Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 229, Issue 4, pp 621–633 | Cite as

The effects of aging on the asymmetry of inter-limb transfer in a visuomotor task

Research Article


The direction of the asymmetry of inter-limb transfer has been suggested to identify the specialization of each hemisphere when performing a motor task. In an earlier study, we showed that trajectory information is only transferred from the right to the left hand, while final movement outcome-associated parameters transferred in both directions when right-hand-dominant individuals perform a motor task with visual distorted feedback. In the current study, we try to replicate this finding in young adults and test whether the asymmetry of inter-limb transfer in visuomotor task reduces in older adults, suggesting that hemispheric lateralization reduces with age. Young and older adults (all right-hand-dominant) performed a multidirectional point-to-point drawing task in which the visual feedback was rotated and the gain was increased. Half of the participants in each age group trained with the right hand and the other half trained with the left hand. Performances of both hands with non-distorted and distorted visual feedback were collected from all participants before and after the training session. The results showed that the pattern of inter-limb transfer was similar between young and older adults, i.e., inter-limb transfer is asymmetric for initial direction and symmetric for movement time and trajectory length. The results suggest that older adults retain the specialized functions of the non-dominant (right) hemisphere allowing them to program movement direction of a graphic aiming task when visual feedback is distorted.


Aging Inter-limb transfer Hemispheric lateralization Visuomotor task Drawing 



This research was partially funded by an LSU Life Course and Aging Center (LCAC) graduate assistant enhancement and a Lillia Oleson Scholarship award. The preliminary results were presented at the Conference of Progress in Motor Control VIII (PMCVIII), Cincinnati, OH, 2011.


  1. Anguera JA, Russell CA, Noll DC, Seidler RD (2007) Neural correlates associated with intermanual transfer of sensorimotor adaptation. Brain Res 1185:136–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balitsky Thompson AK, Henriques DYP (2010) Visuomotor adaptation and intermanual transfer under different viewing conditions. Exp Brain Res 202(3):543–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabeza R (2002) Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. Psychol Aging 17(1):85–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabeza R, Anderson ND, Locantore JK, McIntosh AR (2002) Aging gracefully: compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults. NeuroImage 17(3):1394–1402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabeza R, Daselaar SM, Dolcos F, Prince SE, Budde M, Nyberg L (2004) Task-independent and task-specific age effects on brain activity during working memory, visual attention and episodic retrieval. Cereb Cortex 14(4):364–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Donchin O, Gazzaniga MS, Shadmehr R (2003) Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. J Neurophysiol 89(1):168–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Fabio RP, Emasithi A (1997) Aging and the mechanisms underlying head and postural control during voluntary motion. Phys Ther 77(5):458–475PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiat Res 12(3):189–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gazzaniga MS (1970) The Bisected brain. Neuroscience series, 2. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghilardi M, Ghze C, Dhawan V, Moeller J, Mentis M, Nakamura T, Antonini A, Eidelberg D (2000) Patterns of regional brain activation associated with different forms of motor learning. Brain Res 871:127–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hellige JB (1993) Hemispheric asymmetry: what’s right and what’s left. Perspectives in cognitive neuroscience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  12. Hicks RE (1974) Asymmetry of bilateral transfer. Am J Psychol 87(4):667–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hinder MR, Schmidt MW, Garry MI, Carroll TJ, Summers JJ (2011) Absence of cross-limb transfer of performance gains following ballistic motor practice in older adults. J Appl Physiol 110:166–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hinder MR, Carroll TJ, Summers JJ (2013) Inter-limb transfer of ballistic motor skill following non-dominant limb training in young and older adults3. Exp Brain Res 227:19–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Imamizu H, Shimojo S (1995) The locus of visual-motor learning at the task of manipulator level—implications from intermanual transfer. J Exp Psychol Human 21(4):719–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Inoue K, Kawashima R, Satoh K, Kinomura S, Goto R, Sugiura M, Ito M, Fukuda H (1997) Activity in the parietal area during visuomotor learning with optical rotation. Neuroreport 8(18):3979–3983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Inoue K, Kawashima R, Satoh K, Kinomura S, Sugiura M, Goto R, Ito M, Fuckuda H (2000) A PET study of visuomotor learning under optical rotation. Neuroimage 11:505–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Mentis M, Barnes A, Veytsman M, Eidelberg D, Ghez C (2004) Differential cortical and subcortical activations in learning rotations and gains for reaching: a PET study. J Neurophysiol 91(2):924–933 Google Scholar
  19. Kumar S, Mandal MK (2005) Bilateral transfer of skill in left- and right-handers. Laterality 10(4):337–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Langan J, Seidler RD (2011) Age differences in spatial working memory contributions to visuomotor adaptation and transfer. Behav Brain Res 225(1):160–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Langan J, Peltier SJ, Bo J, Fling BW, Welsh RC, Seidler RD (2010) Functional implications of age differences in motor system connectivity. Frontiers Syst Neurosci 4:17Google Scholar
  22. Mutha PK, Sainburg RL, Haaland KY (2011) Left parietal regions are critical for adaptive visuomotor control. J Neurosci 31(19):6972–6981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mutha PK, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL (2012) The effects of brain lateralization on motor control and adaptation. J Mot Behav 44(6):455–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. National Institute on Aging and the World Health Organization (2011) Global health and aging. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington. Retrieved from http://www.nia.nih.gov/sites/default/files/global_health_and_aging.pdf
  25. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1):97–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pai YC, Wening JD, Runtz EF, Iqbal K, Pavol MJ (2003) Role of feedforward control of movement stability in reducing slip-related balance loss and falls among older adults. J Neurophysiol 90(2):755–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pan Z, Van Gemmert AWA (2013) The direction of bilateral transfer depends on the performance parameter. Hum Move Sci, http:dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.humov.2012.02.013
  28. Parlow SE, Kinsbourne M (1989) Asymmetrical transfer of training between hands—implications for interhemispheric communication in normal brain. Brain Cogn 11(1):98–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Przybyla A, Haaland KY, Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL (2011) Motor asymmetry reduction in older adults. Neuros Lett 489(2):99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sainburg RL (2002) Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res 142(2):241–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sainburg RL, Wang J (2002) Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information. Exp Brain Res 145(4):437–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schaefer S, Schumacher V (2011) The interplay between cognitive and motor functioning in healthy older adults: findings from dual-task studies and suggestions for intervention. Gerontology 57(3):239–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seidler RD (2007) Aging affects motor learning but not savings at transfer of learning. Learn Mem 14(1–2):17–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taylor HG, Heilman KM (1980) Left-hemisphere motor dominance in righthanders. Cortex 16(4):587–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Teixeira LA (2000) Timing and force components in bilateral transfer of learning. Brain Cogn 44(3):455–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thut G, Cook ND, Regard M, Leenders KL, Halsband U, Landis T (1996) Intermanual transfer of proximal and distal motor engrams in humans. Exp Brain Res 108(2):321–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walker N, Philbin DA, Fisk AD (1997) Age-related differences in movement control: adjusting submovement structure to optimize performance. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 52(1):P40–P52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang J, Sainburg RL (2004) Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is symmetrical. J Neurophysiol 92:349–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang J, Sainburg RL (2006) The symmetry of interlimb transfer depends on workspace locations. Exp Brain Res 170(4):464–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang J, Przybyla A, Wuebbenhorst K, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL (2011) Aging reduces asymmetries in interlimb transfer of visuomotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 210(2):283–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fine Motor Control and Learning Laboratory, School of KinesiologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations