Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 225, Issue 1, pp 75–84 | Cite as

Perceptuo-motor learning rate declines by half from 20s to 70/80s

  • Rachel O. Coats
  • Winona Snapp-Childs
  • Andrew D. Wilson
  • Geoffrey P. Bingham
Research Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

This study examined perception–action learning in younger adults in their 20s compared to older adults in their 70s and 80s. The goal was to provide, for the first time, quantitative estimates of perceptuo-motor learning rates for each age group and to reveal how these learning rates change between these age groups. We used a visual coordination task in which participants are asked to learn to produce a novel-coordinated rhythmic movement. The task has been studied extensively in young adults, and the characteristics of the task are well understood. All groups showed improvement, although learning rates for those in their 70s and 80s were half the rate for those in their 20s. We consider the potential causes of these differences in learning rates by examining performance across the different coordination patterns examined as well as recent results that reveal age-related deficits in motion perception.

Keywords

Rhythmic coordination Older adults Aging Learning Perception 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson GJ (2012) Aging and vision: changes in function and performance from optics to perception. WIREs Cogn Sci 3(3):403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball K, Sekuler R (1986) Improving visual perception in older observers. J Gerontol 41(2):176–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Betts LR, Taylor CP, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ (2005) Aging reduces center-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Neuron 45:361–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billino J, Bremmer F, Genefurtner KR (2008) Differential aging of motion processing mechanisms: evidence against general perceptual decline. Vis Res 48:1254–1261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bingham GP (2001) A perceptually driven dynamical model of rhythmic limb movement and bimanual coordination. In: 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society. LEA Publishers, Hillsdale, pp 75–79Google Scholar
  6. Bingham GP (2004a) A perceptually driven dynamical model of bimanual rhythmic movement (and phase perception). Ecol Psychol 16(1):45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bingham GP (2004b) Another timing variable composed of state variables: phase perception and phase driven oscillators. In: Hecht H, Savelsbergh G (eds) Theories of time-to-contact. MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  8. Bingham GP, Schmidt RC, Zaal F (1999) Visual perception of the relative phasing of human limb movements. Percept Psychophys 61(2):246–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckingham T, Whitaker D, Banford D (1987) Movement in decline? Oscillatory movement displacement thresholds increase with ageing. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 7:411–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donovan JJ, Radosevich DJ (1999) A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: now you see it, now you don’t. J Appl Psychol 84(5):795–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghisletta P, Kennedy KM, Rodrigue KM, Lindenberger U, Raz N (2010) Adult age differences and the role of cognitive resources in perceptual-motor skill acquisition: application of a multilevel negative exponential model. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 65B(2):163–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilmore GC, Wenk HE, Naylor LA, Stuve TA (1992) Motion perception and aging. Psychol Aging 7(4):654–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Habak C, Faubery J (2000) Larger effect of aging on the perception of higher-order stimuli. Vis Res 40:943–950PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haken H, Kelso JA, Bunz H (1985) A theoretical model of phase transition in human hand movements. Biol Cybern 51:347–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kay BA, Kelso JAS, Saltzman ES, Schoner G (1987) The space-time behavior of single and bimanual rhythmical movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:564–583Google Scholar
  17. Kelso JAS (1981) On the oscillatory basis of movement. Bull Psychon Soc 18:63Google Scholar
  18. Kelso JAS (1984) Phase-transitions and critical-behavior in human bimanual coordination. Am J Physiol 246:1000–1004Google Scholar
  19. Kleiner M, Brainard D, Pelli D (2007) What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception 36, ECVP Abstract SupplementGoogle Scholar
  20. Kovacs AJ, Buchanan JJ, Shea CH (2009a) Bimanual 1:1 with 90 degrees continuous relative phase: difficult or easy! Exp Brain Res 193(1):129–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kovacs AJ, Buchanan JJ, Shea CH (2009b) Using scanning trials to assess intrinsic coordination dynamics. Neurosci Lett 455(3):162–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leech JA, Wilson AD (submitted) Coordinated rhythmic movement is a perception-action task: the consequences of visual feedback and muscle homology on learning and performanceGoogle Scholar
  23. Liang Z, Yang Y, Li G, Zhang J, Wang Y, Zhou Y et al (2010) Aging affects the direction selectivity of MT cells in rhesus monkeys. Neurobiol Aging 31(5):863–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mechsner F, Kerzel D, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2001) Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 414:69–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nedelko V, Hassaa T, Hamzeib F et al (2010) Age-independent activation in areas of the mirror neuron system during action observation and action imagery. A fMRI study. Restor Neurol Neurosi 28:737–747Google Scholar
  26. Norman JF, Dawson TE, Butler AK (2000) The effects of age upon the perception of depth and 3-D shape from differential motion and binocular disparity. Perception 29:1335–1359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Norman JF, Ross HE, Hawkes LM, Long JR (2003) Aging and the perception of speed. Perception 32:85–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Panzer S, Gruetzmacher N, Fries U, Krueger M, Shea CH (2011) Age-related effects in interlimb practice on coding complex movement sequences. Hum Mov Sci 30(2):459–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pedhazur EJ (1982) Multiple regression in behavioral research: explanation and prediction. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Pelli DG (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychopysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10:437–442Google Scholar
  31. Pfeiffer E (1975) A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 23(10):433–441Google Scholar
  32. Schmidt RC, Carello C, Turvey MT (1990) Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16:227–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Serrien DJ, Swinnen SP, Stelmach GE (2000) Age-related deterioration of coordinated interlimb behaviour. J Gerontol 55B(5):295–303Google Scholar
  34. Snapp-Childs W, Wilson AD, Bingham GP (2011) The stability of rhythmic movement coordination depends on relative speed: the Bingham model supported. Exp Brain Res 215:89–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Snowden RJ, Kavanagh E (2006) Motion perception in the ageing visual system: minimum motion, motion coherence, and speed discrimination thresholds. Perception 35:9–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Swinnen SP, Verschueren SMP, Bogaerts H, Dounskaia N (1998) Age-related deficits in motor learning and differences in feedback processing during the production of a bimanual coordination pattern. Cogn Neuropsychol 15(5):439–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Temprado JJ, Swinnen SP, Carson RG, Tourment A, Laurent M (2003) Interaction of directional, neuromuscular and egocentric constraints on the stability of preferred bimanual coordination patterns. Hum Mov Sci 22:339–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Trick GL, Silverman SE (1991) Visual sensitivity to motion—age-related changes and deficits in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurology 41:1437–1440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Voelcker-Rehage C (2008) Motor-skill learning in older adults—a review of studies on age-related differences. Eur Rev Aging Phys Activ 5:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilson AD, Bingham GP (2008) Identifying the information for the visual perception of relative phase. Percept Psychophys 70:465–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson AD, Bingham GP, Craig JC (2003) Proprioceptive perception of phase variability. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29(6):1179–1190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilson AD, Collins DR, Bingham GP (2005a) Perceptual coupling in rhythmic movement coordination—stable perception leads to stable action. Exp Brain Res 164:517–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilson AD, Collins DR, Bingham GP (2005b) Human movement coordination implicates relative direction as the information for relative phase. Exp Brain Res 165:351–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilson AD, Snapp-Childs W, Bingham GP (2010a) Perceptual learning immediately yields new stable motor coordination. Exp Brain Res 36(6):1508–1514Google Scholar
  45. Wilson AD, Snapp-Childs W, Coats RO, Bingham GP (2010b) Learning a coordinated rhythmic movement with task-appropriate coordination feedback. Exp Brain Res 205(4):513–520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wimmers RH, Beek PJ, Wieringen PCW (1992) Phase transitions in rhythmic tracking movements: a case of unilateral coupling. Hum Mov Sci 11(1–2):217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wishart LR, Lee TD, Cunningham SJ, Murdoch JE (2002) Age-related differences and the role of augmented visual feedback in learning a bimanual coordination pattern. Acta Psychol 110:247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yamanishi J, Kawato M, Suzuki R (1980) Two coupled oscillators as a model for the coordinated finger tapping by both hands. Biol Cybern 37:219–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zaal F, Bingham GP, Schmidt RC (2000) Visual perception of relative phase and phase variability. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26(3):1209–1220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zanone PG, Kelso JAS (1992) Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: nonequilibrium phase transitions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18(2):403–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel O. Coats
    • 1
    • 3
  • Winona Snapp-Childs
    • 1
  • Andrew D. Wilson
    • 2
  • Geoffrey P. Bingham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, School of Social, Psychological and Communication SciencesLeeds Metropolitan UniversityLeedsUK
  3. 3.Centre for Sport and Exercise SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations