Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 232, Issue 2, pp 493–502 | Cite as

Age-related differences in postural control: effects of the complexity of visual manipulation and sensorimotor contribution to postural performance

  • Diana R. Toledo
  • José A. BarelaEmail author
Research Article


Patterns of adaptive changes to the exposure to a sinusoidal visual stimulus can be influenced by stimulus characteristics as well as the integrity of the sensory and motor systems involved in the task. Sensorimotor deficits due to aging might alter postural responses to visual manipulation, especially in more demanding tasks. The purpose of this study was to compare postural control between young and older adults at different levels of complexity and to examine whether possible sensory and/or motor changes account for postural performance differences in older adults. Older and young adults were submitted to the following tests: postural control assessments, i.e., body sway during upright stance and induced by movement of a visual scene (moving room paradigm); sensory assessments, i.e., visual (acuity and contrast sensitivity) and somatosensory (tactile foot sensitivity and detection of passive ankle motion); and motor assessments, i.e., isometric ankle torque and muscular activity latency after stance perturbation. Older adults had worse sensory and motor performance, larger body sway amplitude during stance and stronger coupling between body sway and moving room motion than younger adults. Multiple linear regression analyses indicated that the threshold for the detection of passive ankle motion contributed the most to variances in body sway and this contribution was more striking when visual information was manipulated in a more unpredictable way. The present study suggests that less accurate information about body position is more detrimental to controlling body position, mainly for older adults in more demanding tasks.


Posture Sensorimotor system Aging Moving room 



The authors are grateful for financial support from FAPESP/Brazil—Grant No. 06/54022-1.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. Allison LK, Kiemel T, Jeka JJ (2006) Multisensory reweighting of vision and touch is intact in healthy and fall-prone older adults. Exp Brain Res 175:342–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barela JA, Godoi D, Freitas Junior P, Polastri PF (2000) Visual information and body sway coupling in infants during sitting acquisition. Infant Behav Dev 23:285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barela JA, Jeka JJ, Clark JE (2003) Postural control in children: coupling to dynamic somatosensory information. Exp Brain Res 150:434–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barela AM, Barela JA, Rinaldi NM, de Toledo DR (2009) Influence of imposed optic flow characteristics and intention on postural responses. Mot Control 13:119–129Google Scholar
  5. Bertenthal BI, Bai DL (1989) Infant’s sensitivity to optical flow for controlling posture. Dev Psychol 25:936–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertenthal BI, Rose JL, Bai DL (1997) Perception-action coupling in the development of visual control of posture. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:1631–1643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonfim TR, Jansen Paccola CA, Barela JA (2003) Proprioceptive and behavior impairments in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:1217–1223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brucki SMD, Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Bertolucci PHF, Okamoto IH (2003) Sugestões para o uso do mini-exame do estado mental no Brasil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 61:777–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Freitas PB, Knight CA, Barela JA (2010) Postural reactions following forward platform perturbation in young, middle-age, and old adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 20(4):693–700Google Scholar
  10. Di Fabio RP, Emasithi A (1997) Aging and the mechanisms underlying head and postural control during voluntary motion. Physical Ther 77:458–475Google Scholar
  11. Dijkstra TM, Schoner G, Giese MA, Gielen CC (1994) Frequency dependence of the action-perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment: relative phase dynamics. Biol Cybern 71:489–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferrell WR, Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI (1987) The role of joint receptors in human kinaesthesia when intramuscular receptors cannot contribute. J Physiol 386:63–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitzpatrick R, McCloskey DI (1994) Proprioceptive, visual and vestibular thresholds for the perception of sway during standing in humans. J Physiol 478:173–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freitas Junior PB, Barela JA (2004) Postural control as a function of self- and object-motion perception. Neurosci Lett 369:64–68. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.075S0304-3940(04)00959-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friden T, Roberts D, Zatterstrom R, Lindstrand A, Moritz U (1997) Proprioception after an acute knee ligament injury: a longitudinal study on 16 consecutive patients. J Orthop Res 15:637–644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilsing MG, Van den Bosch CG, Lee SG, Ashton-Miller JA, Alexander NB, Schultz AB, Ericson WA (1995) Association of age with the threshold for detecting ankle inversion and eversion in upright stance. Age Ageing 24:58–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Godoi D, Barela JA (2008) Body sway and sensory motor coupling adaptation in children: effects of distance manipulation. Dev Psychobiol 50:77–87. doi: 10.1002/dev.20272 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hakkinen K, Pastinen UM, Karsikas R, Linnamo V (1995) Neuromuscular performance in voluntary bilateral and unilateral contraction and during electrical stimulation in men at different ages. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 70:518–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hay L, Bard C, Fleury M, Teasdale N (1996) Availability of visual and proprioceptive afferent messages and postural control in elderly adults. Exp Brain Res 108:129–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horak FB, Diener HC, Nashner LM (1989a) Influence of central set on human postural responses. J Neurophysiol 62:841–853PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Horak FB, Shupert CL, Mirka A (1989b) Components of postural dyscontrol in the elderly: a review. Neurobiol Aging 10:727–738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horak FB, Macpherson JM (1996) Postural orientation and equilibrium. In: Rowell L, Shepherd JT (eds) Handbook of physiology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 255–292Google Scholar
  24. Hurley MV, Rees J, Newham DJ (1998) Quadriceps function, proprioceptive acuity and functional performance in healthy young, middle-aged and elderly subjects. Age Ageing 27:55–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jeka JJ, Allison LK, Kiemel T (2010) The dynamics of visual reweighting in healthy and fall-prone older adults. J Mot Behav 42:197–208. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2010.481693 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kjaer PK, Salomão SR, Belfort Júnior R, Colella ALD (2000) Validação clínica de teste psicofísico computadorizado para avaliação de visão de cores e sensibilidade ao contraste. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia 63:185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuo AD (2005) An optimal state estimation model of sensory integration in human postural balance. J Neural Eng 2:S235–S249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee DN, Aronson E (1974) Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants. Percept Psychophys 15:529–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee DN, Lishman JR (1975) Visual proprioceptive control of stance. J Hum Mov Stud 1:87–95Google Scholar
  30. Lord SR, Menz HB (2000) Visual contributions to postural stability in older adults. Gerontology 46:306–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lord SR, Ward JA (1994) Age-associated differences in sensori-motor function and balance in community dwelling women. Age Ageing 23:452–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lord SR, Clark RD, Webster IW (1991) Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in relation to falls in an elderly population. Age Ageing 20:175–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mackey DC, Robinovitch SN (2006) Mechanisms underlying age-related differences in ability to recover balance with the ankle strategy. Gait Posture 23:59–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maki BE, McIlroy WE (1996) Postural control in the older adult. Clin Geriatr Med 12:635–658PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Menz HB, Morris ME, Lord SR (2006) Foot and ankle risk factors for falls in older people: a prospective study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61:866–870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mergner T, Hlavacka F, Schweigart G (1993) Interaction of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs. J Vestib Res 3:41–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Musolino MC, Loughlin PJ, Sparto PJ, Redfern MS (2006) Spectrally similar periodic and non-periodic optic flows evoke different postural sway responses. Gait Posture 23:180–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nashner LM (1981) Analysis of stance posture in humans. In: Towe AL, Luschei ES (eds) Motor coordination (handbook of behavioral neurology, vol 5). Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp 527–565Google Scholar
  39. Peterka RJ (2002) Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol 88:1097–1118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Petrella RJ, Lattanzio PJ, Nelson MG (1997) Effect of age and activity on knee joint proprioception. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 76:235–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Polastri PF, Barela JA, Kiemel T, Jeka JJ (2012) Dynamics of inter-modality re-weighting during human postural control. Exp Brain Res 223:99–108. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3244-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prioli AC, Freitas Junior PB, Barela JA (2005) Physical activity and postural control in the elderly: coupling between visual information and body sway. Gerontology 51:145–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prioli AC, Cardozo AS, de Freitas Junior PB, Barela JA (2006) Task demand effects on postural control in older adults. Hum Mov Sci 25:435–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rauch SD, Velazquez-Villasenor L, Dimitri PS, Merchant SN (2001) Decreasing hair cell counts in aging humans. Ann N Y Acad Sci 942:220–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Refshauge KM, Fitzpatrick RC (1995) Perception of movement at the human ankle: effects of leg position. J Physiol 448:243–248Google Scholar
  46. Rinaldi NM, Polastri PF, Barela JA (2009) Age-related changes in postural control sensory reweighting. Neurosci Lett 467:225–229. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.10.042 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Semmes J, Weinstein S, Ghent L, Teuber H (1960) Somatosensory changes after penetrating brain wounds in man. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  48. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M (2000) Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:M10–M16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stoffregen TA (1985) Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:554–565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sue S (2007) Test distance vision using a Snellen chart. Community Eye Health 20:52PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Teasdale N, Stelmach GE, Breunig A, Meeuwsen HJ (1991) Age differences in visual sensory integration. Exp Brain Res 85:691–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thelen DG, Brockmiller C, Ashton-Miller JA, Schultz AB, Alexander NB (1998) Thresholds for sensing foot dorsi- and plantarflexion during upright stance: effects of age and velocity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 53:M33–M38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wade MG, Lindquist R, Taylor JR, Treat-Jacobson D (1995) Optical flow, spatial orientation, and the control of posture in the elderly. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 50:P51–P58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Woollacott MH, Shumway-Cook A, Nashner LM (1986) Aging and posture control: changes in sensory organization and muscular coordination. Int J Aging Hum Dev 23:97–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Young A, Skelton DA (1994) Applied physiology of strength and power in old age. Int J Sports Med 15:149–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, Neuroscience ProgramUniversity of Sao Paulo EPUSP, PTCSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Institute of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences and Graduate Program in Human Movement SciencesCruzeiro do Sul UniversitySão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Institute of BioscienceSao Paulo State UniversityRio ClaroBrazil
  4. 4.Instituto de Ciências da Atividade Física e Esporte, ICAFESão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations