Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 224, Issue 2, pp 211–220 | Cite as

The role of the basal ganglia in action imitation: neuropsychological evidence from Parkinson’s disease patients

  • Carolina Bonivento
  • Raffaella I. Rumiati
  • Emanuele Biasutti
  • Glyn W. Humphreys
Research Article

Abstract

Though previous studies have suggested that the basal ganglia are necessarily involved in action imitation, their precise role is unclear. An important source of evidence concerns patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who suffer basal ganglia impairments. Some studies report poor execution of observed meaningful (MF) transitive (tool-related) actions but normal performance with intransitive (non-tool-related) MF and meaningless (ML) actions (Leiguarda et al. in Brain 120:75–90, 1997; Leiguarda 2001 in Neuroimage 14:137–141). In other cases, though, patients with lesions involving the basal ganglia appear impaired in imitating ML as compared to meaningful MF transitive pantomimes. Here, we tested a group of PD patients in a full 2 × 2 design with MF transitive and intransitive pantomimes and matched ML movements. PD patients generated higher scores when imitating MF transitive actions than ML-matched actions. On the other hand, ML than MF intransitive actions did not differ significantly. The performance of the patients on imitating ML transitive actions also correlated with their performance on the Corsi block test of visuospatial memory and their scores at the test of verbal fluency for phonemic categories (FAS) while MF intransitive actions correlated with FAS and the neurological evaluation (UPDRS) The results are discussed in terms of the factors that load on visual memory for action reproduction, as well as the possible role of the basal ganglia in communicative actions (for MF intransitive actions).

Keywords

Parkinson’s disease Basal ganglia Imitation Ideomotor apraxia Transitive actions Intransitive actions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out in partial fulfillment of a PhD at the University of Birmingham by the first author. Thanks to Dr. Gioia Negri, Dr. Anna Sverzut and Dr. Federica Mondolo for helping in the neuropsychological assessment of the patients, and to Dr. Antonietta Zadini and Dr. Gilberto Pizzolato for their help in recruiting the patients and for providing their neurological assessment.

References

  1. Carmo JC, Rumiati RI (2009) Imitation of transitive and intransitive actions in healthy individuals. Brain Cogn 69:460–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Costa A, Peppe A, Dell’Agnello G, Carlesimo GA, Murri L, Bonuccelli U, Caltagirone C (2003) Dopaminergic modulation of visual-spatial working memory in Parkinson’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 15:55–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Giovagnoli AR, Del Pesce M, Mascheroni S, Simonceli M, Laiacona M, Captitani E (1996) Trail making test: normative values from 287 normal adult controls. Ital J Neurol Sci 17:305–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kareken DA, Unverzagt F, Caldemeyer K, Farlow MR, Hutchins GD (1998) Functional brain imaging in apraxia. Arch Neurol 55:107–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lange KW, Robbins TW, Marsden CD, James M, Owen AM, Paul GM (1992) L-Dopa withdrawal in Parkinson’s disease selectively impairs cognitive performance in tests sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction. Psychopharmacology 107:394–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Leiguarda R (2001) Limb apraxia: cortical or subcortical. Neuroimage 14:137–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leiguarda R, Pramstaller P, Marello M, Starkstein S, Lees AJ, Marsden CD (1997) Apraxia in Parkinson’s disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, multiple system atrophy and neuroleptic-induced parkinsonism. Brain 120:75–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Luzzati C, Willmes K, De Bleser R, Bianchi A, Chiesa G, De Tanti A, Gonnella ML, Lorenzi L, Bozzoli C (1994) Nuovi dati normative per la versione italiana dell’ Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr 55:1086–1131Google Scholar
  9. Magni E, Binetti G, Bianchetti A, Rozzini R, Trabucchi M (1996) Mini-Mental State Examination: a normative study in an Italian elderly population. Eur J Neurol 3:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McNamara P, Durso R (2003) Pragmatic communication skills in patients with Parkinson’ s disease. Brain Lang 84:414–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Orsini A, Laicardi C (1997) W.A.I.S.-R: contributo alla taratura italiana. Organizzazioni speciali, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
  12. Owen AM, Iddon JL, Hodges JR, Summers BA, Robbins TW (1997) Spatial and non-spatial working memory at different stages of Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 35(4):519–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Peigneux P, Salmon E, Garraux G, Laureys S, Willems S, Dujardin K, Degueldre C, Lemaire C, Luxen A, Moonen G, Franck G, Destee A, Van der Linden M (2001) Neural and cognitive bases of upper limb apraxia in corticobasal degeneration. Neurology 57:1259–1268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peigneux P, Van der Linden M, Garraux G, Laureys S, Delgueldre C, Aerts J, Del Fiore G, Moonen G, Luxen A, Salmon E (2004) Imaging a cognitive model of apraxia: the neural substrate of action-specific cognitive processes. Hum Brain Mapp 21:119–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pramstaller PP, Marsden CD (1996) The basal ganglia and apraxia [review]. Brain 119:319–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rothi LJG, Heliman KM (1997) Apraxia. The neuropsychology of action. Psychology Press, East Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Rothi LJG, Ochipa C, Heilman KM (1991) A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cogn Neuropsychol 8:443–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roy AE (2000) Apraxia in diseases of the basal ganglia. Mov Disord 15(4):598–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rumiati RI, Tessari A (2002) Imitation of novel and well-known actions: the role of short-term memory. Exp Brain Res 142:425–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rumiati RI, Weiss PH, Tessari A, Assmus A, Zilles K, Herzog H, Fink GR (2005) Common and differential neural mechanisms supporting imitation of meaningful and meaningless actions. J Cogn Neurosci 17:1420–1431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rumiati RI, Carmo JC, Corradi-Dell’Acqua C (2009) Neuropsychological perspectives on the mechanisms of imitation. Philos T R Soc Lon B 364:2337–2347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Spinler H, Tognoni G (1987) Standardizzazione e taratura italiana di test neuropsicologici. Ital J Neurol Sci 6(8):12–120Google Scholar
  23. Tessari A, Rumiati RI (2004) The strategic control of multiple routes in imitation of actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:1107–1116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tessari A, Canessa N, Ukmar M, Rumiati RI (2007) Neuropsychological evidence for a strategic control of multiple routes in imitation. Brain 130:1111–1126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tessari A, Lunardelli A, Zadini A, Rumiati RI (in press) Prova standardizzata per la diagnosi del disturbo aprassico ideomotorio selettivo per tipo di gesto e tipo di effettore. Ricerche di PsicologiaGoogle Scholar
  26. Warrington EK, James M (1991) VOSP: the visual object and space perception battery. Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St Edmunds, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolina Bonivento
    • 1
    • 2
  • Raffaella I. Rumiati
    • 4
  • Emanuele Biasutti
    • 5
  • Glyn W. Humphreys
    • 3
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of BirminghamEdgbaston, BirminghamUK
  2. 2.IRCCS “E. Medea”, Clinica PsichiatricaAzienda Ospedaliera UniversitariaUdineItaly
  3. 3.Department of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  4. 4.Settore di Neuroscienze CognitiveScuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi AvanzatiTriesteItaly
  5. 5.Istituto di Medicina Fisica e Riabilitazione “Gervasutta”UdineItaly

Personalised recommendations