Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 223, Issue 4, pp 469–478 | Cite as

Investigating a two causes theory of inhibition of return

Research Article

Abstract

It has recently been demonstrated that there are independent sensory and motor mechanisms underlying inhibition of return (IOR) when measured with oculomotor responses (Wang et al. in Exp Brain Res 218:441–453, 2012). However, these results are seemingly in conflict with previous empirical results which led to the proposal that there are two mutually exclusive flavors of IOR (Taylor and Klein in J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:1639–1656, 2000). The observed differences in empirical results across these studies and the theoretical frameworks that were proposed based on the results are likely due to differences in the experimental designs. The current experiments establish that the existence of additive sensory and motor contributions to IOR do not depend on target type, repeated spatiotopic stimulation, attentional control settings, or a temporal gap between fixation offset and cue onset, when measured with saccadic responses. Furthermore, our experiments show that the motor mechanism proposed by Wang et al. in Exp Brain Res 218:441–453, (2012) is likely restricted to the oculomotor system, since the additivity effect does not carry over into the manual response modality.

Keywords

Inhibition of return Attention Orienting Eye movements Superior colliculus 

References

  1. Abrams RA, Dobkin RS (1994) The gap effect and inhibition return: interactive effects on eye movement latencies. Exp Brain Res 98:483–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson EJ, Rees G (2011) Neural correlates of spatial orienting in the human superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 106:2273–2284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dorris MC, Klein RM, Everling S, Munoz DP (2002) Contribution of the primate superior colliculus to inhibition of return. J Cogn Neurosci 14:1256–1263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dukewich KR (2009) Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response. Psychon Bull Rev 16:238–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dukewich KR, Boehnke S (2008) Cue repetition increases inhibition of return. Neurosci Lett 448:231–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fecteau JH, Munoz DP (2005) Correlates of capture of attention and inhibition of return across stages of visual processing. J Cogn Neurosci 17:1714–1727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hilchey MD, Ivanoff J, Taylor TL, Klein RM (2011) The effect of inhibition of return on the temporal dynamics of spatial information processing. Acta Psychologica 136:235–244Google Scholar
  8. Hilchey M, Klein RM, Satel J, Wang Z (2012) Oculomotor inhibition of return: how soon is it “recoded” into spatiotopic coordinates? Atten Percept Psychophys 74:1145–1153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hooge IT, Frens MA (2000) Inhibition of saccade return (ISR): spatio-temporal properties of saccade programming. Vis Res 40:3415–3426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hunt AR, Kingstone A (2003) Inhibition of return: dissociating attentional and oculomotor components. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29:1068–1074PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klein RM, Macinnes JW (1999) Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychol Sci 10:346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klein RM (2000) Inhibition of return. Trends Cogn Sci 4:138–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Masson M, Loftus G (2003) Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Can J Exp Psychol 57:203–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mathôt S, Theeuwes J (2011) Gradual remapping results in early retinotopic and late spatiotopic inhibition of return. Psychol Sci 21:1793–1798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maylor EA, Hockey R (1985) Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:777–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nagy A, Kruse W, Rottmann S, Dannenberg S, Hoffman K (2006) Somatosensory-motor neuronal activity in the superior colliculus of the primate. Neuron 52:525–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Olejnik S, Algina J (2003) Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychol Methods 8:434–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pertzov Y, Zohary E, Avidan G (2011) Rapid formation of spatiotopic representations as revealed by inhibition of return. J Neurosci 30:8882–8887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Posner MI (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32:3–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Posner MI, Cohen Y (1984) Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma H, Bouwhuis DG (eds) Attention and performance. Hillsdale, NJ, London, pp 531–556Google Scholar
  21. Posner MI, Rafal RD, Choate LS, Vaughan J (1985) Inhibition of return: neural basis and function. Cogn Neuropsychol 2:211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prime DJ, Ward LM (2006) Cortical expressions of inhibition of return. Brain Res 1072:161–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saslow MG (1967) Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency of saccadic eye movements. J Opt Soc Am 57:1024–1029PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Satel J, Wang Z, Trappenberg TP, Klein RM (2011) Modeling inhibition of return as short-term depression of early sensory input to the superior colliculus. Vis Res 51:987–996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Satel J, Wang Z, Hilchey MD, Klein RM (2012) Examining the dissociation of retinotopic and spatiotopic inhibition of return with event-related potentials. Neurosci LettGoogle Scholar
  26. Taylor TL, Klein RM (1998) On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychon Bull Rev 5:625–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor TL, Klein RM (2000) Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:1639–1656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang Z, Klein RM (2012) Focal spatial attention can eliminate inhibition of return. Psychon Bull Rev 19:462–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang Z, Satel J, Trappenberg TP, Klein RM (2011) Aftereffects of saccades explored in a dynamic neural field model of the superior colliculus. J Eye Mov Res 4:1–16Google Scholar
  30. Wang Z, Satel J, Klein RM (2012) Sensory and motor mechanisms of oculomotor inhibition of return. Exp Brain Res 218:441–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Werner W, Dannenberg S, Hoffman K (1997) Arm-movement-related neurons in the primate superior colliculus and underlying reticular formation: comparison of neuronal activity with EMGs of muscles of the shoulder, arm and trunk during reaching. Exp Brain Res 115:191–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Computer ScienceDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Department of Cognitive PsychologyVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations