Barking up the wrong free: readiness potentials reflect processes independent of conscious will
In the early 1980s, Libet found that a readiness potential (RP) over central scalp locations begins on average several hundred milliseconds before the reported time of awareness of willing to move (W). Haggard and Eimer Exp Brain Res 126(1):128–133, (1999) later found no correlation between the timing of the RP and W, suggesting that the RP does not reflect processes causal of W. However, they did find a positive correlation between the onset of the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) and W, suggesting that the LRP might reflect processes causal of W. Here, we report a failure to replicate Haggard and Eimer’s LRP finding with a larger group of participants and several variations of their analytical method. Although we did find a between-subject correlation in just one of 12 related analyses of the LRP, we crucially found no within-subject covariation between LRP onset and W. These results suggest that the RP and LRP reflect processes independent of will and consciousness. This conclusion has significant implications for our understanding of the neural basis of motor action and potentially for arguments about free will and the causal role of consciousness.
KeywordsReadiness potential Libet Volition Consciousness Free will
We would like to thank Devin Routh for assisting with data collection. This study was supported by a grant from the Templeton Foundation as part of the Big Questions in Free Will project led by Alfred Mele (to T.W., P.T., W.S-A, and A.R.).
- Gomes G (2010) Preparing to move and deciding not to move. Conscious Cognit 19(1):457–459 Google Scholar
- Jasper HH (1958) The ten-twenty system of the international federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 10:371–375Google Scholar
- Mill JS (1843) A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. John W. Parker, Oxford University, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Schröter H, Leuthold H (2008) Effects of response sequence length on motor programming: a chronometric analysis. Acta Psychologica 128(1):186–196Google Scholar
- Sinnot-Armstrong W, Nadel L (eds) (2010) Conscious will and responsibility, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
- Sirigu A, Daprati E, Ciancia S, Giraux P, Nighoghossian N, Posada A, Haggard P (2004) Altered awareness of voluntary action after damage to the parietal cortex. Nature Neurosci 7(1):80–84Google Scholar
- van Boxtel G, Brunia C (1994) Motor and non-motor components of the contingent negative variation. Int J Psychophysiol 17(3):269–79 Google Scholar
- van Boxtel G, van den Boogaart B, Brunia C (1993) The contingent negative variation in a choice reaction time task. J Psychophysiol 7:11–23 Google Scholar
- Wegner DM (2002) The Illusion of conscious will. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Wheatley T, Looser CE (2010) Prospective codes fulfilled: a potential neural mechanism of will. In: Sinnott-Armstrong W, Nadel L (eds) Conscious will and responsibility: a tribute to benjamin libet. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar