2011.3.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zondervan DK, Palafox L, Hernandez J, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2013) The resonating arm exerciser: design and pilot testing of a mechanically passive rehabilitation device that mimics robotic active assistance. J NeuroEng Rehabil. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-39

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel K. Zondervan
    • 1
  • Jaime E. Duarte
    • 1
  • Justin B. Rowe
    • 2
  • David J. Reinkensmeyer
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of California at IrvineIrvineUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of California at IrvineIrvineUSA
  3. 3.Department of Anatomy and NeurobiologyUniversity of California at IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations