Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 231, Issue 1, pp 85–96 | Cite as

Pause time alters the preparation of two-component movements

  • Michael C. Bajema
  • Colum D. MacKinnon
  • Michael J. Carter
  • Michael Kennefick
  • Sam Perlmutter
  • Anthony N. Carlsen
Research Article
  • 167 Downloads

Abstract

Targeted reciprocal aiming movements are pervasive in everyday life, but it is unclear how the timing parameters between task elements affect the preparation of these movements. This study used a loud (124 dB) startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) to probe how changes in the pause time between the outward and return components of a reciprocal aiming task affected the preparatory state of the motor system. Participants performed a visually guided wrist extension–flexion task to a target located at 20° from the start position and were instructed to pause the movement within the wrist extension target zone for either 50, 200, or 500 ms. A SAS was presented during 25 % of trials before either the onset of the wrist extension (out) or flexion (return) components of the task to determine how motor preparation was affected by task requirements. Results showed that the presentation of a SAS prior to the initial outward movement led to significantly earlier onsets of both the outward and return components (p < .05), indicating that the pause time in the planned action was pre-planned. For the longer (200, 500 ms) pause-time conditions, a SAS delivered prior to returning from the target region triggered the return portion of the movement early. These findings suggest that the shortest pause-time movement (50 ms) was preplanned as a single action, whereas for reciprocal movements with longer pause times at least the initial part of the movement and the timing of the pause were preplanned and integrated, while the return portion was more independent.

Keywords

Movement planning Aiming Startle Complexity Pause time 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Supported by NSERC discovery grant awarded to ANC.

References

  1. Adam JJ, Paas FGWC, Eyssen ICJM, Slingerland H, Bekkering H, Drost M (1995) The control of two-element, reciprocal aiming movements: evidence for chunking. Hum Mov Sci 14:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam JJ, Nieuwenstein JH, Huys R, Paas FG, Kingma H, Willems P, Werry M (2000) Control of rapid aimed hand movements: the one-target advantage. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:295–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alibiglou L, MacKinnon CD (2012) The early release of planned movement by acoustic startle can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 590:919–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berardelli A, Hallett M, Rothwell JC, Agostino R, Manfredi M, Thompson PD, Marsden CD (1996) Single-joint rapid arm movements in normal subjects and in patients with motor disorders. Brain 119:661–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchanan JJ, Park JH, Shea CH (2006) Target width scaling in a repetitive aiming task: switching between cyclical and discrete units of action. Exp Brain Res 175:710–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlsen AN, MacKinnon CD (2010) Motor preparation is modulated by the resolution of the response timing information. Brain Res 1322:38–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlsen AN, Chua R, Inglis JT, Sanderson DJ, Franks IM (2004a) Can prepared responses be stored subcortically? Exp Brain Res 159:301–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlsen AN, Chua R, Inglis JT, Sanderson DJ, Franks IM (2004b) Prepared movements are elicited early by startle. J Motor Behav 36:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlsen AN, Maslovat D, Lam MY, Chua R, Franks IM (2011) Considerations for the use of a startling acoustic stimulus in studies of motor preparation in humans. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:366–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlsen AN, Maslovat D, Franks IM (2012) Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: evidence from startle. Clin Neurophysiol 123:21–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chamberlin CJ, Magill RA (1989) Preparation and control of rapid, multisegmented responses in simple and choice environments. Res Q Exerc Sport 60:256–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cressman EK, Franks IM, Enns JT, Chua R (2006) No automatic pilot for visually guided aiming based on colour. Exp Brain Res 171:174–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Day BL, Brown P (2001) Evidence for subcortical involvement in the visual control of human reaching. Brain 124:1832–1840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drummond NM, Carlsen AN, Cressman EK (2013) Motor preparation is delayed for both directly and indirectly cued movements during an anticipation-timing task. Brain Res 1506:44–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischman MG (1984) Programming time as a function of number of movement parts and changes in movement direction. J Motor Behav 16:405–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Franks IM, Nagelkerke P, Ketelaars M, van Donkelaar P (1998) Response preparation and control of movement sequences. Can J Exp Psychol 52:93–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henry FM, Rogers DE (1960) Increased response latency for complicated movements and a memory drum theory of neuromotor reaction. Res Q 31:448–458Google Scholar
  19. Hodges PW, Bui BH (1996) A comparison of computer-based methods for the determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 101:511–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howell DC (2010) Statistical methods for psychology. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CAGoogle Scholar
  21. Kasai T, Seki H (1992) Premotor reaction-time (PMT) of the reversal elbow extension-flexion as a function of response complexity. Hum Mov Sci 11:319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ketelaars MAC, Garry MI, Franks IM (1997) On-line programming of simple movement sequences. Hum Mov Sci 16:461–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khan MA, Tremblay L, Cheng DT, Luis M, Mourton SJ (2008) The preparation and control of reversal movements as a single unit of action. Exp Brain Res 187:33–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klapp ST (1995) Motor response programming during simple and choice-reaction time: the role of practice. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:1015–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klapp ST (2003) Reaction time analysis of two types of motor preparation for speech articulation: action as a sequence of chunks. J Motor Behav 35:135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lavrysen A, Helsen WF, Elliott D, Adam JJ (2002) The one-target advantage: advanced preparation or online processing? Mot Control 6:230–245Google Scholar
  27. Maslovat D, Carlsen AN, Ishimoto R, Chua R, Franks IM (2008) Response preparation changes following practice of an asymmetrical bimanual movement. Exp Brain Res 190:239–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maslovat D, Carlsen AN, Chua R, Franks IM (2009) Response preparation changes during practice of an asynchronous bimanual movement. Exp Brain Res 195:383–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pisella L, Grea H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Desmurget M, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y (2000) An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nat Neurosci 3:729–736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reynolds RF, Day BL (2007) Fast visuomotor processing made faster by sound. J Physiol (Lond) 583:1107–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thackray RI, Touchstone RM, Jones KN (1972) Effects of simulated sonic booms on tracking performance and autonomic response. Aerosp Med 43:13–20Google Scholar
  32. Valls-Solé J, Rothwell JC, Goulart F, Cossu G, Muñoz E (1999) Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans. J Physiol (Lond) 516:931–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Valls-Solé J, Kumru H, Kofler M (2008) Interaction between startle and voluntary reactions in humans. Exp Brain Res 187:497–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Donkelaar P, Franks IM (1991) The effects of changing movement velocity and complexity on response preparation: evidence from latency, kinematic, and EMG measures. Exp Brain Res 83:618–632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vlasak M (1969) Effect of startle stimuli on performance. Aerosp Med 40:124–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zelaznik HZ, Hawkins B, Kisselburgh L (1983) Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. J Motor Behav 15:217–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael C. Bajema
    • 1
  • Colum D. MacKinnon
    • 2
  • Michael J. Carter
    • 3
  • Michael Kennefick
    • 3
  • Sam Perlmutter
    • 4
  • Anthony N. Carlsen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Human KineticsUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  4. 4.Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement SciencesNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations