Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 231, Issue 4, pp 397–403 | Cite as

Selective changes in cerebellar-cortical processing following motor training

Research Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of varying stimulation rate and the effects of a repetitive typing task on the amplitude of somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) peaks thought to relate to cerebellar processing. SEPs (2,000 sweep averages) were recorded following median nerve stimulation at the wrist at frequencies of 2.47, 4.98, and 9.90 Hz from 12 subjects before and after a 20-min repetitive typing task. Typing and error rate were recorded 2-min pre- and post-typing task. Effect of stimulation rate was analysed with ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons (paired t tests). Typing effects were analysed by performing two-tailed paired t tests. Increasing stimulation frequency significantly decreased the N30 SEP peak amplitude (p < 0.02). Both the 4.98 and 9.90 Hz rates lead to significantly smaller N30 peak amplitudes compared to the 2.47 Hz (p ≤ 0.01). The N24 amplitude significantly increased following the typing task for both 4.98 and 2.47 Hz (p ≤ 0.025). In contrast, there was a highly significant decrease (p < 0.001) in the N18 peak amplitude post-typing at all frequencies. Typing rate increased (p < 0.001) and error rate decreased (p < 0.05) following the typing task. The results suggest that the N24 SEP peak amplitude is best recorded at 4.98 Hz since the N30 amplitude decreases and no longer contaminates the N24 peak, making the N24 visible and easier to measure, while still enabling changes due to repetitive activity to be measured. The decrease in N18 amplitude along with an increase in N24 amplitude with no change in N20 amplitude may be explained by the intervention reducing inhibition at the level of the cuneate nucleus and/or interior olives leading to alterations in cerebellar-cortical processing.

Keywords

Cerebellum Cortical plasticity Repetitive movement Somatosensory evoked potentials Human 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jessica Bosse and Julian Daligadu for assistance with the data collection process.

References

  1. Apps R, Garwicz M (2005) Anatomical and physiological foundations of cerebellar information processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:297–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attwell PJE, Cooke SF, Yeo CH (2002) Cerebellar function in consolidation of a motor memory. Neuron 34(6):1011–1020PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkley K, Budell R, Blomqvist A, Bull M (1986) Output systems of the dorsal column nuclei in the cat. Brain Res 396:199–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloedel JR (2004) Task-dependent role of the cerebellum in motor learning. Prog Brain Res 143:319–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Catalan MJ, Honda M, Weeks RA, Cohen LG, Hallett M (1998) The functional neuroanatomy of simple and complex sequential finger movements: a PET study. Brain 121(2):253–264Google Scholar
  6. Cheron G, Borenstein S (1987) Specific gating of the early somatosensory evoked potentials during active movement. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 67(6):537–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheron G, Borenstein S (1991) Gating of the early components of the frontal and parietal somatosensory evoked potentials in different sensory-motor interference modalities. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 80(6):522–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Del Olmo MF, Cheeran B, Koch G, Rothwell JC (2007) Role of the cerebellum in externally paced rhythmic finger movements. J Neurophysiol 98:145–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doyon J, Song AW, Karni A, Lalonde F, Adams MM, Ungerleider LG (2002) Experience-dependent changes in cerebellar contributions to motor sequence learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:1017–1022PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doyon J, Penhune V, Ungerleider LG (2003) Distinct contribution of the cortico-striatal and cortico-cerebellar systems to motor skill learning. Neuropsychologia 41(3):252–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fujii M, Yamada T, Aihara M, Kokubun Y, Noguchi Y, Matsubara M, Yeh MH (1994) The effects of stimulus rates upon median, ulnar and radial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92(6):518–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garcia Larrea L, Bastuji H, Mauguiere F (1992) Unmasking of cortical SEP components by changes in stimulus rate: a topographic study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 84(1):71–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haavik Taylor H, Murphy B (2007) Altered cortical integration of dual somatosensory input following the cessation of a 20 minute period of repetitive muscle activity. Exp Brain Res 178(4):488–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hand P, Winkle T (1977) The efferent connections of the feline nucleus cuneatus. J Comp Neurol 171:83–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ioffe ME, Chernikova LA, Ustinova KI (2007) Role of cerebellum in learning postural tasks. Cerebellum 6(1):87–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Manto M, Bastian AJ (2007) Cerebellum and the deciphering of motor coding. Cerebellum 6(1):3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Manzano GM, Negrao N, Nobrega JAM (1998) The N18 component of the median nerve SEP is not reduced by vibration. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:440–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Manzoni D (2007) The cerebellum and sensorimotor coupling: looking at the problem from the perspective of vestibular reflexes. Cerebellum 6(1):24–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller GA (1994) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 101(2):343–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Molinari M, Leggio MG, Thaut MH (2007) The cerebellum and neural networks for rhythmic sensorimotor synchronization in the human brain. Cerebellum 6(1):18–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murphy BA, Haavik Taylor H, Wilson SA, Oliphant G, Mathers KM (2003) Rapid reversible changes to multiple levels of the human somatosensory system following the cessation of repetitive contractions: a somatosensory evoked potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 114(8):1531–1537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Noel P, Ozaki I, Desmedt JE (1996) Origin of N18 and P14 far-fields of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials studied in patients with a brain-stem lesion. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 98(2):167–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nuwer MR, Aminoff M, Desmedt J, Eisen AA, Goodin D, Matsuoka S, Mauguiere F, Shibasaki H, Sutherling W, Vibert JF (1994) IFCN recommended standards for short latency somatosensory evoked potentials. Report of an IFCN committee. International federation of clinical neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 91(1):6–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Penhume VB, Doyon J (2002) Dynamic cortical and subcortical networks in learning and delayed recall of timed motor sequences. J Neurosci 22:1397–1406Google Scholar
  25. Restuccia D, Valeriani M, Barba C, Le Pera D, Capecci M, Filippini V, Molinari M (2001) Functional changes of the primary somatosensory cortex in patients with unilateral cerebellar lesions. Brain 124(Pt 4):757–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rossi S, della Volpe R, Ginanneschi F, Ulivelli M, Bartalini S, Spidalieri R, Rossi A (2003) Early somatosensory processing during tonic muscle pain in humans: relation to loss of proprioception and motor ‘defensive’ strategies. Clin Neurophysiol 114(7):1351–1358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rossini PM, Caramia D, Bassetti MA, Pasqualetti P, Tecchio F, Bernardi G (1996) Somatosensory evoked potentials during the ideation and execution of individual finger movements. Muscle Nerve 19(2):191–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sadato N, Ibañez V, Deiber M-P, Campbell G, Leonardo M, Hallett M (1996) Frequency-dependent changes of regional cerebral blood flow during finger movements. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 16(1):23–33Google Scholar
  29. Sonoo M (2000) Anatomic origin and clinical application of the widespread N18 potential in median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 17(3):258–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sonoo M, Sakuta M, Shimpo T, Genba K, Mannen T (1991) Widespread N18 in median nerve SEP is preserved in a pontine lesion. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 80(3):238–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sonoo M, Genba K, Zai W, Iwata M, Mannen T, Kanazawa I (1992) Origin of the widespread N18 in median nerve SEP. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 84:418–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sonoo M, Kobayashi M, Genba-Shimizu K, Mannen T, Shimizu T (1996) Detailed analysis of the latencies of median nerve somatosensory evoked potential components, 1: selection of the best standard parameters and the establishment of normal values. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 100:319–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ulas UH, Odabasi Z, Ozdag F, Eroglu E, Vural O (1999) Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials: recording with cephalic and noncephalic references. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 39(8):473–477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Valeriani M, Restuccia D, Di Lazzaro V, Le Pera D, Barba C, Tonali P, Mauguiere F (1998) Dipolar sources of the early scalp somatosensory evoked potentials to upper limb stimulation; effects of increasing stimulus rates. Exp Brain Res 120:306–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research DivisionNew Zealand College of ChiropracticAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of Ontario Institute of TechnologyOshawaCanada

Personalised recommendations