Imagined actions in multiple sclerosis patients: evidence of decline in motor cognitive prediction
Motor imagery is a mental process during which subjects internally simulate a movement without any motor output. Mental and actual movement durations are similar in healthy adults (isochrony) while temporal discrepancies (anisochrony) could be an expression of neurological deficits on action representation. It is unclear whether patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) preserve the capacity to simulate their own movements. This study investigates the ability of PwMS to predict their own actions by comparing temporal features of dominant and non-dominant actual and mental actions. Fourteen PwMS and nineteen healthy subjects (HS) were asked to execute and to imagine pointing arm movements among four pairs of targets of different sizes. Task duration was calculated for both actual and mental movements by an optoelectronic device. Results showed temporal consistency and target-by-target size modulation in actual movements through the four cycles for both groups with significantly longer actual and mental movement durations in PwMS with respect to HS. An index of performance (IP) was used to examine actual/mental isochrony properties in the two groups. Statistical analysis on IP showed in PwMS significantly longer actual movement durations with respect to mental movement durations (anisochrony), more relevant for the non-dominant than dominant arm. Mental prediction of motor actions is not well preserved in MS where motor and cognitive functional changes are present. Differences in performing imagined task with dominant and non-dominant arm could be related to increased cognitive effort required for performing non-dominant movements.
KeywordsMultiple sclerosis Motor imagery Forward internal model Isochrony Motor cognition
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Cho HY, Kim JS, Lee GC (2012) Effects of motor imagery training on balance and gait abilities in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- Heremans E, D’Hooge A M, De Bondt S, Helsen W, Feys P (2012) The relation between cognitive and motor dysfunction and motor imagery ability in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 18(3):1303–1309Google Scholar
- Human Experimentation: Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) (1964) Can Med Assoc J 91(11):619Google Scholar
- McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, McFarland HF, Paty DW, Polman CH, Reingold SC, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Sibley W, Thompson A, van den Noort S, Weinshenker BY, Wolinsky JS (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50(1):121–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rocca MA, Pagani E, Ghezzi A, Falini A, Zaffaroni M, Colombo B, Scotti G, Comi G, Filippi M (2003) Functional cortical changes in patients with multiple sclerosis and nonspecific findings on conventional magnetic resonance imaging scans of the brain. Neuroimage 19(3):826–836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Staffen W, Mair A, Zauner H, Unterrainer J, Niederhofer H, Kutzelnigg A, Ritter S, Golaszewski S, Iglseder B, Ladurner G (2002) Cognitive function and fMRI in patients with multiple sclerosis: evidence for compensatory cortical activation during an attention task. Brain 125(Pt 6):1275–1282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar