Discrimination is not impaired when more cortical space between two electro-tactile markers increases perceived duration
- 178 Downloads
The purpose of the present study was to examine how duration processing is affected by space between two electro-tactile stimuli marking inter-stimulus time intervals. The results of two experiments, where the method of constant stimuli was used, indicated that discrimination remained at the same level when delivering two markers to different fingers (of the same hand) resulted in longer perceived duration than delivering them to the same finger. Indeed, in Experiment 1, intervals were overestimated while discrimination remained at the same level when the leading and tailing markers were delivered to the index and ring fingers, respectively, compared with when both markers were delivered to the index finger. In Experiment 2, while there were individual differences in spatial effect on perceived duration when the leading and tailing markers were delivered to the middle and little fingers, respectively, discrimination remained at the same level even with participants overestimating intervals. This indicates that variability in duration processing is constant within the same cortical hemisphere when more space between two stimuli marking time results in longer perceived duration.
KeywordsEmpty time interval Electro-tactile stimuli Time–space interaction Finger Somatosensory area Discrimination
This research was made possible by a research grant awarded to SG by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada. We would like to extend special thanks to Elsa Massicotte, Félix Désautels, Katherine Labonté, Larissa Roy, Noémie de la Sablonnière, and Vincent Laflamme for their help in data collection, and to Åke Hellström and two anonymous reviewers for valuable suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript.
- Abe S (1935) Experimental study on the co-relation between time and space. Tohoku Psychol Folia 3:53–68Google Scholar
- Baumgartner C, Doppelbauer A, Sutherling WW, Zeitlhofer J, Lindinger G, Lind C, Deecke L (1991) Human somatosensory cortical finger representation as studied by combined neuromagnetic and neuroelectric measurements. Neurosci Lett 134:103–108. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90518-X PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eisler H, Eisler AD, Hellström Å (2008) Psychophysical issues in the study of time perception. In: Grondin S (ed) Psychology of time. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, pp 75–109Google Scholar
- Gescheider GA (1997) Psychophysics: the fundamentals. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
- Grondin S (2008) Methods for studying psychological time. In: Grondin S (ed) Psychology of time. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, pp 51–74Google Scholar
- ten Hoopen G, Miyauchi R, Nakajima Y (2008) Time-based illusions in the auditory mode. In: Grondin S (ed) Psychology of time. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, pp 139–188Google Scholar