Athletes and novices are differently capable to recognize feint and non-feint actions
- 569 Downloads
Fast motor reactions in sports often require the ability to predict the intended action of an opponent as early as possible. Therefore, the present paper investigates whether beach volleyball athletes are able to recognize different attack hits (i.e. smash vs. poke shot) at an earlier stage of the movement than novices. Beach volleyball athletes and novices took part in a response priming experiment (Experiment 1). Participants had to decide whether a presented target picture depicts a smash or a poke shot. Importantly, the preceding prime pictures were taken from different stages of the movements varying between the jump (beginning of the movements) and the hand-ball contact (end of the movements). Diverging response congruency effects was found for athletes and novices. Athletes were able to recognize at an earlier movement stage than novices which kind of attack hit was shown at the prime picture. It is suggested that athletes might implicitly read movement-related patterns in the depicted athlete’s body posture (e.g. the angle of the elbow). In contrast, novices might use information which is easier to access (e.g. hand-ball relation). In a second experiment, novice participants received a visual training to test for a potential perceptual source of the priming effects. Notably, participants did not improve their ability to differentiate the volleyball techniques, indicating that a better recognition performance in athletes is based on motor and not on perceptual expertise.
KeywordsAction representation Motor expertise Priming Feint action
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Abernethy B, Russell DG (1984) Advance cue utilisation by skilled cricket batsmen. Aust J Sci Med Sport 16(2):2–10Google Scholar
- Abernethy B, Russell DG (1987) Expert-novice differences in an applied selective attention task. J Sport Psychol 9(4):326–345Google Scholar
- Hagemann N, Strauss B, Canal-Bruland R (2006) Training perceptual skill by orienting visual attention. J Sport Exerc Psychol 28(2):143–158Google Scholar
- Neumann O, Klotz W (1994) Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: where is the limit of direct parameter specification. In: Umilta C, Moscovitch M (eds) Attention and performance XV. Conscious and nonconscious information processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 123–150Google Scholar
- Raab M, Johnson J (2008) Implicit learning as a means to intuitive decision making in sports. In: Plessner H, Betsch C, Betsch T (eds) Intuition in judgement and decision making. Taylor and Franics Group, New York, pp 119–133Google Scholar
- Schack T (2012) Measuring mental representations. In: Tenenbaum G, Eklund RC, Kamata A (eds) Measurement in sport and exercise psychology. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, pp 203–214Google Scholar
- Williams AM, Ward P (2007) Anticipation and decision-making: exploring new horizons. In: Tenenbaum G, Eklund R (eds) Handbook of sport psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 203–223Google Scholar